Update: 1.01 or Diggs, Starting SF next season

[cd6696]

I’ve got the 1.01. Been offered Diggs straight up.

League will be transitioning to superflex in a year or two, voting for when is currently taking place.

We give 0.25 ppcarry. So rbs are also very valuable. I’ve got a lot of good young wr.

I only have cousins at qb. Keryon at rb. But Julio Kirk pettis parker Ridley at WR.

I’ve got quite a few moves to make. Does the difference between 1.01 and Diggs make you side with Diggs, or do I go qb/rb with the 1.01?

[Gator Sens]

With the league going to SF, might be worth holding the pick and taking Murray for the future format.

[killer_of_giants]

get diggs, win before the shift, then adapt to SF.

unless you think murray becomes a top 5 QB.

[IR1]

If you aren't competing I'd be tempted to take Murray and get ready for SF

[The Red Rooster]

In a year or two? If this isnt set, I would take Diggs for sure. Actually, I would take Diggs regardless. Out of curiosity, is this the commish making the deal? I think if you guys are going to super flex, that should be decided (specifically when) before this rookie draft.

[cd6696]

I am the commish. It will be decided before our draft kicks off. Currently the vote is split 4/4 with 4 still to vote between starting in 2020 or 21

[The Red Rooster]

I am the commish. It will be decided before our draft kicks off. Currently the vote is split 4/4 with 4 still to vote between starting in 2020 or 21

If there is a possibility of this going into effect in 2020...I do not think you should make this trade before that is resolved. Changes like this are big and a perceived unfair advantage (whether true or not) can have a negative impact on the league (i.e., the commish made a trade and then this went into effect). Just my two cents and certainly not questioning your motives.

[cd6696]

I am the commish. It will be decided before our draft kicks off. Currently the vote is split 4/4 with 4 still to vote between starting in 2020 or 21

If there is a possibility of this going into effect in 2020...I do not think you should make this trade before that is resolved. Changes like this are big and a perceived unfair advantage (whether true or not) can have a negative impact on the league (i.e., the commish made a trade and then this went into effect). Just my two cents and certainly not questioning your motives.

I do know exactly what you mean. I actually took over the league because the commish didn’t realize how shady his actions seemed on a regular basis. I won’t be pulling the trigger on any deal until voting is resolved. The change is happening, the owners voted on that already. Now just a matter of when. Appreciate the response.

[Goddard]

It doesn't sound like you know when or if the league is transitioning to a SF. If you know it's happening for sure and it's soon, I guess take the 1.01 and draft Murray. Otherwise, I'd rather have Diggs.

[cd6696]

It doesn't sound like you know when or if the league is transitioning to a SF. If you know it's happening for sure and it's soon, I guess take the 1.01 and draft Murray. Otherwise, I'd rather have Diggs.

The league is 100% transitioning to a SF. The only remaining bit to be decided is how soon. It is currently split between 2020 or 2021. Based on your reply, I’m assuming you’d hold, and take Murray?

[BradysBunch]

Either way... keeping the pick

[cd6696]

It has been decided. We will be starting Superflex in 2020. I have the 1.01. Other owner has now come back with Diggs and 2.05 for the 1.01?
Thoughts now that it's been decided?

[hoos89]

I'd probably draft Murray unless you think Diggs wins you a title before the switch to SF.

[Chris_R]

TAKE MURRAY!!! He will be worth 3x Diggs when the format changes, he'll be a stud in 1QB leagues and gold in SF. Take him, especially because you have 1 QB it's an easy decision, and if you wanna get a WR for him do it when it changes. A good young QB in a SF should net you a top 5 WR plus some and most people never trade top 10 QBs in SF unless it's a haul. Secure your 2 good young QBs and then never worry about the position again for 7 years.


He is trying to capitalize on great value at a discount before it changes.