1.02 1.04 and alshon for nuk and 1.01

[teese35]

I give Alshon 1.02 and 1.04
I get Nuk and 1.01

Team in sig. do I make this deal and take fournette 1 overall or keep picks and end up with 2 of these 3 mixon mccaferty and cook.

[Bigsexy85]

I'd stick with the Alshon side. You'd be surprised, the guy picking at 1 may take Davis. Everyone in my league swore the guy who had 1 was taking LF but he shocked us all. Too much value to be giving up for a slight upgrade at WR

[Avery]

Too much to give up considering we haven't seen any of the rookies play in the NFL. I'd rather diversify my investment with the 1.02 and 1.04/

[Kramer]

I'd prefer Alshon side as well, but it's close.

[SoShady]

I would stick with what you have.

[Goddard]

Agree with others, it's close, but keep Alshon and the picks.

[Shcritters]

Piling on, stick with what you have.

[teese35]

Thanks for help. I'm sticking with my squad rejected the trade.

[Fantasy>>>Reality]

i would have accepted

[IR1]

Nuk side for me

[moishetreats]

For me, I actually prefer the 1.02 to 1.01 (well, that is, I have Mixon at 1.01). In other words, I'd see if you could get value back by keeping out those picks.

In other words, it's really Alshon + 1.04 for Nuk. I'd take make that trade EVERY time.

[Han]

While I think Nuk > Alshon by a bit, you have a solid chance of two stud RBs with those early picks. Mixon plus one of CMac/Cook is better than Fournette margin with WRs. And you might br able to do Fournette AND Mixon

[Plank]

I'd be doing this kind of happy dance .. I love Nuk and I'd get Corey Davis ... *moon walks.

[HughHoney]

For me it's:

Nuk=Alshon+1.04
1.01>1.02

Close though as not much difference in the top 2 picks for me.

[teese35]

Would it be a good idea for me to counter with

give Alshon and 1.04
get Nuk

and draft a mixon or cmac at 1.02?