Mark Andrews vs Austin Hooper

[problemsolver]

Would you rather roster Mark Andrews or Austin Hooper going forward?

How far apart do you see them?

[Hambone]

A lot of this depends on where Hooper ends up...

[jwb32]

I prefer Andrews. Hooper was in the ideal situation in Atlanta. No TE competition, played with a better (throwing) QB, and had Julio and Ridley pulling all the attention. His situation can only get worse if he moves on. Andrews was basically the primary WR for the Ravens and defenses still couldn’t shut him down. And he’s 2 years younger.

[OhSnapItsAnt]

I prefer Andrews. Hooper was in the ideal situation in Atlanta. No TE competition, played with a better (throwing) QB, and had Julio and Ridley pulling all the attention. His situation can only get worse if he moves on. Andrews was basically the primary WR for the Ravens and defenses still couldn’t shut him down. And he’s 2 years younger.

X2

[Gator Sens]

I would take Andrews based on the system he is in and the opportunity. Hooper is great, but who knows where he ends up and if it will be a TE friendly system.

[WhatWouldDitkaDo]

Andrews, but I wouldn't add more than a late 2nd to Hooper to get him. I value them very equally. The main reasons Andrews gets an edge is due to age and unknown landing spot for Hooper, but that's not a huge concern, as I'd imagine whatever team paying up for Hooper would be making him a big part of the offense.

[RB6]

I'll give the edge to Andrews.