Is there a trade to make?

[Rams Fan]

For Team 1:

Guy is looking to upgrade his TE position and has inquired about Gronk. My teams biggest weakness is RB.
His RB's are: Kamara, Hyde, Miller, K Drake, Foreman.
His WR's: Landry, D Thomas, J Gordon
His QB's: Stafford, Luck, Wentz

Anyone see something I could propose between my roster and his?

Thanks all

[WhatWouldDitkaDo]

I would not sell Gronk unless the deal involves getting back one of Stafford, Luck, Wentz, or Kamara. You don't need any of his WRs given your depth at the position.

[FantasyFreakGuru]

Sell Rudolph.

[Rams Fan]

Sell Rudolph.

You think Rudolph for Foreman?

[skip]

Though I'm not a Foreman fan, I'd move Gronk for Miller/Foreman. Miller should be the starter but Foreman gives you insurance in case the Texans make a change.

[FKC]

Sell Rudolph.

You think Rudolph for Foreman?

When I saw Foreman on his roster, I was thinking you should try to acquire him. I would try Rudolph for Foreman. I like Foreman and I think you can acquire him on the cheap right now.

[BradysBunch]

Agree with Skip. Also I think you could get a 2nd. Thinking from his view.. getting his top TE and giving up an Miller and foreman is pretty good..so add a 2nd to even it out would not be out of the question.

[WhatWouldDitkaDo]

Though I'm not a Foreman fan, I'd move Gronk for Miller/Foreman. Miller should be the starter but Foreman gives you insurance in case the Texans make a change.

What?? I wouldn't sell Gronk for Miller/Foreman unless I'm getting back at least a 1st on top.

[Goddard]

You're not going to get Kamara for Gronk, so maybe try for Hyde and Luck/Wentz.

[whodunnit]

Though I'm not a Foreman fan, I'd move Gronk for Miller/Foreman. Miller should be the starter but Foreman gives you insurance in case the Texans make a change.

What?? I wouldn't sell Gronk for Miller/Foreman unless I'm getting back at least a 1st on top.

this. I'd have to have Kamara to move Gronk out of the players you listed. I'd pass on any other offer.

[Rams Fan]

So with some back and forth maybe the only chance of a deal looks like: Gronk/Dalton for Hyde/Luck.

Worth pursuing or keep Gronk at this point?

[Goddard]

So with some back and forth maybe the only chance of a deal looks like: Gronk/Dalton for Hyde/Luck.

Worth pursuing or keep Gronk at this point?

I like it, especially since it's similar to what I suggested lol. In a SF, Luck is easily the best piece in this deal.

[Rams Fan]

So with some back and forth maybe the only chance of a deal looks like: Gronk/Dalton for Hyde/Luck.

Worth pursuing or keep Gronk at this point?

I like it, especially since it's similar to what I suggested lol. In a SF, Luck is easily the best piece in this deal.

That's true. I'll keep you posted if it goes through or not.

[block2323]

I would trade gronk/Dalton for Luck/Hyde in a superflex without much thought.

I definitely would NOT trade gronk for foreman/Lamar...that's a complete undersell and I would much rather have gronk than that.

[treble83]

So with some back and forth maybe the only chance of a deal looks like: Gronk/Dalton for Hyde/Luck.

Worth pursuing or keep Gronk at this point?

Worth pursuing. I think Luck has a higher ceiling than Dalton.