Buy/Sell options 2021 in season

[Patsfan86]

Did i miss someone say AB? He is the most obvious sell out there. I was able to get a second for him and that was enough for me. A contender may even give up a first at this point for him.

Id also consider selling Nick Chubb if you arent a contender, his highest value is going to be now.

Other buys that are on the verge of becoming too expensive
Waddle
Smith
Toney

[Pullo Vision]

This might only be for deep leagues, but if you believe in his talent, Boston Scott seems a good option. He's not getting touches in a bad offense.

[Orenthal Shames]

This might only be for deep leagues, but if you believe in his talent, Boston Scott seems a good option. He's not getting touches in a bad offense.

I've been holding, but it's been rough. Care to expand on this to give your boy some hope?

[Jrblaha]

I feel like Fournette should be a buy or a sell, but idk which one, maybe that means he’s a hold.

[Cameron Giles]

Heath Cummings:

Marvin Jones, Diontae Johnson, and Brandin Cooks were all top-10 wide receivers Week 6-17 in 2020. Their ranks through Week 5 last year:

Cooks WR36
DJ WR67
Jones WR81

--

Makes me want to send feelers out for Ridley (WR38), Allen Robinson (WR61), Robby Anderson (WR70), and some others.

[Mjvb5]

Heath Cummings:

Marvin Jones, Diontae Johnson, and Brandin Cooks were all top-10 wide receivers Week 6-17 in 2020. Their ranks through Week 5 last year:

Cooks WR36
DJ WR67
Jones WR81

--

Makes me want to send feelers out for Ridley (WR38), Allen Robinson (WR61), Robby Anderson (WR70), and some others.

Not counting robby, but for the other two if someone is willing to discount a not quite yet old player who has a relatively proven track record with relative consistency year to year for a five game stretch.

[CGW]

Heath Cummings:

Marvin Jones, Diontae Johnson, and Brandin Cooks were all top-10 wide receivers Week 6-17 in 2020. Their ranks through Week 5 last year:

Cooks WR36
DJ WR67
Jones WR81

--

Makes me want to send feelers out for Ridley (WR38), Allen Robinson (WR61), Robby Anderson (WR70), and some others.

Not counting robby, but for the other two if someone is willing to discount a not quite yet old player who has a relatively proven track record with relative consistency year to year for a five game stretch.

Agree, I'd be checking on Ridley and ARob. I know as an owner I'd be lying if I said I wasn't a little frustrated with both. By year end I think we see Ridley return to form and ARob will be back to his studliness on a none bears team next year.

Anderson? Meh. Last year seems like the outlier to me. Hes a WR3 for a competitor. The other two in this conversation are WR1 or high end WR2.

[Cameron Giles]

Heath Cummings:

Marvin Jones, Diontae Johnson, and Brandin Cooks were all top-10 wide receivers Week 6-17 in 2020. Their ranks through Week 5 last year:

Cooks WR36
DJ WR67
Jones WR81

--

Makes me want to send feelers out for Ridley (WR38), Allen Robinson (WR61), Robby Anderson (WR70), and some others.

Not counting robby, but for the other two if someone is willing to discount a not quite yet old player who has a relatively proven track record with relative consistency year to year for a five game stretch.

I don't believe in it, but they do exist.

[murphysxm]

Even if Pitts does very little his value will, as a rookie in a typically slow developing position, be insulated to where he can't fall far below hock

If that holds true, then Pitts won’t be a buy for me until it continues year 2, and he finally falls well below hock. If he has to have 3 bad years for it happen he’s no longer a buy for me, so maybe timing just never works out

Nobody that invested what they invested in Pitts, and saw what he did in London is selling low. Period.

[Jrblaha]

Even if Pitts does very little his value will, as a rookie in a typically slow developing position, be insulated to where he can't fall far below hock

If that holds true, then Pitts won’t be a buy for me until it continues year 2, and he finally falls well below hock. If he has to have 3 bad years for it happen he’s no longer a buy for me, so maybe timing just never works out

Nobody that invested what they invested in Pitts, and saw what he did in London is selling low. Period.

Saying “nobody” xyz, many times will make your statement false. “Somebody” selling low after London is more probable than “nobody” doing it, imo. People make crazy trades all the time. Period.

London was without Ridley, Gage, etc. I do think the amount of people willing to sell low, lowered after London, but your statement isn’t as concrete as your language implies. In fact, imo, your statement is wrong. ‍♂️

[SteveMaddensShoes]

If that holds true, then Pitts won’t be a buy for me until it continues year 2, and he finally falls well below hock. If he has to have 3 bad years for it happen he’s no longer a buy for me, so maybe timing just never works out

Nobody that invested what they invested in Pitts, and saw what he did in London is selling low. Period.

Saying “nobody” xyz, many times will make your statement false. “Somebody” selling low after London is more probable than “nobody” doing it, imo. People make crazy trades all the time. Period.

London was without Ridley, Gage, etc. I do think the amount of people willing to sell low, lowered after London, but your statement isn’t as concrete as your language implies. In fact, imo, your statement is wrong. ‍♂️

I tried to respond with a serious counter and explanation but I just keep laughing instead.

[Jrblaha]

Nobody that invested what they invested in Pitts, and saw what he did in London is selling low. Period.

Saying “nobody” xyz, many times will make your statement false. “Somebody” selling low after London is more probable than “nobody” doing it, imo. People make crazy trades all the time. Period.

London was without Ridley, Gage, etc. I do think the amount of people willing to sell low, lowered after London, but your statement isn’t as concrete as your language implies. In fact, imo, your statement is wrong. ‍♂️

I tried to respond with a serious counter and explanation but I just keep laughing instead.

Cool story bro

[SteveMaddensShoes]

Saying “nobody” xyz, many times will make your statement false. “Somebody” selling low after London is more probable than “nobody” doing it, imo. People make crazy trades all the time. Period.

London was without Ridley, Gage, etc. I do think the amount of people willing to sell low, lowered after London, but your statement isn’t as concrete as your language implies. In fact, imo, your statement is wrong. ‍♂️

I tried to respond with a serious counter and explanation but I just keep laughing instead.

Cool story bro

I glad you liked it

[Jrblaha]

I tried to respond with a serious counter and explanation but I just keep laughing instead.

Cool story bro

I glad you liked it

I did. I especially liked the part where you were unable to seriously counter my quoted text. Which makes sense, bc what I said wasn’t wrong.

[Jrblaha]

Heath Cummings:

Marvin Jones, Diontae Johnson, and Brandin Cooks were all top-10 wide receivers Week 6-17 in 2020. Their ranks through Week 5 last year:

Cooks WR36
DJ WR67
Jones WR81

--

Makes me want to send feelers out for Ridley (WR38), Allen Robinson (WR61), Robby Anderson (WR70), and some others.

I feel like vets usually start out hotter and then cool. And younger guys the opposite. But maybe that’s a bad generalization with you pointing out Marvin and Cooks. Either way, I’d love a Ridley buy