The any TE, blocking is a big deal IMO.
The Kyle "Is not the" Pitts Thread
Re: Kyle Pitts
Not all that counts can be counted. Not all that can be counted counts.
Re: Kyle Pitts
Jimmy Graham was a legitimate liability as a blocker and it didn't matter. Pitts is a willing blocker, he just isn't asked to do it much or been coached much on it because he is just so good as a receiver. His presence on the field is enough to help in the running game because defenses have to prepare for him to be a receiving threat on every single play or he can make you pay. With professional coaching and weight training he will easily be able to become at least a passable blocker, and even if he doesn't he's not going to be lined up endline and be expected to hold up at the point of attack very often.Pac_Eddy wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 3:14 pmThe any TE, blocking is a big deal IMO.
Re: Kyle Pitts
I think Jimmy Graham would've been a better TE and on the field more if he was a better blocker.bjd5211 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 3:33 pmJimmy Graham was a legitimate liability as a blocker and it didn't matter. Pitts is a willing blocker, he just isn't asked to do it much or been coached much on it because he is just so good as a receiver. His presence on the field is enough to help in the running game because defenses have to prepare for him to be a receiving threat on every single play or he can make you pay. With professional coaching and weight training he will easily be able to become at least a passable blocker, and even if he doesn't he's not going to be lined up endline and be expected to hold up at the point of attack very often.
Not all that counts can be counted. Not all that can be counted counts.
Re: Kyle Pitts
Jimmy Graham never really had a problem with snap count. His snap counts when healthy were similar to Gronk, the best tight end ever.Pac_Eddy wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 3:37 pmI think Jimmy Graham would've been a better TE and on the field more if he was a better blocker.bjd5211 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 3:33 pmJimmy Graham was a legitimate liability as a blocker and it didn't matter. Pitts is a willing blocker, he just isn't asked to do it much or been coached much on it because he is just so good as a receiver. His presence on the field is enough to help in the running game because defenses have to prepare for him to be a receiving threat on every single play or he can make you pay. With professional coaching and weight training he will easily be able to become at least a passable blocker, and even if he doesn't he's not going to be lined up endline and be expected to hold up at the point of attack very often.
If Jimmy Graham was a better blocker he probably just would have put up worse stats.
12 Team .5 PPR - 1 QB, 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 1 WR/RB 20 man rosters, 5 man taxi est. 2018
QB: Dak, Pickett
RB: CMC, Taylor, Gibson, Dillon, Akers, Penny
WR: JJeff, Hollywood, Olave, Toney, Aiyuk, Jeudy, C. Davis, Boyd, C. Samuel,
TE: Njoku, Gesicki
2023 picks: 1.x, 2.x, 3.x, 4.x
QB: Dak, Pickett
RB: CMC, Taylor, Gibson, Dillon, Akers, Penny
WR: JJeff, Hollywood, Olave, Toney, Aiyuk, Jeudy, C. Davis, Boyd, C. Samuel,
TE: Njoku, Gesicki
2023 picks: 1.x, 2.x, 3.x, 4.x
Re: Kyle Pitts
If you're looking for a quantitative score for his blocking ability he had a 65.8 run blocking grade from PFF this year, which isn't great but it's above average. He doesn't need to be any more than average as a blocker in the NFL (I don't think he even needs to be that good) to be an elite player at his position.
Re: Kyle Pitts
Agreed. I don't think that being a better blocker hurts though. Same with RBs.
Not all that counts can be counted. Not all that can be counted counts.
Re: Kyle Pitts
I think it does when it comes to fantasy. Gronk and Kittle are elite receiving TEs who are looked at as also being excellent blockers for the position, so they end up blocking a lot and getting into more physical encounters than a TE who is more of a receiver only and it's probably not a coincidence that they have a bit of a history of getting banged up. If you have a TE who is a phenomenal receiver, but not much of a blocker, it makes more sense to use him in a way so that he doesn't have to take on those impacts as much when he's probably not going to make a huge difference anyway, and just let him do what he does best. Like I said before, his presence on the field alone will help the running game because as a Defense you have to prepare for him to be a receiver on every single play or he can hurt you.
-
- MVP
- Posts: 2732
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 5:33 pm
Re: Kyle Pitts
The idea that being useless as a blocker is somehow a good thing because it means the TE will be deployed more as a pass catcher only works if the team has no other options at TE, or if you're clearly one of your team's 3 best pass catchers. Being on the field matters.
I don't think any of this applies to Pitts. He's too good of a receiver, and he's not like some completely inept blocker.
I don't think any of this applies to Pitts. He's too good of a receiver, and he's not like some completely inept blocker.
COOGAN IS A CHEATER AND A THIEF
-
- Pro Bowler
- Posts: 1366
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2015 4:06 pm
Re: Kyle Pitts
He was rated 128/366 at run blocking in college per pff. Not sure what his actual run block grade was and how it transfers to the nfl. Seems low but I could be missing some context.OhCruelestRanter wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 6:17 pm The idea that being useless as a blocker is somehow a good thing because it means the TE will be deployed more as a pass catcher only works if the team has no other options at TE, or if you're clearly one of your team's 3 best pass catchers. Being on the field matters.
I don't think any of this applies to Pitts. He's too good of a receiver, and he's not like some completely inept blocker.
48 team, 4 copy league, QB, RB, WR, WR, TE, SF, 4 flex
QB - Wentz, Tannehill, Mayfield, Jones, Alex Smith
RB - Chubb, Hunt, Swift, Akers, Henderson, Mostert, Mack, Bowden, Hill
WR - AJ Brown, DJ Moore, Gabriel Davis, Slayton, Hamler, Isabella
TE - Fant, Burton, Firkser, Keene, Okuegbunam
2021 Draft - 1.09, 3rd
QB - Wentz, Tannehill, Mayfield, Jones, Alex Smith
RB - Chubb, Hunt, Swift, Akers, Henderson, Mostert, Mack, Bowden, Hill
WR - AJ Brown, DJ Moore, Gabriel Davis, Slayton, Hamler, Isabella
TE - Fant, Burton, Firkser, Keene, Okuegbunam
2021 Draft - 1.09, 3rd
Re: Kyle Pitts
If he blocks it helps because then defenses can’t just play him as a wide receiver. He’s more likely to get favorable matchup‘s if he is a threat to black. Then teams can’t go to nickel or dime packages and use secondary people to cover him.
- wickerkat1212
- Legend
- Posts: 5599
- Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2019 9:23 am
- Contact:
Re: Kyle Pitts
You can improve your blocking skills. That can be taught.
D3:
QB—Allen, Pickett RB—Kamara, Jacobs, ZWhite, Edwards, Ford, Warren WR—Lamb, Olave, DJM, Puka, Tillman, Marshall, Jefferson, Robinson, Tucker TE—Ferguson, Schoon, Likely, Smith, Washington, Kraft PK—Prater DEF—BAL
D4:
QB—TLaw, JimmyG, Tannehill, AOC, Hall RB—Bijan, Kamara, Conner, Gainwell, Gainwell, Foreman, ZMoss, Chandler, McLaughlin, Murray WR—Jefferson, Hill, Adams, Allen, Tillman, Woods TE—Kelce, Kmet, Conklin PK—Butker DEF—PIT
Superflex 1:
QB—Mahomes, Rodgers, Mayfield RB—Bijan, Kamara, Allgeier, Singletary, Mostert, BRob, Warren, Rodriguez, Spiller WR—Chase, DJM, Devonta, MBrown, Myers, Reynold, Jones TE—Kmet, Likely, Kraft, Conklin, Hurst, Hudson PK—Elliott DEF—PHI
Superflex 2:
QB: Goff, Cousins, Wentz, White; RB: Bijan, BRob, ZWhite, Allgeier, McLaughlin WR: DJM, Higgins, JSN, Downs, RMoore, Atwell, SMoore, PCampbell, DPJ, ATP, Hutchinson, Iosivas, Devante, CJones TE: Ferguson, Kraft, Trautman, Tremble
QB—Allen, Pickett RB—Kamara, Jacobs, ZWhite, Edwards, Ford, Warren WR—Lamb, Olave, DJM, Puka, Tillman, Marshall, Jefferson, Robinson, Tucker TE—Ferguson, Schoon, Likely, Smith, Washington, Kraft PK—Prater DEF—BAL
D4:
QB—TLaw, JimmyG, Tannehill, AOC, Hall RB—Bijan, Kamara, Conner, Gainwell, Gainwell, Foreman, ZMoss, Chandler, McLaughlin, Murray WR—Jefferson, Hill, Adams, Allen, Tillman, Woods TE—Kelce, Kmet, Conklin PK—Butker DEF—PIT
Superflex 1:
QB—Mahomes, Rodgers, Mayfield RB—Bijan, Kamara, Allgeier, Singletary, Mostert, BRob, Warren, Rodriguez, Spiller WR—Chase, DJM, Devonta, MBrown, Myers, Reynold, Jones TE—Kmet, Likely, Kraft, Conklin, Hurst, Hudson PK—Elliott DEF—PHI
Superflex 2:
QB: Goff, Cousins, Wentz, White; RB: Bijan, BRob, ZWhite, Allgeier, McLaughlin WR: DJM, Higgins, JSN, Downs, RMoore, Atwell, SMoore, PCampbell, DPJ, ATP, Hutchinson, Iosivas, Devante, CJones TE: Ferguson, Kraft, Trautman, Tremble
Re: Kyle Pitts
If a tight end isn’t already clearly one of their team’s three best pass catchers, then they aren’t going to be fantasy relevant anyways, regardless of whether they can or cannot block. Being on the field only matters if the TE is running routes and catching passes. If a TE is seeing additional playing time that he would not otherwise receive with lesser blocking skills, the marginal increase in snaps will lead only to more blocking.OhCruelestRanter wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 6:17 pm The idea that being useless as a blocker is somehow a good thing because it means the TE will be deployed more as a pass catcher only works if the team has no other options at TE, or if you're clearly one of your team's 3 best pass catchers. Being on the field matters.
I don't think any of this applies to Pitts. He's too good of a receiver, and he's not like some completely inept blocker.
If Jimmy Graham is already playing a reasonably maximum number of snaps, and his receiving to blocking ratio is 100:0, better blocking will lead to more blocking which will lead to less receiving. There is simply no alternative.
12 Team .5 PPR - 1 QB, 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 1 WR/RB 20 man rosters, 5 man taxi est. 2018
QB: Dak, Pickett
RB: CMC, Taylor, Gibson, Dillon, Akers, Penny
WR: JJeff, Hollywood, Olave, Toney, Aiyuk, Jeudy, C. Davis, Boyd, C. Samuel,
TE: Njoku, Gesicki
2023 picks: 1.x, 2.x, 3.x, 4.x
QB: Dak, Pickett
RB: CMC, Taylor, Gibson, Dillon, Akers, Penny
WR: JJeff, Hollywood, Olave, Toney, Aiyuk, Jeudy, C. Davis, Boyd, C. Samuel,
TE: Njoku, Gesicki
2023 picks: 1.x, 2.x, 3.x, 4.x
Re: Kyle Pitts
-
- GOAT
- Posts: 14254
- Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2014 6:06 pm
Re: Kyle Pitts
Having trouble thinking of any recently-lauded TEs who came in with questionable or worse blocking skills and became good blockers in the NFL. It's definitely not a long list if there are examples.wickerkat1212 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 7:55 pm You can improve your blocking skills. That can be taught.
I would argue that blocking is actually very difficult to teach. It's not just the action of blocking someone at the LOS and learning different techniques; you're basically functioning as another offensive lineman with assignments, blitz pickup, and different things like that. Also, it's the mentality of a player accepting that he's not always going to be catching passes and there will be some games where he's used more for his blocking.
You can't really disregard it. Someone mentioned Jimmy Graham, and he would've been a much more valuable player if he wasn't a piss poor blocker throughout his career. If we're being honest, Graham has been a mediocre to average at best TE since leaving New Orleans and not all of that is because of the patellar tendon injury.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Google [Bot] and 46 guests