DK - what receivers out of this draft would you take over him?

[Wizard]

So now that we know where they all went, would you take any of the rookie receivers of DK? Or take DK? I'm at 1.08 so I don't expect any RBs to be left and if I'm going to get a WR maybe it would be better to trade for a more established WR (DK).

[Sriracha]

So now that we know where they all went, would you take any of the rookie receivers of DK? Or take DK? I'm at 1.08 so I don't expect any RBs to be left and if I'm going to get a WR maybe it would be better to trade for a more established WR (DK).

Akers/Dobbins has fallen there in a couple of drafts. I traded my 1.10 away thinking the RBs would be off the board, and instantly regretted it when Dobbins went af the 10 spot.

Wait till your pick before moving imo.

Im taking DK tethered to Russel Wilson over any of these WRs

[Ice]

Lots of good WR's in this class but I would want a 1st next year along with my pick of WR's in this class due to DK's upside. He was a man among boys a lot as a rookie and will only get better.

[TimeWillTell]

Since this was brought up, where do we value DK in this draft. I was approaches by someone wanting my 1.04 (they are as RB needy as I am). He threw out DK as one of the players he was willing to move in a deal.

Edit: where do we hold him overall including vs the RB group

[Sriracha]

Since this was brought up, where do we value DK in this draft. I was approaches by someone wanting my 1.04 (they are as RB needy as I am). He threw out DK as one of the players he was willing to move in a deal.

Edit: where do we hold him overall including vs the RB group

1.04 is guaranteed CEH/Taylor/Dobbins/Swift/Akers... I'd have a very hard time turning that down

[TimeWillTell]

Since this was brought up, where do we value DK in this draft. I was approaches by someone wanting my 1.04 (they are as RB needy as I am). He threw out DK as one of the players he was willing to move in a deal.

Edit: where do we hold him overall including vs the RB group

1.04 is guaranteed CEH/Taylor/Dobbins/Swift/Akers... I'd have a very hard time turning that down

Right, but I'm talking from my side. I own 1.04. (Actually own 1,2,3 and 4, 8,10,12). Trying to decide if it makes sense to trade 1.04 for a WR like DK that's more established vs taking the 4th RB. If I keep all 4 picks I'll draft 4 RB.

[Kmani6]

I like that trade, but not for your roster. DK should be valued at the 1.04 or higher probably because he is paired to Wilson, and showed a ton of potential his rookie year. If you are talking about the team in your sig, you badly need the RB help though.

[TimeWillTell]

I like that trade, but not for your roster. DK should be valued at the 1.04 or higher probably because he is paired to Wilson, and showed a ton of potential his rookie year. If you are talking about the team in your sig, you badly need the RB help though.

Yes team in sig. Think I agree. Just seems tempting which is why I figured I'd ask others! Def need RB help and plenty of other picks to load up on WR

[Kmani6]

Since this was brought up, where do we value DK in this draft. I was approaches by someone wanting my 1.04 (they are as RB needy as I am). He threw out DK as one of the players he was willing to move in a deal.

Edit: where do we hold him overall including vs the RB group

1.04 is guaranteed CEH/Taylor/Dobbins/Swift/Akers... I'd have a very hard time turning that down

Right, but I'm talking from my side. I own 1.04. (Actually own 1,2,3 and 4, 8,10,12). Trying to decide if it makes sense to trade 1.04 for a WR like DK that's more established vs taking the 4th RB. If I keep all 4 picks I'll draft 4 RB.

Looks like we posted at the same time. I'd move your 1.04 for DK. You can grab your favorite three RBs with 1-3, and those guys plus Saquon is enough to rebuild your entire RB core. I'd be surprised if all 4 of the RB's panned out, and DK showed a ton in year 1. I thought that you just had the 1.04 in which case it was an easy hold for me, but now I would definitely move the pick.

[TimeWillTell]

1.04 is guaranteed CEH/Taylor/Dobbins/Swift/Akers... I'd have a very hard time turning that down

Right, but I'm talking from my side. I own 1.04. (Actually own 1,2,3 and 4, 8,10,12). Trying to decide if it makes sense to trade 1.04 for a WR like DK that's more established vs taking the 4th RB. If I keep all 4 picks I'll draft 4 RB.

Looks like we posted at the same time. I'd move your 1.04 for DK. You can grab your favorite three RBs with 1-3, and those guys plus Saquon is enough to rebuild your entire RB core. I'd be surprised if all 4 of the RB's panned out, and DK showed a ton in year 1. I thought that you just had the 1.04 in which case it was an easy hold for me, but now I would definitely move the pick.

Thanks for the advice. I'll try to nail down more details on what he's thinking and see if I can't snag DK from him.

[spotxc]

If I had your roster and picks, Id try to grab DK+ a little something on top if u can for the 1.04..youre still grabbing the top 3 rbs you want and you could use another potential great wr

[Sriracha]

Since this was brought up, where do we value DK in this draft. I was approaches by someone wanting my 1.04 (they are as RB needy as I am). He threw out DK as one of the players he was willing to move in a deal.

Edit: where do we hold him overall including vs the RB group

1.04 is guaranteed CEH/Taylor/Dobbins/Swift/Akers... I'd have a very hard time turning that down

Right, but I'm talking from my side. I own 1.04. (Actually own 1,2,3 and 4, 8,10,12). Trying to decide if it makes sense to trade 1.04 for a WR like DK that's more established vs taking the 4th RB. If I keep all 4 picks I'll draft 4 RB.

Nothing wrong with taking 4 RBs.. and your WR's are stacked.

[Kmani6]

1.04 is guaranteed CEH/Taylor/Dobbins/Swift/Akers... I'd have a very hard time turning that down

Right, but I'm talking from my side. I own 1.04. (Actually own 1,2,3 and 4, 8,10,12). Trying to decide if it makes sense to trade 1.04 for a WR like DK that's more established vs taking the 4th RB. If I keep all 4 picks I'll draft 4 RB.

Nothing wrong with taking 4 RBs.. and your WR's are stacked.

He doesn't need 5 RBs lol. WRs hold value longer and DK has showed a scary ceiling. In the playoffs that 160 yard game was insane. He's paired with Wilson too, which is hype. He starts 3 WR and 2 RB, so there is nothing wrong with stacking WR's.

[Lssd2012]

Interesting I would definetely take all the top 5 RBs over DK personally, it's just such an important position and you can never have too many rbs IMO.

I'd also take Lamb over DK too. To me, they are about even so just comes down to preference.

[Sriracha]

He doesn't need 5 RBs lol. WRs hold value longer and DK has showed a scary ceiling. In the playoffs that 160 yard game was insane. He's paired with Wilson too, which is hype. He starts 3 WR and 2 RB, so there is nothing wrong with stacking WR's.

He already has Evans, AJB, DJM, DJ Chark... Does he need 5 WRs?

RB's get injured a ton, and some of these RBs might break out faster than others.