RB Need at 1.03, take Harry anyway if available?

[sammyz]

Team in Sig, 10 team .5 ppr. Just moved 1.10, Duke Johnson and Trey Burton for 1.03 and 2.03, still own 2.10 (league champ last year)

Do I have enough at RB to make another run this year or do I really need to spend 1.03 on Sanders or Montgomery? I full expect Jacobs to go first and will wind up with either Sanders, Montgomery or Harry at 1.03. I think Harry is the best prospect but league loves to go RB heavy and you can almost never trade for them. Barring getting the best long term player I'd like a player that I can flip for more value mid season for next year. League mates and I are from Philly so I'm making a guess on Jacobs and Sanders going first.

With my team would you go Montgomery or Harry? Would it be Harry or Sanders?

[abloom]

Sanders if he's there. otherwise with that team I'm okay going with Montgomery with a plan on using him to compete for the title this year. Harry while potentially better than either Sanders or Montgomery, I don't think will help you much this year.

[crip7300]

I would take Sanders if he is there, but Montgomery would work as well. I think Harry is the best long term asset but you are in win now mode. Have you thought about packaging the 1.03 and Guice and going after a 2nd tier RB, someone like Mixon, Conner, Bell, DJ, or Gordon.

[The Red Rooster]

Team in Sig, 10 team .5 ppr. Just moved 1.10, Duke Johnson and Trey Burton for 1.03 and 2.03, still own 2.10 (league champ last year)

Do I have enough at RB to make another run this year or do I really need to spend 1.03 on Sanders or Montgomery? I full expect Jacobs to go first and will wind up with either Sanders, Montgomery or Harry at 1.03. I think Harry is the best prospect but league loves to go RB heavy and you can almost never trade for them. Barring getting the best long term player I'd like a player that I can flip for more value mid season for next year. League mates and I are from Philly so I'm making a guess on Jacobs and Sanders going first.

With my team would you go Montgomery or Harry? Would it be Harry or Sanders?

Take your BPA always. Thats how you build dynasties.

[Goddard]

Whoever is still there between Harry and Sanders. If both are there, take Harry. You can then trade Moore, Godwin, or Washington (or some combination of those players) for a RB.

[Nightmares]

Rooster and Goddard sum up my thoughts. BPA and trade for need.

[saw061600]

Piling on the always BPA. If you believe that's Harry, you take Harry. Need and positional value (for future trade capital) should be secondary to drafting overall talent.

[Gator Sens]

Harry or Sanders or BPA

[badbuddah]

A lot of posters here are missing the point. It sounds like you are in a league like mine where all the owners massively over value RBs so they won't make an equitable trade for one. I think in that case you take Sanders, maybe Montgomery. They aren't massive downgrades from Harry anyway. I stacked Wrs for years but always lost in the playoffs to teams with top 5 RBs. The guy with 3 of the last 5 year's titles always had the best RBs. It can't be overstated how important they are.

[IR1]

Piling on the always BPA. If you believe that's Harry, you take Harry. Need and positional value (for future trade capital) should be secondary to drafting overall talent.

X2, trade for a rb later

[Titans95]

Call me crazy but I think Montgomery IS the BPA if Sanders and Jacobs are gone. He's poised to be heavily involved as a rookie on a great offense. Give me that all day over a receiver that isn't a home run prospect. Most receivers take 2-3 years to develop. Why take harry and wait on him when you can get Montgomery and reap the benefits year 1 and then trade him if you don't believe in him long term.

[badbuddah]

Call me crazy but I think Montgomery IS the BPA if Sanders and Jacobs are gone. He's poised to be heavily involved as a rookie on a great offense. Give me that all day over a receiver that isn't a home run prospect. Most receivers take 2-3 years to develop. Why take harry and wait on him when you can get Montgomery and reap the benefits year 1 and then trade him if you don't believe in him long term.

I don't disagree with you, but Chicago is a "great offense?" Idk about that. Mitch has to take a step forward this year. I'd take Sanders if he is there at 3, but it really sounds like this guy's draft could go Jacobs>Sanders then only RB feasibly left is Montgomery.

[Furlo610]

From the looks of your roster your biggest need is TE....use the 1.03 to trade down a few spots and pick up assests for the 2020 class if you can, draft TJ this year. The RB class next year is head over heels better than this class already

[Titans95]

Call me crazy but I think Montgomery IS the BPA if Sanders and Jacobs are gone. He's poised to be heavily involved as a rookie on a great offense. Give me that all day over a receiver that isn't a home run prospect. Most receivers take 2-3 years to develop. Why take harry and wait on him when you can get Montgomery and reap the benefits year 1 and then trade him if you don't believe in him long term.

I don't disagree with you, but Chicago is a "great offense?" Idk about that. Mitch has to take a step forward this year. I'd take Sanders if he is there at 3, but it really sounds like this guy's draft could go Jacobs>Sanders then only RB feasibly left is Montgomery.

Maybe "great" was a bit of an exaggeration but Nagy's offense was extremely creative and successful that vastly improved in year one that has a top 10 Offensive Line. Chicago was 11th in total rushing yards and 9th in total scoring.

[sammyz]

A lot of posters here are missing the point. It sounds like you are in a league like mine where all the owners massively over value RBs so they won't make an equitable trade for one. I think in that case you take Sanders, maybe Montgomery. They aren't massive downgrades from Harry anyway. I stacked Wrs for years but always lost in the playoffs to teams with top 5 RBs. The guy with 3 of the last 5 year's titles always had the best RBs. It can't be overstated how important they are.

Yes, this. I may by overestimating but I could probably trade a productive RB1 for a decent TE (outside the top 3) and a 1st next year.

I'm more interested in Harry but it's hard to pass up RBs in a league where most of them are untouchable