Gallup, Kirk, Tannehill Deals (SF, completed)

[tommymct]

Just a price check for you guys on a couple dudes- completed a couple deals in SF. I am on the side selling the players for picks. I think all of these are pretty "market'.

Tannehill for 1.9
Christian Kirk for 2.3 and 2021 1st (mid-late)
Gallup for Mecole, 1.12, 2.6

[WhatWouldDitkaDo]

I like all three trades for you. Well done.

[FantasyFoosball]

In a SF, I'd want two mid firsts for Tannehill, or at least one mid and one late first. I think you sold low on him.

I'd prefer Kirk as well. Not awful value by any means, but I'd rather a 2020 mid first, instead of a pick that's a year out and could end up being a late first. In a non SF I'd want an early first, but even in a SF I'd want at least a mid first. Too much of an unknown with a 2021 first.

I'd prefer Gallup as well. Again, not terrible value, but I'd want an earlier first for him. The 1.12 is too late, and Hardman and a mid second don't do a whole lot for me.

So I think you definitely sold low on Tannehill, and I think you sold a little low on Kirk and Gallup, but hopefully it works out for you. Good luck.

[jwb32]

I like all three trades for you. Well done.

X2

[tommymct]

In a SF, I'd want two mid firsts for Tannehill, or at least one mid and one late first. I think you sold low on him.

I'd prefer Kirk as well. Not awful value by any means, but I'd rather a 2020 mid first, instead of a pick that's a year out and could end up being a late first. In a non SF I'd want an early first, but even in a SF I'd want at least a mid first. Too much of an unknown with a 2021 first.

I'd prefer Gallup as well. Again, not terrible value, but I'd want an earlier first for him. The 1.12 is too late, and Hardman and a mid second don't do a whole lot for me.

So I think you definitely sold low on Tannehill, and I think you sold a little low on Kirk and Gallup, but hopefully it works out for you. Good luck.

Thanks - good perspective. I don't think I could've gotten anything more for Tanny, was sold to the best acquirer. Probably could've squeezed more for Gallup and Kirk. I'm really high on the late first / early second in SuperFlex drafts this year so was focused on acquiring as much capital as I could there. Also still expect draft pick value to rise between now and June and may end up flipping around for vets as a pretty competitive team.

[WhatWouldDitkaDo]

In a SF, I'd want two mid firsts for Tannehill, or at least one mid and one late first. I think you sold low on him.

I haven't seen any trades with that kind of valuation on Tannehill, even in superflex. Best case scenario, I think you could get one mid 1st for him. I think the 1.09 is very good value given the current market.

[FantasyFoosball]

In a SF, I'd want two mid firsts for Tannehill, or at least one mid and one late first. I think you sold low on him.

I'd prefer Kirk as well. Not awful value by any means, but I'd rather a 2020 mid first, instead of a pick that's a year out and could end up being a late first. In a non SF I'd want an early first, but even in a SF I'd want at least a mid first. Too much of an unknown with a 2021 first.

I'd prefer Gallup as well. Again, not terrible value, but I'd want an earlier first for him. The 1.12 is too late, and Hardman and a mid second don't do a whole lot for me.

So I think you definitely sold low on Tannehill, and I think you sold a little low on Kirk and Gallup, but hopefully it works out for you. Good luck.

Thanks - good perspective. I don't think I could've gotten anything more for Tanny, was sold to the best acquirer. Probably could've squeezed more for Gallup and Kirk. I'm really high on the late first / early second in SuperFlex drafts this year so was focused on acquiring as much capital as I could there. Also still expect draft pick value to rise between now and June and may end up flipping around for vets as a pretty competitive team.

If you can use those picks to go out and get an elite stud that helps put your team over the top, then yes, I think that ends up being a great move.

[Gator Sens]

Nice deals all around in my opinion, nice work.

[Goddard]

I'd do all 3.

[makemeasandwich]

Thumbs up on the first two. I'm a really big fan of Gallup and probably would have held him for that.

[BigBawseRoss]

like em all. gallup deal only one that maybe feels light but im on board with your line of thinking that the picks will be huge for you

[tommymct]

Thumbs up on the first two. I'm a really big fan of Gallup and probably would have held him for that.

I really like Mecole so probably skews my value. Projecting him to be almost every down 2nd wideout next year with Watkins likely cut and Demarcus Robinson a free agent. Has been electric thus far when he touches the ball.

[kmbryant09]

I think you sold a little low on Tannehill, but if you were intent on selling and that was your best offer, than so be it.

I feel like the Kirk deal is either going to look really good, or really bad a month into the 2020 season. If Kirk breaks out, you definitely sold low. But if he / that passing offense continues to struggle and someone else takes over the #1 role there, you did well.

I know some people really like Gallup, but that last trade is a steal. I think Gallup = Hardman straight up, so to get picks 12 & 18 in a strong class on top of that is impressive.

[Fins1354]

Good job on all 3. I really don't see people giving 2 mid 1sts for Tannehill, or even a 1st & 2nd. So I think you got good value for him in SF.

[FantasyFoosball]

Lol. The hate for Tannehill is palpable here....

Depending on league settings, Tannehill was easily a top five QB, maybe even top 3, from when he started playing in week 7 to the end of the year. Then he led the Titans to the conference championship in the playoffs....

So the notion that he's worth a late first in a SF league.... no. That's crazy talk to me.