Cooks plus for gurley

[Broncopain]

Would you give up cooks plus the 1.09 for gurley. I think a straight up deal is very fair but the owner isnt budging on that.

[Generic Username]

They're a straight swap value in terms of ADP. A late 2nd at most should be added to Cooks if Gurley is the guy you want, but not a first

[Kramer]

They're a straight swap value in terms of ADP. A late 2nd at most should be added to Cooks if Gurley is the guy you want, but not a first

x2

[0crush83]

There is no reason to add to Cooks if you want Gurley. Not a big fan of his but the value is on the Cooks side IMO.

[Shonte]

I own Gurley and would probably take Cooks for him straight up at this point. I wouldn't add a first to Cooks for TG.

[BradysBunch]

I would not take cooks and the 1.9 for gurley. It is fair, but I would keep him.

[Tyrober]

I wouldn't consider adding a first. If they guy likes Gurley that much let him keep him.

[Johnny Canuck]

Would rather have Gurley. Three down RBs are hard to obtain, personally not a cooks fan, and there's just too many mouths to feed in NE. I wouldn't give up my shares of Gurley for that, but it's a fair offer.

My initial thought was that the 1.09 just doesn't move the needle at all without knowing which player has fallen to that spot. Might be a better trade to make when the draft is ongoing and the other party has some indication of who will be available at that pick

[Goddard]

If you really want Gurley, I can see adding the 1.09. However, like many above stated, a 2nd should be more than fair.