D Henry and Woods vs Hunt and Funchness?

[hockeyBjj]

Team 2 in sig. Got a blank trade on his end of "what do you want for them?" for Derrick Henry and Woods. D Henry, well we all know where he's at and finally poised to take over. Few question marks I'm not the biggest fan of primarily being why the heck didn't he wrestle more snaps and the starting role from Murray like he should have? Woods, I feel this is a sell high time

His team isn't all that great, Antonio Brown, Hunt (also has Ware), Marvin Jones and Devin Funchness are really the only ones that I took notice off. He also has pick 1.3

Would you offer this? I have no clue if this would even be considered or laughed at and rejected on his end, but while I'm not 100% sold on Henry, I'm also not super sold on Hunt

[HughHoney]

I think it’s too light to even be countered. For me:

Hunt>>Henry
Funchess>Woods

If I owned him, I wouldn’t sell Hunt alone for that.

[RB6]

Hunt side pretty easily. You'll have to add something.

[Goddard]

I'd make the offer since he's coming to you, but with the expectation of it getting rejected or countered.

[hockeyBjj]

Also thinking the 1.3 now. Would you move Henry (+ Woods potentially) for the 1.3 and likely whichever is left of Guice or Chubb?

[WhatWouldDitkaDo]

I disagree...you already have Gurley and Kamara (and Hyde), so it's not like you're desperate for help at RB. You have great QBs and WRs too. I would argue that Hunt > Henry but not by a ton; Ware and West will steal some touches whereas Henry will at the very least be the 1st and 2nd down RB in TEN next year even if they sign or draft a pass-catching RB. And this might be against the consensus, but Woods > Funchess for me. I'd rather explore packaging Robinson + your 2018 1st (assuming 1.12 if it's yours?) for a guy like Gronk or Ertz + 2nd to upgrade your TE position.

[skip]

If we knew for sure that Henry were taking over in Tennessee this upcoming season then it's closer than some are making it. Still, at this time, I definitely prefer Hunt to Henry. I concur with Ditka here that Woods > Funchess though I think it could be argued they are pretty even.

[gunzwil guinea pigs]

hunt is clearly better then henry IMO

[lukkynumber13]

I'm far from a huge supporter of Funchess and Hunt, but this is a great trade if you can do it.

[hockeyBjj]

I disagree...you already have Gurley and Kamara (and Hyde), so it's not like you're desperate for help at RB. You have great QBs and WRs too. I would argue that Hunt > Henry but not by a ton; Ware and West will steal some touches whereas Henry will at the very least be the 1st and 2nd down RB in TEN next year even if they sign or draft a pass-catching RB. And this might be against the consensus, but Woods > Funchess for me. I'd rather explore packaging Robinson + your 2018 1st (assuming 1.12 if it's yours?) for a guy like Gronk or Ertz + 2nd to upgrade your TE position.

I agree. This 2 for 2 trade I'm looking to make work by upgrading Henry to Hunt, but downgrading Woods to Funchness

What you say about persuing a TE based off our team needs makes a lot of sense. Start 3 WRs plus a flex, and there's a RB/TE flex, so Arob as our WR3-4 would be very nice to have back, but perhaps there's something else that can work with our first to upgrade Hooper/Doyle

[hockeyBjj]

So he just countered D Henry and Woods for Funchness, Terrence Williams, and a 3rd. I don't think anything is going to work out with this trade partner lol. I expected a counter, but thought it'd be one that got us closer to fair value not threw the pendulum out the window

He has Antonio Brown, so I thought this was going to be a case of rebuilding team selling an older stud to the league champ so they can repeat, for their young talent. But if this is all his counter is yuck