Dalvin Cook for Julio?

[BHerm24]

So curious wwhat the opinion is here. The official offer is Dalvin Cook and Golden Tate for Lamar Miller and Julio jones. I know Jones is getting up there in age, but can Cook produce like he did last year for years to come? My team right now is pretty solid so I am trying to think if I should just go all in for this year or holdout for Cooks potential future years

[Vcize]

I like Cook > Julio and Tate > Miller, so I will take that side pretty easily.

[hudini33]

I have the Cook side here, but I think it's closer than the responses I'm expecting. That being said, I think everyone is vastly underrating Miller. Anyway, Cook side because of age mostly

[Goddard]

Fair in value, but I'd probably keep your side.

[Ice]

Based on your rules and draft position, I would take the Julio side as he gets you much closer to a title this season. Miller will put up solid numbers and you don't keep many players.

[jcc6fd]

FWIW I completed a startup a month ago and grabbed Julio in the 3rd round and Dalvin cook was taken a whole 10 spots earlier. I don't think their respective "rankings" have caught up with their perceived I think the Julio/Miller side is coming in pretty light. I think the value gap is nearly a 1st

League is full PPR where you can start up to 6 WR (most likely 5 as one spot is a superflex) and only have to start 2 RBs (can startup 4/5 of them as well).

[stigskol]

Cook side.

[TroyH]

I had Julio and it got to the point to where no one would accept a trade like this. I think Julio still has 3 years of high end fantasy value, but everyone is pretty low on him right now and I assume the other guy is to. I think the value is definitely there in this trade, but I would try and see if you can get a pick added just cause he offered it.