I don't have any problem with this. I just think it's interesting that you can treat the small success rate margin between Conley and Ajayi as though it's indisputable evidence in Conley's favor, but then immediately disregard a similar difference between Conley and Funchess when it doesn't favor your guy.Telperion wrote:My theory is that there is a speed floor below which a player is not a viable NFL athlete.OhCruelestRanter wrote:Sure, but not being Anquan Boldin means simply that. That's a pretty reductionist argument, it's not like Anquan Boldin is on the line between viable starter and perennial bench guy; Boldin put up 3 WR1 seasons and a bunch more WR2 seasons. Funchess doesn't have to do that to have a better career than Chris Conley.
Boldin plays a mean, physical, nasty style of football that evidently has translated into NFL success. I've seen none of those traits in Funchess so I don't see it happening. That's what I mean by not Boldin.
In light of that, I think Funchess is less likely to have success than Conley.
The charts you've compiled are great work. They are. They're an awesome reminder that guys like Dorsett shouldn't be falling behind taken 3 rounds later. But when you're arguing in favor of a 3rd round WR over a 5th round RB, those percentages are so small that you're doing yourself and all of us a disservice by using that tone. There's no need to be like DLFiend. You don't win any prizes for using phrases like "Period." You're much smarter and more reasonable than that. Again, no disrespect here. I really enjoy your posts/work.