oh yeah, rg3 is closer to cam than luck is. but cam is a much better runner and more durable than rg3bluemetal wrote:In fairness, I don't watch college football as extensively....my view was that RG3 is closer to Cam than Luck is to Cam....perhaps people can correct me if I am wrong there...lbouchard wrote:Cam and RG3 aren't close in style.bluemetal wrote:Here are Manning's first two seasons as an NFL starting QBs...another thing to keep in mind is that the reason a team has a top pick is because it sucks (unless its WAS here which traded up)....I think we are fooling ourselves if we are thinking Luck will start hot. Newton's success shows RG3 can. I am actually very seriously debating waiting to trade for Luck after his owner gets impatient after 1st year....
G Att Comp Pct Att/G Yds Avg Yds/G TD TD% Int Int% Lng 20+ 40+ Sck SckY Rate
16 575 326 56.7 35.9 3,739 6.5 233.7 26 4.5 28 4.9 78T 42 8 22 109 71.2
16 533 331 62.1 33.3 4,135 7.8 258.4 26 4.9 15 2.8 80T 56 11 14 116 90.7
IND and WAS offensive personnel/scheme
Re: IND and WAS offensive personnel/scheme
Re: IND and WAS offensive personnel/scheme
So does Tom Moore and and his comments seem to favor Luck. You can find people on both sides but I personally would favor the opinion of a guy who coached QBs over a guy whose job is to watch film.ConnSKINS26 wrote:Not according to Cossell, and he seems to know his stuff.tra151 wrote:It's a pretty big deal, but from most accounts, luck feels and reacts to pressure much better than rg3 anyway
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: 81-, abloom, Ahrefs [Bot], SoftwoodGrampian and 88 guests