Page 1 of 1

MT for Deebo, Kirk, 2020 1st, 2020 2nd, and 2020 3rd

Posted: Sat Sep 28, 2019 7:53 pm
by UsualSuspects
Team in sig.
Offer has been made by me.
Too little in return for MT?
Too much in return for MT?
1st round pick estimated 3-8

Re: MT for Deebo, Kirk, 2020 1st, 2020 2nd, and 2020 3rd

Posted: Sat Sep 28, 2019 7:57 pm
by RB6
Not enough.

Re: MT for Deebo, Kirk, 2020 1st, 2020 2nd, and 2020 3rd

Posted: Sat Sep 28, 2019 8:50 pm
by M-Dub
I think it’s a fair return for Thomas, especially if the pick is closer to 1.03 than 1.08. I think it gives you better depth but makes your starting lineup worse. Godwin is pretty much a plug & play at this point, but good luck deciding which two to start out of Kirk, MVS, Samuel and Samuel. Seems like it could just lead to frustration. If I were you I’d be looking to move Ertz for an upgrade at RB.

Re: MT for Deebo, Kirk, 2020 1st, 2020 2nd, and 2020 3rd

Posted: Sun Sep 29, 2019 1:15 am
by Samhain34
You need a running back; I'd be looking to dump draft picks/Brady/Ertz for a true RB1. The haul isn't bad, but you're already deep enough, which makes that first pick do or die.

Re: MT for Deebo, Kirk, 2020 1st, 2020 2nd, and 2020 3rd

Posted: Sun Sep 29, 2019 5:12 am
by Gator Sens
Solid return but I don't think this makes your team better or helps you overall. I would hold Thomas here unless you get more coming back.

Re: MT for Deebo, Kirk, 2020 1st, 2020 2nd, and 2020 3rd

Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2019 8:32 am
by Goddard
Not close for MT.

Re: MT for Deebo, Kirk, 2020 1st, 2020 2nd, and 2020 3rd

Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2019 8:36 am
by Slackalacker
That wouldn’t be enough for me to get MT

Re: MT for Deebo, Kirk, 2020 1st, 2020 2nd, and 2020 3rd

Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2019 8:59 am
by hoos89
Not enough. I'd want more confidence that the 2020 1st is closer to 3 than 8 and/or the 2020 2nd to be a 2020 1st before I considered.

Re: MT for Deebo, Kirk, 2020 1st, 2020 2nd, and 2020 3rd

Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2019 9:05 am
by FantasyFoosball
I wouldn't move MT for that.

Re: MT for Deebo, Kirk, 2020 1st, 2020 2nd, and 2020 3rd

Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2019 10:28 am
by UsualSuspects
Was declined with no counter.
Pretty sure the other owner thought it was an insulting offer.
Tried to see if he was previously interested in Ertz for Kirk and a second and he said that Kirk was worth more than Ertz straight up.

Re: MT for Deebo, Kirk, 2020 1st, 2020 2nd, and 2020 3rd

Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2019 11:39 am
by hoos89
UsualSuspects wrote: Mon Sep 30, 2019 10:28 am Was declined with no counter.
Pretty sure the other owner thought it was an insulting offer.
Tried to see if he was previously interested in Ertz for Kirk and a second and he said that Kirk was worth more than Ertz straight up.
Thought it was insulting you asked that much for MT? Weird...I wouldn't call it an auto accept, but as someone who has MT in one league and all of the pieces in the package you asked for in another league, I would easily prefer MT.

Re: MT for Deebo, Kirk, 2020 1st, 2020 2nd, and 2020 3rd

Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2019 12:49 pm
by badbuddah
Goddard wrote: Mon Sep 30, 2019 8:32 am Not close for MT.
I know MT is a stud, but that is a lot of promising talent and draft capital. Not sure I'd say not close. I'd think long and hard about it depending on my personal situation. Like everyone has said, he does need a RB, however.

Re: MT for Deebo, Kirk, 2020 1st, 2020 2nd, and 2020 3rd

Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2019 12:50 pm
by badbuddah
UsualSuspects wrote: Mon Sep 30, 2019 10:28 am Was declined with no counter.
Pretty sure the other owner thought it was an insulting offer.
Tried to see if he was previously interested in Ertz for Kirk and a second and he said that Kirk was worth more than Ertz straight up.
Sounds like he is a bleep moron. Par for the course in fantasy in my experiences. All the advice and research I do and yet I find it doesn't matter when 90% of people are idiotic.

Re: MT for Deebo, Kirk, 2020 1st, 2020 2nd, and 2020 3rd

Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2019 12:55 pm
by UsualSuspects
hoos89 wrote: Mon Sep 30, 2019 11:39 am
UsualSuspects wrote: Mon Sep 30, 2019 10:28 am Was declined with no counter.
Pretty sure the other owner thought it was an insulting offer.
Tried to see if he was previously interested in Ertz for Kirk and a second and he said that Kirk was worth more than Ertz straight up.
Thought it was insulting you asked that much for MT? Weird...I wouldn't call it an auto accept, but as someone who has MT in one league and all of the pieces in the package you asked for in another league, I would easily prefer MT.
Yeah, he is crazy rookie oriented but I thought that MT would be too much for him to pass up on.
I was wrong 🙂
After his no counter decline I wanted to make sure my valuations weren't way off.

Re: MT for Deebo, Kirk, 2020 1st, 2020 2nd, and 2020 3rd

Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2019 1:15 pm
by Goddard
badbuddah wrote: Mon Sep 30, 2019 12:49 pm
Goddard wrote: Mon Sep 30, 2019 8:32 am Not close for MT.
I know MT is a stud, but that is a lot of promising talent and draft capital. Not sure I'd say not close. I'd think long and hard about it depending on my personal situation. Like everyone has said, he does need a RB, however.
I don't know...Deebo and Kirk are nice, but nothing special nor anywhere near MT's value. Adding a mid-ish 1st doesn't close that gap for me. The 2nd and 3rd and worthless to me in trades like this.