Could this get Kelce?

[keebs3]

Trying to make a run for team 2,

Do you think Engram, P. Lindsay, and a 2nd would be enough for Kelce?

Would Dalvin and Rudolph be too much?

[Adam_172]

I don't think that would be enough for Kelce. Kelce is a certified stud and TE is the hardest postion to find continued production from. Whilst Engram is a solid TE in return, Lindsay and a 2nd add nothing really

[slaughterrt]

Yeah I don’t think that does it, but if the other guys loves Lindsay, then give it a try

[killer_of_giants]

I wouldn't take Dalvin and Rudolph for Kelce.

[keebs3]

Don't you guys think Dalvin and Engram would be a bit much for Kelce? Or am I just undervaluing him?

[Philly Special]

I wouldn't take this as I dont see long term production from Lindsay. I like Engram as the replacement TE, but I'd need more than Linsday and a 2nd.

[jcc6fd]

Don't you guys think Dalvin and Engram would be a bit much for Kelce? Or am I just undervaluing him?

That could work depending on the Kelce's owners goals for this season. If he's a rebuilder he might take that. If he's competing probably not

[thomasscheeks]

Don't you guys think Dalvin and Engram would be a bit much for Kelce? Or am I just undervaluing him?

That's a really strong offer but I wouldn't take it. Kelce is very hard to pry from his owners. He's a huge positional advantage so you gotta really make it worth their while

[Goddard]

Dalvin and Engram would probably be too much.

[Dibbles]

Agree, Dalvin + Engram is too much - would def try the Lindsey offer and circle back if shot down.

[Multiple Scorgasms]

I wouldn't take D+E for Kelce at all. Wouldn't even think about it.

It seems like in almost every single trade discussion thread, the strongest side is the one with the best player (assuming that player is a super-stud, as Kelce is). The multiple assets people either want to give up or are considering for their guy just never seem enough, and it's usually too volume-orientated. In my experience stars win leagues, not depth. Kelce is probably near untradeable if you're a contender; why would you sacrifice the huge advantage he gives you week in and week out at such a barren position?

For the OP I'd give whatever it takes. You have the RB/WR elite starters to make it worthwhile having a TE to match.

[WhatWouldDitkaDo]

I haven't played a ton of best ball, but I would think Kelce is worth a tiny bit less in that format? The biggest problem with streaming TEs is predicting which weeks guys like Jared Cook or Evan Engram will have the TDs or big gains, but best ball makes owning a bunch of low-end TE1s more palatable.

Personally, I'd offer Mixon + Engram for Kelce + 2019 1st. I think Cook will outscore Mixon ROS, as I have little faith in CIN's offense without AJ Green.

[dblj1199]

I think I’d rather hold your depth a rb and hope one of your tes has a big game in best ball each week. Or possibly look to buy low on Gronk and hope he turns things around.