NY Giants D/ST Fumble Recovery?

[joeday]

It shows a FR for NYG but I don't see it anywhere? I don't wanna take the point for granted in a close game. Anyone have any insight on this?

[CokeAndBacardi]

Looks like an RGIII rush before Halftime:

(:08) R.Griffin scrambles right end for 8 yards, TOUCHDOWN.
The Replay Official challenged the runner broke the plane ruling, and the play was REVERSED.
R.Griffin scrambles right end to NYG 1 for 7 yards (J.Pierre-Paul). FUMBLES (J.Pierre-Paul), ball out of bounds in End Zone, Touchback.

[joeday]

Does NYG get credit for that recovery though?

[Patmos]

No. RGIII recovered his own fumble, but because it was in the last 2 minutes of a half, it was ruled a touchback.

[Pac_Eddy]

No. RGIII recovered his own fumble, but because it was in the last 2 minutes of a half, it was ruled a touchback.

If RG3 was ruled as having lost possession, someone's got to "have" possession. I can see the Giants D getting credit for that.

[bonscott]

The plays says the ball went out of bounds out of the end zone, thus no recovery for the Giants. But by rule it's a touchback.

Similar to the Packers game, Rogers fubmled into the end zone and Lacy recovered, but it's a safety by rule since Rogers didn't recover it himself inside of two minutes. Thus the defense got a safety but no fumble recovery.

[joeday]

The plays says the ball went out of bounds out of the end zone, thus no recovery for the Giants. But by rule it's a touchback.

Similar to the Packers game, Rogers fubmled into the end zone and Lacy recovered, but it's a safety by rule since Rogers didn't recover it himself inside of two minutes. Thus the defense got a safety but no fumble recovery.

So you are saying I am going to get recalced out of a point from the sounds of it?

[bonscott]

The plays says the ball went out of bounds out of the end zone, thus no recovery for the Giants. But by rule it's a touchback.

Similar to the Packers game, Rogers fubmled into the end zone and Lacy recovered, but it's a safety by rule since Rogers didn't recover it himself inside of two minutes. Thus the defense got a safety but no fumble recovery.

So you are saying I am going to get recalced out of a point from the sounds of it?

Maybe. All depends on how Elias scores it and even if a stat change for it comes down on Thursday.

[joeday]

The plays says the ball went out of bounds out of the end zone, thus no recovery for the Giants. But by rule it's a touchback.

Similar to the Packers game, Rogers fubmled into the end zone and Lacy recovered, but it's a safety by rule since Rogers didn't recover it himself inside of two minutes. Thus the defense got a safety but no fumble recovery.

So you are saying I am going to get recalced out of a point from the sounds of it?

Maybe. All depends on how Elias scores it and even if a stat change for it comes down on Thursday.

I asked a few espn guys and they think it will stand. I hope my game doesnt come down to it though! lol