Page 2 of 3

Re: Is this trade worth vetoing?

Posted: Tue Sep 10, 2019 11:48 pm
by PR0v3
Besides the fact that veto is only for collusion, I have no idea which side is getting the veto worthy part of the deal.

Re: Is this trade worth vetoing?

Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2019 3:24 am
by Lincoln18
I just wasted 6 seconds reading this.

Re: Is this trade worth vetoing?

Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2019 4:18 am
by FKC
TimeWillTell wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2019 5:48 pm a) never veto
b) this is not that bad. Looks like some people thinking they're capitalizing on week 1 hype
X2. All three players had positive performances and have great potential, but that’s an extreme overreaction to one week.

Re: Is this trade worth vetoing?

Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2019 7:37 am
by Maximus891
dblj1199 wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2019 5:53 pm
TimeWillTell wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2019 5:48 pm a) never veto
b) this is not that bad. Looks like some people thinking they're capitalizing on week 1 hype
X2
this

Re: Is this trade worth vetoing?

Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2019 8:10 am
by abloom
Definitely veto. It's a trade that you aren't involved in right? Those should always be vetoed.


All sarcasm aside.
1) the only trades that should not be allowed are trades via collusion.

2) this trade is easily even.

Re: Is this trade worth vetoing?

Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2019 8:18 am
by SpartacusPTech
What's the problem here again? :wall:

Is this some super TE premium league here? If not, there is nothing wrong with this deal.

Re: Is this trade worth vetoing?

Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2019 8:36 am
by killer_of_giants
TimeWillTell wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2019 6:52 pm
bjd5211 wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2019 6:47 pm Wtf?! How can you rationalize this remotely veto worthy?
Yeah I'd like to hear the argument as well, please
my guess is, the OP had a "better offer" (in his mind...) for one of those pieces, and got snubbed.



Slackalacker wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2019 8:24 pm I’d be scared of what other trades have been previously vetoed if this is considered a grey area in your league
scared? i'm curious! :lol:

Re: Is this trade worth vetoing?

Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2019 8:37 am
by cptjonesb
TimeWillTell wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2019 5:48 pm a) never veto
b) this is not that bad. Looks like some people thinking they're capitalizing on week 1 hype
X whatever number we are on

Re: Is this trade worth vetoing?

Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2019 9:58 am
by Goddard
I can't believe people still ask veto questions on here. The answers are always the same.

Also, veto is not for collusion. If there's collusion, you kick both owners out the league no questions asked.

Re: Is this trade worth vetoing?

Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2019 10:01 am
by shiningaxl
looks fair

Re: Is this trade worth vetoing?

Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2019 10:27 am
by saw061600
NO! No Collusion equals NO VETO!

Re: Is this trade worth vetoing?

Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2019 10:28 am
by GridironGuerilla
No. And I didn't read the OP or the thread. We know collusion is the only legit reason, and that is about as rare as unicorns in my experience.

Re: Is this trade worth vetoing?

Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2019 11:08 am
by 24FlavorsofFun
Nothing about that is vetoable.

Seems more you or some leaguemates are mad you missed out?

Re: Is this trade worth vetoing?

Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2019 11:13 am
by murphysxm
The fact that I honestly don't know which side you think is lopsided....

Re: Is this trade worth vetoing?

Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2019 12:43 pm
by Oddball456
murphysxm wrote: Wed Sep 11, 2019 11:13 am The fact that I honestly don't know which side you think is lopsided....
x2...