Kelley/McFarland overvalued?

General talk about Dynasty Leagues.
jjleurquin
Captain
Captain
Posts: 962
Joined: Tue May 19, 2020 4:10 pm

Kelley/McFarland overvalued?

Postby jjleurquin » Sat Aug 22, 2020 8:51 pm

I keep seeing people talk about these 2 like they are the backups. Nothing that we've heard or seen really suggests that to be the case.

LA has Jackson as the RB2, and though I do think Kelley could be good given opportunity he's a ways from that opportunity at this point as he's playing behind 2 talented backs.

I have an even bigger problem with McFarland though. Early in the offseason he was being drafted in front of guys like Dillon and Moss and while his hype has died down a bit I still think his price is way higher than it should be. Conner and Snell are solidified in front of him. Amzaing blocking and a good system made him look better in college than he actually is, and he still wasn't even the best RB on his team in college so unless you think Javon Leake is just massively undervalued and a stud as well then you probably shouldn't like mcfarland.

OhCruelestRanter
MVP
MVP
Posts: 2732
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 5:33 pm

Re: Kelley/McFarland overvalued?

Postby OhCruelestRanter » Sat Aug 22, 2020 8:57 pm

I have one copy of each. The McFarland hype is easier to understand- he’s the only RB in Pittsburgh with any real long speed. I agree, he’s clearly far down the pecking order, but I think the idea is that he has a talent that the other RBs lack, so if/when he gets a shot, he could run away with the job. He fell to me at 3.06 in the league where I have Conner, but this was earlier in the season when the hype hadn’t really hit.

As for Kelley, his hype did seem to predicated on a role that he just doesn’t have right now, and might not be that valuable anyway.

Agree that taking either of these guys over Dillon is a low probability move.
COOGAN IS A CHEATER AND A THIEF

Online
Jigga94
GOAT
GOAT
Posts: 16097
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:38 pm

Re: Kelley/McFarland overvalued?

Postby Jigga94 » Sat Aug 22, 2020 9:53 pm

It happens with most rookie RB. RB are worth a lot in most leagues. People get desperate for any RB with a shot and it pushes them all up the board. I mean CEH is practically a top 5 startup pick already. I agree that neither of these guys will probably amount to much and I like the prospects of Dillon more than any RB not named CEH, JT, JK, Swift or Akers. Those 6 are honestly the only ones worth drafting for me at their ADPs and I still think Akers is probably going too high.

straightcashhomie831
Practice Squad
Practice Squad
Posts: 169
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2020 1:28 pm

Re: Kelley/McFarland overvalued?

Postby straightcashhomie831 » Sat Aug 22, 2020 10:11 pm

I think so..i faded both guys. Kelly went 2.09 in my league and Mcfarland went 3.07. I think everyone scrambled to pick a rb after all the top rbs were gone. I'd rather have Deejay Dallas or even Eno.

Online
Jigga94
GOAT
GOAT
Posts: 16097
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:38 pm

Re: Kelley/McFarland overvalued?

Postby Jigga94 » Sun Aug 23, 2020 5:49 am

straightcashhomie831 wrote: Sat Aug 22, 2020 10:11 pm I think so..i faded both guys. Kelly went 2.09 in my league and Mcfarland went 3.07. I think everyone scrambled to pick a rb after all the top rbs were gone. I'd rather have Deejay Dallas or even Eno.
Actually McFarland mid 3rd doesn't seem too bad, figured he was going mid or late 2nd. He went 2.04 in a draft of mine. Kelley went 3.10 which seemed about right

User avatar
sugbear65
Ring of Fame
Ring of Fame
Posts: 3848
Joined: Thu May 17, 2012 5:12 pm

Re: Kelley/McFarland overvalued?

Postby sugbear65 » Sun Aug 23, 2020 5:59 am

I was going to say I think these guys are 3rd or 4th round prospects, though I haven’t looked at any of the ADP. I do know in my drafts, back in May, these guys were still going behind the likes of Dillon and Moss. Maybe that’s just localized to my leagues. But I don’t feel like these guys are overhyped really.

jenkins.math
All Pro
All Pro
Posts: 1590
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2018 10:56 am

Re: Kelley/McFarland overvalued?

Postby jenkins.math » Sun Aug 23, 2020 6:10 am

Mizelle has McFarland with an ADP of rookie pick 23, followed in order by Claypool, Evans, Kelley, Bowden, Van Jefferson, and Hamler. Nothing too outrageous there.

User avatar
Orenthal Shames
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6656
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:13 pm

Re: Kelley/McFarland overvalued?

Postby Orenthal Shames » Sun Aug 23, 2020 6:36 am

jenkins.math wrote: Sun Aug 23, 2020 6:10 am Mizelle has McFarland with an ADP of rookie pick 23, followed in order by Claypool, Evans, Kelley, Bowden, Van Jefferson, and Hamler. Nothing too outrageous there.
🎯
16 team league
1 QB, 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 2 Flex (RB/WR/TE)
26 upman rosters - full point ppr
2015, 17, 18, 19, 20 Champs

QB: Watson, Flacco Stidham
RB: Bijan, Gibbs, McLaughlin
WR: Olave, Addison, Flowers, Rice, Sutton, Downs, Mims, Tillman
TE: Kittle, Goedert, Chig, Woods
24 Picks: 1.06

jjleurquin
Captain
Captain
Posts: 962
Joined: Tue May 19, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: Kelley/McFarland overvalued?

Postby jjleurquin » Sun Aug 23, 2020 6:54 am

jenkins.math wrote: Sun Aug 23, 2020 6:10 am Mizelle has McFarland with an ADP of rookie pick 23, followed in order by Claypool, Evans, Kelley, Bowden, Van Jefferson, and Hamler. Nothing too outrageous there.
I wouldn't take mcfarland over claypool can hamler or duvernay. He's also at best the 3rd RB on his team to start the season. Evans is the 2nd. I'll take Evans over him too.

Also where does mizelle get ther ADP from? But either way I'm not using a late 2nd/early 3rd on mcfarland.

straightcashhomie831
Practice Squad
Practice Squad
Posts: 169
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2020 1:28 pm

Re: Kelley/McFarland overvalued?

Postby straightcashhomie831 » Sun Aug 23, 2020 7:28 am

Jigga94 wrote: Sun Aug 23, 2020 5:49 am
straightcashhomie831 wrote: Sat Aug 22, 2020 10:11 pm I think so..i faded both guys. Kelly went 2.09 in my league and Mcfarland went 3.07. I think everyone scrambled to pick a rb after all the top rbs were gone. I'd rather have Deejay Dallas or even Eno.
Actually McFarland mid 3rd doesn't seem too bad, figured he was going mid or late 2nd. He went 2.04 in a draft of mine. Kelley went 3.10 which seemed about right
true. I actually like Mcfarland better than Kelly. I wanted Mcfarland but Aiyuk fell to me at 2.09. With Moss, Dillon and Gibson gone i think Mcfarland deserves a look if you need a rb.

I think this guy in my league just liked Kelley...alot.

QB Browns
Role Player
Role Player
Posts: 318
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2018 3:50 pm

Re: Kelley/McFarland overvalued?

Postby QB Browns » Sun Aug 23, 2020 9:06 am

Yeah both went late 3rd in my league, so at that point it's hard to say they're overvalued. Once you're there in the draft it's just taking who you like.
Team 1

10 team, 2 QB, 3 RB, 3 WR, 1 TE, 1WR/TE, 1 RB/WR/TE, DEF, .5 ppr

QB: D. Prescott, K. Cousins, A. Richardson, R. Tannehill, T. Lance

RB: A. Kamara, S. Barkley, Bi. Robinson, J. Conner, J. Dobbins, A. Dillon, D. Harris, R. Stephenson, K. Herbert, I. Spiller, Br. Robinson, K. Ingram, T. Spears, D. Foreman

WR: M. Evans, D. Adams, AJ Brown, C. Lamb, J. Waddle, K. Toney, J. Reed

TE: D. Waller, P. Friermuth, D. Kincaid

User avatar
jcc6fd
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame
Posts: 4973
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 9:26 am

Re: Kelley/McFarland overvalued?

Postby jcc6fd » Sun Aug 23, 2020 11:00 am

FWIW playerprofiler has James Conner as the RB most likely to sustain an injury in 2020 based on their predictive analytics (more than Guice was prior to him being cut). Also Snell is not serious competition for the backup job.

McFarland is going in the very late 2nd, early third in rookie drafts. For a guy who, at least statistically, has a high likelihood to get decent touches at somepoint his rookie year, who runs a 4.44, taken in the 4th round, with an injury prone back on his last year of his contract in front of him, his ADP actually seems like a bargain to me. The glut of round 1/2 WRs is driving his ADP down this year, but you have to remember that guys like Kenneth Dixon (Supplemental 4th round picks), can typically go at the back end of the first in a typical rookie draft. For the price of your late 2nd or early third you can get someone with a realistic shot to play at RB. Not too bad.
10 Team Half PPR Scoring SF
QB: Mahomes, Hurts, Minshew
RB: Kamara, K. Hunt, Warren, Bigsby, D. Cook, Jamaal Williams, J. Wilson, McLaughlin, McKinnon, J. Kelley
WR: A.J. Brown, Diggs, K. Allen, C. Watson, Cooks, Pickens, W. Robinson
TE: Kelce, J. Smith, Musgrave

Online
Jigga94
GOAT
GOAT
Posts: 16097
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2017 8:38 pm

Re: Kelley/McFarland overvalued?

Postby Jigga94 » Sun Aug 23, 2020 11:46 am

jcc6fd wrote: Sun Aug 23, 2020 11:00 am FWIW playerprofiler has James Conner as the RB most likely to sustain an injury in 2020 based on their predictive analytics (more than Guice was prior to him being cut). Also Snell is not serious competition for the backup job.

McFarland is going in the very late 2nd, early third in rookie drafts. For a guy who, at least statistically, has a high likelihood to get decent touches at somepoint his rookie year, who runs a 4.44, taken in the 4th round, with an injury prone back on his last year of his contract in front of him, his ADP actually seems like a bargain to me. The glut of round 1/2 WRs is driving his ADP down this year, but you have to remember that guys like Kenneth Dixon (Supplemental 4th round picks), can typically go at the back end of the first in a typical rookie draft. For the price of your late 2nd or early third you can get someone with a realistic shot to play at RB. Not too bad.
What about Jaylen Samuels? Is he a non factor now?

User avatar
mgscott
Starter
Starter
Posts: 526
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 11:21 am

Re: Kelley/McFarland overvalued?

Postby mgscott » Sun Aug 23, 2020 11:59 am

Jigga94 wrote: Sun Aug 23, 2020 11:46 am
jcc6fd wrote: Sun Aug 23, 2020 11:00 am FWIW playerprofiler has James Conner as the RB most likely to sustain an injury in 2020 based on their predictive analytics (more than Guice was prior to him being cut). Also Snell is not serious competition for the backup job.

McFarland is going in the very late 2nd, early third in rookie drafts. For a guy who, at least statistically, has a high likelihood to get decent touches at somepoint his rookie year, who runs a 4.44, taken in the 4th round, with an injury prone back on his last year of his contract in front of him, his ADP actually seems like a bargain to me. The glut of round 1/2 WRs is driving his ADP down this year, but you have to remember that guys like Kenneth Dixon (Supplemental 4th round picks), can typically go at the back end of the first in a typical rookie draft. For the price of your late 2nd or early third you can get someone with a realistic shot to play at RB. Not too bad.
What about Jaylen Samuels? Is he a non factor now?
Unfortunately, it seems he is. He was barely used in a lot of the games Conner was out. Tomlin couldn't get enough of the plodding Snell. There's even talk of Samuels not making the team.

FantasyFreak
GOAT
GOAT
Posts: 27189
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2014 1:03 am

Re: Kelley/McFarland overvalued?

Postby FantasyFreak » Sun Aug 23, 2020 12:00 pm

mgscott wrote: Sun Aug 23, 2020 11:59 am
Jigga94 wrote: Sun Aug 23, 2020 11:46 am
jcc6fd wrote: Sun Aug 23, 2020 11:00 am FWIW playerprofiler has James Conner as the RB most likely to sustain an injury in 2020 based on their predictive analytics (more than Guice was prior to him being cut). Also Snell is not serious competition for the backup job.

McFarland is going in the very late 2nd, early third in rookie drafts. For a guy who, at least statistically, has a high likelihood to get decent touches at somepoint his rookie year, who runs a 4.44, taken in the 4th round, with an injury prone back on his last year of his contract in front of him, his ADP actually seems like a bargain to me. The glut of round 1/2 WRs is driving his ADP down this year, but you have to remember that guys like Kenneth Dixon (Supplemental 4th round picks), can typically go at the back end of the first in a typical rookie draft. For the price of your late 2nd or early third you can get someone with a realistic shot to play at RB. Not too bad.
What about Jaylen Samuels? Is he a non factor now?
Unfortunately, it seems he is. He was barely used in a lot of the games Conner was out. Tomlin couldn't get enough of the plodding Snell. There's even talk of Samuels not making the team.
Snell lost 12 pounds and apparently has really reshaped him body. He'll never be "fast", but all indications are, he's much quicker this year.
"You're a creep. You got caught.." -Dan Patrick


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Injury Prone, Jigga94, moishetreats and 32 guests