Harry or Montgomery at 1.04

[Mr. Reid]

Need some rebuild advice. Looking ahead at next years talent, am I better off taking Harry or Montgomery at 1.04 this year? I'm not expecting to compete this year, ultimately trying to figure out if I should draft Harry and allow him to develop and then target a top RB or QB in next years draft. I like Montgomery more from 2019 standpoint, but once again, I'm not expecting to compete this year and the RB depth seems really strong next year. I'm expecting top three picks to be Murray, Haskins and Jacobs.

SF league with a roster of QB, QB, RB, RB, WR, WR, WR, Flex, TE, K, DEF (14 teams)

Current Roster:
QB: Mariota, Stafford
RB: Chubb, Penny, Lewis
WR: Cooper, Kupp, C. Davis, Sutton
TE: Gesiski

[DynastyDabbler]

Based off your roster, I'm leaning more towards Montgomery. It's hard to project what position your going to take in next year's draft. It's sooo far away and a lot can happen to your roster and the 2020 prospects between now and then.

[FuzzySignificance]

just because you're rebuilding doesn't mean you can't trade rookies, so take the guy that's going to have more value this season, for me that's most likely to be Montgomery.

[I-Spygate]

Based off your roster, I'm leaning more towards Montgomery. It's hard to project what position your going to take in next year's draft. It's sooo far away and a lot can happen to your roster and the 2020 prospects between now and then.

I agree with this. Most wr’s typically take a bit of time to develop and although you are rebuilding, by the end of that time Brady may be gone. With no clear qb path for the patriots, it makes things a bit difficult with the Harry evaluation (other than he’s a very good wr).

[Cherokee]

Regardless of roster people should have Montgomery ahead of Harry with and early pick. Who went top 3? Curious

[UsualSuspects]

Draft for value.
Trade for need.
Sometimes it's easier said then done but it almost always is the right move.

[QB Browns]

Draft for value.
Trade for need.
Sometimes it's easier said then done but it almost always is the right move.

Hadn't thought about this but some good dynasty philosophy right here ^^^

[Mr. Reid]

Appreciate everyone's feedback. The draft isn't for a couple more weeks, but 99% sure the top two picks will be Murray and Haskins. Jacobs isn't a lock to go 3rd, but probably will.

[Gator Sens]

Draft for value.
Trade for need.
Sometimes it's easier said then done but it almost always is the right move.

Great thought here.

[dcr1984]

Why isn’t sanders in this discussion? I prefer him to Montgomery, and sanders vs harry would be my debate.

[srlarson]

Montgomery easy.....can trade him for more than Harry......

[PercyR1]

Montgomery and not close

[IR1]

Like Harry, but I think Montgomery has more value. Maybe look to trade back?

[RCS]

I would take N'Keal over Montgomery and actually have.

[SteveMaddensShoes]

The only reason to draft Monty over Harry is to flip him but if he happens to under preform(yes, this does happen as hard as it is to believe at this point in the year where every rookie is a lock to be top 10 at their position) I'd go Harry for talent and rebuild. He is much more insulated imo. Yes, WR's bust as well but they carry more value longer while you rebuild, imo. Harry doesn't have to do anything this year and he will still hold some value. If he flashes at all he'll be worth more. If Monty doesn't flash then he is done. Just how it works in the RB world.

There is no way to know who will be worth more long term but Harry checks more boxes without a doubt.