Page 31 of 31

Re: Week 2 Discussion

Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2020 8:04 pm
by Ray Finkle
Redemption

Re: Week 2 Discussion

Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2020 8:09 pm
by The MAC Machine
I just need 2 catches from Witten. Is that too much to ask? 😂 Not even any yardage...just 2 catches for 0 yards.

Re: Week 2 Discussion

Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2020 8:16 pm
by Cameron Giles
Brees without Michael Thomas is cooked.

Re: Week 2 Discussion

Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2020 8:39 pm
by BlackOmega
Cameron Giles wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 8:16 pm Brees without Michael Thomas is cooked.
I would have to concur with this, Brees certainly doesn't look like his former self.

Re: Week 2 Discussion

Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2020 8:43 pm
by Bot101
BlackOmega wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 8:39 pm
Cameron Giles wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 8:16 pm Brees without Michael Thomas is cooked.
I would have to concur with this, Brees certainly doesn't look like his former self.
What MT has done for Brees is the same thing OBJ did for Manning. Hiding just how cooked they are.

Re: Week 2 Discussion

Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2020 8:57 pm
by Cameron Giles
Bot101 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 8:43 pm
BlackOmega wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 8:39 pm
Cameron Giles wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 8:16 pm Brees without Michael Thomas is cooked.
I would have to concur with this, Brees certainly doesn't look like his former self.
What MT has done for Brees is the same thing OBJ did for Manning. Hiding just how cooked they are.
Bingo. Which is why I never understood why people are afraid of his production dropping when Brees retires.

Re: Week 2 Discussion

Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2020 9:36 pm
by FantasyFreak
The positive to draw from this is, it happened so early he should be 100 percent by week 1 next year.

Re: Week 2 Discussion

Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2020 10:35 pm
by Pullo Vision
Jigga94 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 7:37 pm This LV o line is awful. Just running right past the DL
If I recall correctly, they were down 2 starters. The play by play people were talking about the oline is specifically trained across all positions and how a back up guard was starting at RT.

Re: Week 2 Discussion

Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2020 11:07 pm
by WOATjohn
StripesOfKC wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 4:59 pm I can't believe I am saying this about a rival team quarterbacked by Derek Carr, but gut feeling says the Raiders pull the upset tonight

If it happens I'll have to reconsider my opinion of Carr
Nice call

Re: Week 2 Discussion

Posted: Tue Sep 22, 2020 4:31 am
by Jigga94
Pullo Vision wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 10:35 pm
Jigga94 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 7:37 pm This LV o line is awful. Just running right past the DL
If I recall correctly, they were down 2 starters. The play by play people were talking about the oline is specifically trained across all positions and how a back up guard was starting at RT.
Nice I was watching but wasn't listening lol thanks for the info

Re: Week 2 Discussion

Posted: Tue Sep 22, 2020 4:47 am
by MFundercover
Assessing the damage, I got hammered with injuries week 2. I'm 2-0 and still have the inside track to the playoffs, but I would feel a lot better if Saquon and Sutton would return at some point.

Re: Week 2 Discussion

Posted: Tue Sep 22, 2020 5:43 am
by jcc6fd
MFundercover wrote: ↑Tue Sep 22, 2020 4:47 am Assessing the damage, I got hammered with injuries week 2. I'm 2-0 and still have the inside track to the playoffs, but I would feel a lot better if Saquon and Sutton would return at some point.
Neither of them are coming back this year unfortunately

Re: Week 2 Discussion

Posted: Tue Sep 22, 2020 5:44 am
by MFundercover
jcc6fd wrote: ↑Tue Sep 22, 2020 5:43 am
MFundercover wrote: ↑Tue Sep 22, 2020 4:47 am Assessing the damage, I got hammered with injuries week 2. I'm 2-0 and still have the inside track to the playoffs, but I would feel a lot better if Saquon and Sutton would return at some point.
Neither of them are coming back this year unfortunately
Thanks for breaking this news. I hadn't heard.

Re: Week 2 Discussion

Posted: Tue Sep 22, 2020 10:53 am
by Servo
FantasyFreak wrote: ↑Sun Sep 20, 2020 5:07 pm One thing I'd like to mention about those calling for the heads of Wentz, (Watson is looking "meh"), Carr, Dak etc. There are a few elite players at the position, and teams struggle for years to find a guy that doesn't look like Bortles etc. They aren't going to throw guys to the wayside, because they know the guy behind them, almost certainly, is far worse. It's a really tough position to play, especially when your OL is decimated, or WR's. If Carr or Wentz, for example, were cut by there teams, they would find a job instantly. Fans, and FF players sometimes don't understand how hard it is to find somebody that's even competent at that position.
Lol, you're out here this week truly willing to die on this Wentz hill.

Yes, I think a lot of us can agree that the issue isn't just Wentz: injuries, WR corps, coaching, still, let's not forget that it's Wentz that will be squarely in the spotlight and shouldering most of the blame. What's one difference between Carr, Dak, etc? Their teams haven't drafted someone highly enough that could force fans/media/etc to start clamoring for change (yet).

Because that will continue to happen if they keep losing, whether you like Hurts or not.

Re: Week 2 Discussion

Posted: Tue Sep 22, 2020 11:04 am
by bjd5211
Dallas and LV haven't recently invested a massive contract into their QB either though, and Philly can't get out of that contract without a massive dead money hit (Eagles are in a very tough cap situation) for another 2 years. The Eagles and their fans are stuck with Wentz for better or worse for awhile. Only way Hurts takes over the job anytime soon is if Wentz gets hurt, and then Hurts plays so well/wins so much they can't take him out of the lineup.