Who would you rather own PPR

[Matt1975]

Stefon Diggs, Adam Thielen, Tyler Lockett or Calvin Ridley for the remainder of this year?

So, Lockett seems like the answer for 1 year. How much does this change if it were for the next 3 years?

[Gator Sens]

This year, Lockett.

[Goddard]

Lockett pretty easily if it's just for this year.

[Mike from Canada]

Lockett
Ridley

Thielen

Diggs

[RB6]

Lockett pretty easily.

[BigBawseRoss]

im prob most into diggs from that group based on age and thinking theres no way in hell the vikings offense stays the course.

lockett easily?? in 2018 lockett saw 0 games over 5 catches, he is not a strong ppr option despite the random target booms in weeks 2 and 3. in weeks 1 and 4 he had a total of 6 targets. hes incredibly TD dependent. DK will become more and more of a threat to his production as the season grows imo.

[Slackalacker]

Lockett
Ridley

Thielen

Diggs

Same for me

[Goddard]

Someone clearly didn't read the question. Stating all of Lockett's flaws and leaving out the many flaws all the remainder of the WRs have.

PPR points for the first quarter of the season:

Lockett - 70 points (32 targets)
Thielen - 49 points (22 targets)
Ridley - 48.7 points (23 targets)
Diggs - 37.9 points (19 targets)

Yeah, this isn't easily Lockett? Pointing out stats from 2018? What are we even talking about. You point out targets and yards and yet your pick (Diggs) has the least amount of targets and yards out of everyone on the list. C'mon man, be better than that if you're going to rant.

[badbuddah]

Lockett and not particularly close. Thielen could surge if he starts getting TDs but Vikings are a bit of a mess.

[BigBawseRoss]

Someone clearly didn't read the question. Stating all of Lockett's flaws and leaving out the many flaws all the remainder of the WRs have.

PPR points for the first quarter of the season:

Lockett - 70 points (32 targets)
Thielen - 49 points (22 targets)
Ridley - 48.7 points (23 targets)
Diggs - 37.9 points (19 targets)

Yeah, this isn't easily Lockett? Pointing out stats from 2018? What are we even talking about. You point out targets and yards and yet your pick (Diggs) has the least amount of targets and yards out of everyone on the list. C'mon man, be better than that if you're going to rant.

didnt rant. but you are correct i didnt get into each of the deficiencies of each player listed. the 5 responses that made it seem like a silly question that the answer was obviously lockett made me highlight that in my response. its silly to say diggs has the lowest targets so hes the worst lol. i look at 2018 because that is the most recent sample of work prior to the 4 weeks of this season. its called seeing the big picture and looking at all available data. the data tells me that locket had 2 weeks that appeal to someone playing in ppr and 2 that would not. my points remain valid. if you have points to add to the topic i would love to hear them. otherwise let me say what i wanna say and YOU be better. "Lockett pretty easily if it's just for this year." - so insightful

[Goddard]

Someone clearly didn't read the question. Stating all of Lockett's flaws and leaving out the many flaws all the remainder of the WRs have.

PPR points for the first quarter of the season:

Lockett - 70 points (32 targets)
Thielen - 49 points (22 targets)
Ridley - 48.7 points (23 targets)
Diggs - 37.9 points (19 targets)

Yeah, this isn't easily Lockett? Pointing out stats from 2018? What are we even talking about. You point out targets and yards and yet your pick (Diggs) has the least amount of targets and yards out of everyone on the list. C'mon man, be better than that if you're going to rant.

didnt rant. but you are correct i didnt get into each of the deficiencies of each player listed. the 5 responses that made it seem like a silly question that the answer was obviously lockett made me highlight that in my response. its silly to say diggs has the lowest targets so hes the worst lol. i look at 2018 because that is the most recent sample of work prior to the 4 weeks of this season. its called seeing the big picture and looking at all available data. the data tells me that locket had 2 weeks that appeal to someone playing in ppr and 2 that would not. my points remain valid. if you have points to add to the topic i would love to hear them. otherwise let me say what i wanna say and YOU be better. "Lockett pretty easily if it's just for this year." - so insightful

So you're down on Lockett because he's only had 2 weeks that appeal to you, but Diggs only have 1 good week is more appealing? Gotcha.

And dude, have you read some of your responses on here where you don't even answer the question lol. Don't talk to me about insightful.

[BigBawseRoss]

Someone clearly didn't read the question. Stating all of Lockett's flaws and leaving out the many flaws all the remainder of the WRs have.

PPR points for the first quarter of the season:

Lockett - 70 points (32 targets)
Thielen - 49 points (22 targets)
Ridley - 48.7 points (23 targets)
Diggs - 37.9 points (19 targets)

Yeah, this isn't easily Lockett? Pointing out stats from 2018? What are we even talking about. You point out targets and yards and yet your pick (Diggs) has the least amount of targets and yards out of everyone on the list. C'mon man, be better than that if you're going to rant.

didnt rant. but you are correct i didnt get into each of the deficiencies of each player listed. the 5 responses that made it seem like a silly question that the answer was obviously lockett made me highlight that in my response. its silly to say diggs has the lowest targets so hes the worst lol. i look at 2018 because that is the most recent sample of work prior to the 4 weeks of this season. its called seeing the big picture and looking at all available data. the data tells me that locket had 2 weeks that appeal to someone playing in ppr and 2 that would not. my points remain valid. if you have points to add to the topic i would love to hear them. otherwise let me say what i wanna say and YOU be better. "Lockett pretty easily if it's just for this year." - so insightful

So you're down on Lockett because he's only had 2 weeks that appeal to you, but Diggs only have 1 good week is more appealing? Gotcha.

And dude, have you read some of your responses on here where you don't even answer the question lol. Don't talk to me about insightful.

i dont remember callin you out on the thread. waiting to hear anything relevant to the thread and any insightful advice. i think i give a ton more or that than you do and you use blanket statements, a lion picture, and a high comment count to get people to support your opinions. you dont often go to bat for what you believe and almost never provide statistics or data. if you wanna get into my posts and their insightful nature lets do it. how are your teams doing? who is on them? do you have any success at dynasty fantasy football to speak from?

[Goddard]

didnt rant. but you are correct i didnt get into each of the deficiencies of each player listed. the 5 responses that made it seem like a silly question that the answer was obviously lockett made me highlight that in my response. its silly to say diggs has the lowest targets so hes the worst lol. i look at 2018 because that is the most recent sample of work prior to the 4 weeks of this season. its called seeing the big picture and looking at all available data. the data tells me that locket had 2 weeks that appeal to someone playing in ppr and 2 that would not. my points remain valid. if you have points to add to the topic i would love to hear them. otherwise let me say what i wanna say and YOU be better. "Lockett pretty easily if it's just for this year." - so insightful

So you're down on Lockett because he's only had 2 weeks that appeal to you, but Diggs only have 1 good week is more appealing? Gotcha.

And dude, have you read some of your responses on here where you don't even answer the question lol. Don't talk to me about insightful.

i dont remember callin you out on the thread. waiting to hear anything relevant to the thread and any insightful advice. i think i give a ton more or that than you do and you use blanket statements, a lion picture, and a high comment count to get people to support your opinions. you dont often go to bat for what you believe and almost never provide statistics or data. if you wanna get into my posts and their insightful nature lets do it. how are your teams doing? who is on them? do you have any success at dynasty fantasy football to speak from?

My teams are doing great, thanks for asking. How are your teams?

As for my lion picture and high comment count...don't even know how to respond to that. Sounds like you're getting kinda upset and don't know how to respond...and yeah, you basically called me out because your whole statement was in response to my comment and others who said the same thing. All you had to do was give your opinion and move on...rather than mockingly write a whole paragraph about how it's not easily Lockett. And then get upset when I used relevant stats explaining how it should easily be Lockett for this year.

And yes, most of my responses are pretty blanket statements because most questions are simple blanket questions. Should I move x player for y player and so on. There are plenty of threads where I give more than a yes or no answer and include stats when necessary. And I try to use them in a relevant manner than just throwing out numbers that fit my narrative.

And when do I not "go to bat for what I believe in"? Now you're just making stuff up about me. Anytime someone disagrees or calls me out (like you), I definitely try to back up my opinion. I've been in plenty of debates or disagreements on these forums on numerous topics.

[Goddard]

Oh and you're lucky I like Biggie and can't talk sh!t about your avatar.