(Poll Attached) Micheal Thomas vs Chubb + Lockett 0.5 PPR

[PennyLenny]

In a vacuum using a 0.5 PPR format would you trade Micheal Thomas for Nick Chubb + Tyler Lockett?

[Nimrod]

its hard to answer in a vacuum since there are so many valuables to consider. league size, salary league, keeper settings, etc. what are those?

[JDogil12]

Vacuum give me MT

[ColdZealDonkeyStrike]

That's light for MT. Needs another player with 1st round value on the Chubb side.

[Dirty Mike&the Boys]

This all boils down to if you think Chubb will be a stud, which I think he will. Also, RB1 are tougher to find and .5 ppr only hurts Thomas. Thomas also has uncertainty long term due to Brees age.

With all that being said, I still think MT should be demanding a little more, maybe a 2nd this year.

[infamousbacardi]

Wouldn't add much more to Chubb side. I actually like the Chubb/Lockett side as is for what it's worth. In a 1 PPR it may be worth an add, but the main difference here is Thomas' usage over Lockett, w/o the extra .5 I think it's close as is. Big fan of Chubb as I bought him up this year the week he became the starter, so maybe a little biased, but is what it is.

[WhatWouldDitkaDo]

Tough call. In a vacuum, Chubb by the tiniest margin in 0.5 PPR. If it were full PPR, I might lean the Thomas side.

[Goddard]

I'd keep MT.

[The.Big.Spank]

Too tough to call in a vacuum.

[hockeyBjj]

Vaccum MT, depending on roster construction this is the approximate value sacrifice to fix an rb hole for a team with a good next man up for starting wr

[Yogurt]

I love Chubb but WRs typically produce at a higher level for a lot longer than RBs.