Page 1 of 2

pick 1.07

Posted: Wed May 15, 2019 10:47 am
by joeya2001
With my pick in my SF

Haskins, Hockerson, Faint and the Browns are left.

who would you take?

idk that I already have 5 QBs and a ton of TEs lol I'm hoarding them

Re: pick 1.07

Posted: Wed May 15, 2019 10:50 am
by BigBawseRoss
id take a running back lol what is going on man you have 1!!!! trade for a running back prior to making a pick please

Re: pick 1.07

Posted: Wed May 15, 2019 10:52 am
by abloom
No idea why you have so many QBs in a 10 team SF league....

I'd wait with the pick on the clock and start shopping some of your TEs and QBs for some RB help.

Re: pick 1.07

Posted: Wed May 15, 2019 10:55 am
by joeya2001
sigh....

Re: pick 1.07

Posted: Wed May 15, 2019 10:59 am
by Gator Sens
I think you need to take an RB here. Whoever is left with the most upside/best opportunity.

Re: pick 1.07

Posted: Wed May 15, 2019 11:05 am
by abloom
joeya2001 wrote: Wed May 15, 2019 10:55 amsigh....
Another option: see if you can trade it for a 2020 1st. should be better RBs there.

Re: pick 1.07

Posted: Wed May 15, 2019 12:36 pm
by Huddle3233
Take Montgomery, Singletary or Henderson. you need RB. Or take Paris Campbell. No on another qb or te

Re: pick 1.07

Posted: Wed May 15, 2019 6:55 pm
by frisco86
sounds like you have a fetish for QB and TE. Don't know why, but get help and get some RB's

Re: pick 1.07

Posted: Wed May 15, 2019 7:02 pm
by LMS123
Piling on, somehow get a rb

Re: pick 1.07

Posted: Wed May 15, 2019 7:04 pm
by M-Dub
Disagree with those suggesting you draft for need at 1.07. Assuming Sanders, Jacobs and Montgomery are gone, any other RB would be a pretty significant reach at 1.07. I’d try to trade down if possible and see if you can grab 2-3 RBs. Guys like Henderson, Hill, Williams, Singletary, Armstead, etc. If that’s not feasible, you’ve gotta take BPA, which would be Haskins or AJB out of the guys you listed, unless Campbell is still there, in which case it’s him and not close.

Re: pick 1.07

Posted: Wed May 15, 2019 7:20 pm
by The Red Rooster
Always always always take BPA with premium picks. Always. Its easier to trade players that produce while on your bench, then it is to trade a reach that's flopping while in your starting lineup.

Re: pick 1.07

Posted: Wed May 15, 2019 7:37 pm
by vixen
how about trying to trade the pick for someone like Mack...or D Freeman...

Re: pick 1.07

Posted: Wed May 15, 2019 9:00 pm
by Hottoddies
The Red Rooster wrote: Wed May 15, 2019 7:20 pm Always always always take BPA with premium picks. Always. Its easier to trade players that produce while on your bench, then it is to trade a reach that's flopping while in your starting lineup.
This sounds like someone you should listen to. The season is still a long ways off. You have time to trade for a RB later.

Re: pick 1.07

Posted: Thu May 16, 2019 2:03 am
by MontrealBen
Hottoddies wrote: Wed May 15, 2019 9:00 pm
The Red Rooster wrote: Wed May 15, 2019 7:20 pm Always always always take BPA with premium picks. Always. Its easier to trade players that produce while on your bench, then it is to trade a reach that's flopping while in your starting lineup.
This sounds like someone you should listen to. The season is still a long ways off. You have time to trade for a RB later.
This. And I don't understand how Haskins is still on the board at 1.07 in a superflex. He has to be the pick. Or make it known to the league that you're going to take him, and see if anyone will pay up with a 2020 1st + a useable RB. He should have been the no-brainer 1.02.

Re: pick 1.07

Posted: Thu May 16, 2019 5:13 am
by abloom
MontrealBen wrote: Thu May 16, 2019 2:03 am
Hottoddies wrote: Wed May 15, 2019 9:00 pm
The Red Rooster wrote: Wed May 15, 2019 7:20 pm Always always always take BPA with premium picks. Always. Its easier to trade players that produce while on your bench, then it is to trade a reach that's flopping while in your starting lineup.
This sounds like someone you should listen to. The season is still a long ways off. You have time to trade for a RB later.
This. And I don't understand how Haskins is still on the board at 1.07 in a superflex. He has to be the pick. Or make it known to the league that you're going to take him, and see if anyone will pay up with a 2020 1st + a useable RB. He should have been the no-brainer 1.02.
Because its a 10 team league. Just like why no one is valuing the other 5 QBs he has. There is a huge difference between a 10 and a 12 team SF league.

10 team SF league plays more like a 16 team 1 qb league.