1.02+ for 1.01+

[auggiedoggies]

12 team PPR Superflex league with RB heavy scoring (.2 points per carry)

I'm a team that's looking to contend. Would you trade:

Dalvin Cook/Mckinnon/1.02/2020 1st

for:

1.01/1.12/Jarvis Landry


My initial thought is that it's a hefty price to pay to move up to 1.01 from 1.02, but wanted to make sure I'm not off.

[TheTroll]

I would keep the Cook side by a wide margin. You will get a great player in 1.02. McKinnon is in a prove it situation.

[Goddard]

I think it's close. Since the 2020 1st is so far out and hard to project, I'd probably lean towards the 1.01/Landry side.

[TheEastWest]

I’d go with the 1.01 side .

[honcho55]

Depends on the rest of your RB depth, and if you think Landry can stay as productive in Cleveland as he was in Miami. Giving up Cook/McKinnon/Guice(or whoever you like or whoever moves up there after the NFL draft) for Barkley, thats 3 fairly startable guys. Might be an okay RB at 12 too who knows.

For straight value, 1.2 and Cook vs 1.1 and 1.12 is pretty close to right, since its a small overpay, which you have to do for 1.1, it seems. Personally I wouldnt take McKinnon and a 2020 1st for Landry, to finish off the trade.

[topher]

No way I’d make this trade with .2 ppc

You’re trading 3 RB for 1, even if that one is Barkley. Guice is a pretty damn good RB also.....

[BradysBunch]

cook side. But I am not high on landry.

[sloth8u]

I don't have a huge gap from 1 to cook. so 2 and the rest for landry and 12 seems expensive. not sure id give 2 for landry and 12...let alone adding McKinnon and the future 1.

[jski33]

I would hold

[jpusmc0311]

I like the 1.02 side better. I don't like Landry's situation.