Fields won't fall to 24th but I do think he will be the 4th/5th QB off the board. He's still 3 in my mind I don't think it's a stretch to say NFL looks for different attributes in QB prospects than 247's evaluatorsPullo Vision wrote: ↑Sat Apr 24, 2021 12:56 pmI took your comment to mean football fans are mis-valuing Fields vs Lawrence and that real football evaluators see a bigger gap but maybe I wasn't getting you.StripesOfKC wrote: ↑Wed Apr 21, 2021 11:21 pmI'm speaking specifically with regard to their NFL standing and in general saying that draft takes about a class until 8 months prior to the draft aren't really worth all that to me because the info you hear isn't generally from actual NFL peoplePullo Vision wrote: ↑Wed Apr 21, 2021 11:11 pm
Not trying to pile on here but Lawrence and Fields have been neck and neck as prospects for years.
https://www.sportingnews.com/us/ncaa-fo ... yva6lgjni3
https://lettermenrow.com/ohio-state-foo ... in-fields/
"He received a five-star rating and a composite score of 0.9998, which ranks tied for eighth all-time in the ranking’s history."
Not saying he's all that, or will amount to anything, but he has history of being well regarded, so dismissing him as a smoke cloud for fans seems wrong.
Like I like Sam Howell and Spencer Rattler but they aren't "locked in" as the top 2 QBs next year and we don't really have anything actually solid from NFL circles that they are the QB1/2 in 2022. If someone new comes and goes number 1 overall next year they won't be "surpassing" them in the NFL's view. They'd just be better
I guess I'm saying draft boards from a year ago shouldn't sway you that much
Not saying that Fields being higher in fans' minds than he may be in NFL FOs' means he will be bad either
There are examples of NFL teams overthinking a good player and them falling (Watson) and of NFL teams knowing more than fans who were quick to crown a guy based on his college performance (Haskins's falling to 18)
With regards to using "old" data to adjust your board, I guess you could see the beginning of their college career as the start and ask what have the two done over the years since to widen/narrow the gap. Seen quite a few suggestions that Lawrence hasn't done anything to distance himself, certainly not to warrant Lawrence as a number one overall and Fields as the 45/th QB and failing to 8th-24th.
Most pre draft rises and falls are only rises and falls based on media narratives--the exception being major off field problems emerging--Mac Jones being an early 1st isn't a "rise" from January when he was being mocked as a mid to late 1st--it's just the NFL actually starting to look at the tape and make their evaluations