Page 1 of 1

Watson + ? = Barkley

Posted: Sat Jul 06, 2019 6:27 pm
by blemly
Title pretty much says it all. I’m toying with scraping the orphan I’ve taken over (Team 3 below) and am thinking about starting with a big QB upgrade.

What on top of Watson would you want to give up Barkley? A 1st? A young RB like Penny/Mack?

Re: Watson + ? = Barkley

Posted: Sat Jul 06, 2019 6:44 pm
by Gator Sens
Based on SF values, a 1st would be big in Hope's of grabbing another QB next year in the draft.

Re: Watson + ? = Barkley

Posted: Sat Jul 06, 2019 8:46 pm
by repkllrs
If the 1st is projected top 3, that would work. I don’t think it would be enough otherwise.

Re: Watson + ? = Barkley

Posted: Sun Jul 07, 2019 1:15 am
by DonBrazi
I'm not a big Watson fan.. But I'd take him straight up over Barkley in a SF. So any gravy is nice for me.

Re: Watson + ? = Barkley

Posted: Sun Jul 07, 2019 5:14 am
by jwconnel
Even in a superflex, if you're talking about rebuilding then you have to keep Barkley. He is the best building block to have. If you're set on Watson, then yeah, I would need at least a guaranteed early 2020 1st and maybe a 2nd to even consider.

Re: Watson + ? = Barkley

Posted: Sun Jul 07, 2019 9:56 pm
by WhatWouldDitkaDo
I'd ask for Watson + 1st, but I'm not sure if the Watson owner would be willing to pay that.

Re: Watson + ? = Barkley

Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2019 6:26 am
by Dynasty_Analyst
DonBrazi wrote: Sun Jul 07, 2019 1:15 am I'm not a big Watson fan.. But I'd take him straight up over Barkley in a SF. So any gravy is nice for me.
With all due respect that's crazy. Barkley and Mahomes are 1a and 1b in superflex for me at least. It would take a first plus more for me to move either of those guys for watson

Re: Watson + ? = Barkley

Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2019 7:53 am
by Goddard
I highly doubt you're getting a 1st on top of Watson in a SF. If you really want to move Barkley and shake things up, you should package him with one of your QBs and ask for a boatload in return. No need in having 4 starting QBs if you move Barkley for Watson+. I'd think Barkley and Rosen can get you Watson and another very good player with maybe even a pick on top.

Re: Watson + ? = Barkley

Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2019 10:52 am
by BigBawseRoss
why dont you just try to win a title with your pretty good team? i think you should stop thinking about blowing it up. also almost every barkley deal ive seen this offseason i felt the guy trading away barkley lost. doesnt mean you couldnt win a deal but thought i would throw it out there, what seems like a good idea could be the biggest mistake you make.