Lamar Jackson "the 4th year veteran."* Let's see if Hurts makes it that long.mild wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 2:48 pmHe already is poor man's Lamar Jackson. He's the QB1 in Fantasy in his 2nd year as a pro, 1st year as a proper starter. That's Lamar Jackson.halfbaked88 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 10:09 am The gamble here is if Philly decides to draft a QB.
Best case scenario Hurts becomes poor man's Lamar Jackson.
If they do draft a QB...
No "becomes" about it.
Name me the 2022 rookie QB that can come in and take Hurts' job right now right-off-the-bat as a rookie. I will wait.halfbaked88 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 24, 2021 10:09 am If they do draft a QB, Hurts loses his job for X amount of time and you have no idea where he goes or what NFL team may or may not show interest in him...
But for me, personally, if he's my only QB getting me by and I can cash out Hurts and obtain a known, secure asset with 80% the ceiling, but with a contract for the next 3 years - I'm playing safe.
Cool, yeah, trade away an asset that has already shown QB1 overall upside because you're scared he won't last. That's fine.
Last I checked, the point of Fantasy was to win. Taking the high-upside swings is exactly how you win championships. Trading that player away is how regrets are made.
I think you're nuts if you're trading Hurts away right now. He is -clearly- a hold with a value that is now skyrocketing. If you don't dig risk, and you can get off him for someone "safer" (that Mac Jones Q is a good one) then fair play to you - but this smells of Lamar all over again, the narrative is -literally- the same as it was his 2nd year when he was named the first ever unanimous MVP of the NFL.
"His legs won't last, this isn't sustainable"
"He will never be a good thrower"
"I'm thankful for the fantasy championship this year, but I'm going to get off Lamar for a safer option like Baker Mayfield or Aaron Rodgers"
When a players value is in such flux like this, with such an insane proven upside - it most often pays to hold.
I think you're drunk off the points this year. No offense.
All of these fantasy based arguments - this "is" a fantasy forum, but NFL coaching staffs do not categorize Quarterbacks by top fantasy scoring.
The lists you gave do not enter coaching evaluation rooms of how well a QB is performing.
The reality of Nick Siriani having to adjust the offense to Hurts skill set i.e. becoming more run based may not be what the Eagles see as a success as fantasy players do.
For what it's worth, it very may well be viewed as a "weakness" when it comes time to look at the future of the QB position.
I've barely begun to look at the 22' rookie class, but ultimately what we see at the QB position from a fantasy perspective varies greatly from what real football evaluators see.
If an NFL team wants to move on from a QB I have a very, very hard time believing they'll punt the year and simply draft something else. For "value."
I'm sorry that's just not how GMs and coaches think. They draft a QB and buy more audition time to keep their jobs afloat - even if it's on a whim. They coaches blame the QB to save their jobs. It's messed up, but I've seen it over and and over and over again.
There's a human element to real life football that I think is lacking in the optimistic approach to Jalen Hurts future.
You can gamble with your dynasty team and I can definitely see solid reasoning behind why you would with Jalen Hurts.
Hurts is *DOMINATING* from a fantasy perspective this year.
My point is: I don't think that fantasy success weighs heavily on whether or not Nick Siriani, Howie Roseman and the Eagles fan-base view Jalen Hurts as a long-term future QB.
And that drafting a QB, while they have the option, is definitely, 100% going to be on the table this off-season. I'm not holding him while that occurs and watching nervously as I clutch my pearls.
I'm getting what I can for him now, if I'm not a serious contender, and moving on.
I traded Hurts for George Kittle. Then moved Kittle+ for Trevor Lawrence+ (because I needed a QB.) And I am very happy with that.