Gurley for Diggs

[chronicdakpain]

Hello everyone,

I need some advice. I'm pretty Rams-heavy with my dynasty team and wanted to diversify. Currently Gurley for Diggs (and maybe a late pick) are up for discussion and the current owner seems quite interested. How do you see this trade? Fair? My two concerns with this trade are that it might bite me later as I don't have another solid RB behind CMC and Henry without Gurley, and that Diggs also has some lows that come with the lack of passes in the Vikings offense... What are your guys takes on this?

[Gator Sens]

I would rather have Diggs and a pick long term then Gurley at this point. I also would not hesitate to flip Diggs to a believer if that is an option and the price is right. Diggs is a solid asset but wildly inconsistent. Not sure anyone ever feels comfortable starting him week to week. Gurley is a pretty big question mark and I would rather get out too early then too late.

[FantasyFoosball]

The more information, the better advice we can give. What are the league settings, roster sizes, number of teams, format, what is your roster, draft picks, etc?

[chronicdakpain]

Sorry, just updated my signature. I play in a 12 team 0,75 ppr, 1QB, 2RB, 3WR, 1TE, 2 FLEX, 1D, 1K league. We can keep 13 players this season plus 2 taxi players

I'm trying to diversify my team as this has already come to haunt me once in the playoffs

[FantasyFoosball]

I'd move Gurley only if you can get the first added to Diggs. Gurley and Diggs are fairly even, although I have Gurley slightly ahead of Diggs. I don't really like either one of them though, and are lower on both than most.

The late first would probably be my favorite piece in this deal. Leaves you thin at RB, so you would need to address that.

[Goddard]

I think I'd rather have Diggs at this point.

[WhatWouldDitkaDo]

Don't love either Gurley or Diggs long-term. I'd take whoever you think you can sell for a better 1st round rookie pick.

[chronicdakpain]

Another offer that is on the table is Lockett + Tevin Coleman for Gurley + 5.01

[FantasyFoosball]

I'd rather have Diggs and a late 1st than Lockett and Coleman.

[chronicdakpain]

To clarify the late pick wasn't a late 1st but rather a 4th or 5th...

[Goddard]

Another offer that is on the table is Lockett + Tevin Coleman for Gurley + 5.01

I'd move Gurley for that.

[WhatWouldDitkaDo]

Another offer that is on the table is Lockett + Tevin Coleman for Gurley + 5.01

I'd probably do that.

[metalmat]

Another offer that is on the table is Lockett + Tevin Coleman for Gurley + 5.01

I would rather have Gurley and the pick. Coleman's value is dust and I'm just not that big a fan of Lockett.

[trvrpryc]

Diggs and a pick for me.

[Pats/VikesFan]

I would hold Gurley, due to the inconsistency of the other options.