Jonathan Taylor is your 1.01 now.

General talk about Dynasty Leagues.
User avatar
Krypto_King
Pro Bowler
Pro Bowler
Posts: 1359
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 2:29 pm

Re: Jonathan Taylor is your 1.01 now.

Postby Krypto_King » Sun Jan 10, 2021 10:24 pm

AussieMate wrote: Sun Jan 10, 2021 9:21 pm
Krypto_King wrote: Sun Jan 10, 2021 8:39 pm ok, but you don't have hesitation about 26y/o Kamara without Brees, Barkley coming off 2 semi-lost years and stagnating offense, Henry's age difference and usage, Cook's injury history? Taylor is likely the most insulated though not as high a ceiling
What about Kamara has you concerned so far? his low usage but high output?
He is projected to lose his HOF QB and in 4 games with the projected replacement he paced for 64 targets and 204 receiving yards. Combine that he just hit his career high in rushing yards at 932 and again, is entering age 26 season. If I was giving advice I'd probably say take him over JT but not sure I'd actually do it in practice. Maybe I'm being too cautious though

AussieMate
Player of the Year
Player of the Year
Posts: 2091
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 3:58 pm

Re: Jonathan Taylor is your 1.01 now.

Postby AussieMate » Sun Jan 10, 2021 11:05 pm

Krypto_King wrote: Sun Jan 10, 2021 10:24 pm
AussieMate wrote: Sun Jan 10, 2021 9:21 pm
Krypto_King wrote: Sun Jan 10, 2021 8:39 pm ok, but you don't have hesitation about 26y/o Kamara without Brees, Barkley coming off 2 semi-lost years and stagnating offense, Henry's age difference and usage, Cook's injury history? Taylor is likely the most insulated though not as high a ceiling
What about Kamara has you concerned so far? his low usage but high output?
He is projected to lose his HOF QB and in 4 games with the projected replacement he paced for 64 targets and 204 receiving yards. Combine that he just hit his career high in rushing yards at 932 and again, is entering age 26 season. If I was giving advice I'd probably say take him over JT but not sure I'd actually do it in practice. Maybe I'm being too cautious though
Yeah I get the QB worry, I have faith that with a proper offseason with whoever the new QB is will bring about better results then the 4 games sample size. Taysom being that guy would make me hesitate slightly but I'm not that concerned, Kamara just gets it done.

Sriracha
Ring of Fame
Ring of Fame
Posts: 3698
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2019 2:38 pm

Re: Jonathan Taylor is your 1.01 now.

Postby Sriracha » Mon Jan 11, 2021 12:48 am

AussieMate wrote: Sun Jan 10, 2021 11:05 pm
Krypto_King wrote: Sun Jan 10, 2021 10:24 pm
AussieMate wrote: Sun Jan 10, 2021 9:21 pm

What about Kamara has you concerned so far? his low usage but high output?
He is projected to lose his HOF QB and in 4 games with the projected replacement he paced for 64 targets and 204 receiving yards. Combine that he just hit his career high in rushing yards at 932 and again, is entering age 26 season. If I was giving advice I'd probably say take him over JT but not sure I'd actually do it in practice. Maybe I'm being too cautious though
Yeah I get the QB worry, I have faith that with a proper offseason with whoever the new QB is will bring about better results then the 4 games sample size. Taysom being that guy would make me hesitate slightly but I'm not that concerned, Kamara just gets it done.
Drew Brees is one of the best screen game QBs of all time... if he's retiring I'd be very concerned with Kamara's target share moving forward.

User avatar
mgscott
Starter
Starter
Posts: 528
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 11:21 am

Re: Jonathan Taylor is your 1.01 now.

Postby mgscott » Mon Jan 11, 2021 8:06 am

Yarnith wrote: Sun Jan 10, 2021 10:21 pm
mgscott wrote: Sun Jan 10, 2021 1:59 pm Are you saying the odds are against you for any RB, because they all eventually drop off, or are you saying you're playing the odds against RB's that have higher carries? I haven't ever seen real data or stats that truly show RB's struggle due to high carries more than the average RB after an average year.
I am saying I know the odds are longer for high usage backs having long careers. If you haven't ever seen stats that truly show all these things you have never looked for it. Believe whatever ya want I will stay with my conservative estimates.
I've never seen anything to support that, but go with whatever you want chief. I guess I don't research enough.

Ice
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6621
Joined: Tue May 22, 2018 6:17 pm

Re: Jonathan Taylor is your 1.01 now.

Postby Ice » Mon Jan 11, 2021 8:49 am

After yet another horrible receiving game when rushing 18 plus times; 4 targets 2 catches 6 yards, thinking he is a top 3 Dynasty pick is an extremely risky position in ppr leagues.

He looks like a legit high carry back with low receiving potential.

Top 3....REALLY ?
The Clock is Running and there are no Timeouts

CGW
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6606
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2018 2:31 pm

Re: Jonathan Taylor is your 1.01 now.

Postby CGW » Mon Jan 11, 2021 9:16 am

Ice wrote: Mon Jan 11, 2021 8:49 am After yet another horrible receiving game when rushing 18 plus times; 4 targets 2 catches 6 yards, thinking he is a top 3 Dynasty pick is an extremely risky position in ppr leagues.

He looks like a legit high carry back with low receiving potential.

Top 3....REALLY ?
Top 3 might be a bit high...but how many below him aren't risky or offer his upside? Ranking players is a losing proposition just like mock drafts. Production never matches rankings. I tend to put players into tiers, and JT fits into the tier just after CMC and Kamara. 3rd, 5th, 10th...who cares?

Sorry CEH dropped as far as he did, but doesn't mean it's crazy to like JT.

cantguardjake
Role Player
Role Player
Posts: 369
Joined: Tue May 15, 2018 4:53 am

Re: Jonathan Taylor is your 1.01 now.

Postby cantguardjake » Mon Jan 11, 2021 2:54 pm

Ice wrote: Mon Jan 11, 2021 8:49 am After yet another horrible receiving game when rushing 18 plus times; 4 targets 2 catches 6 yards, thinking he is a top 3 Dynasty pick is an extremely risky position in ppr leagues.

He looks like a legit high carry back with low receiving potential.

Top 3....REALLY ?
He had 36 receptions for 300 yards at 8.31 ypc (one of the highest, if not highest marks in the league for a RB) through 14 games.

He might not catch 60 balls a year but I’d say he’s a fairly decent bet to be a 30-50 reception guy, he’s hardly Derrick Henry in the receiving game.

User avatar
murphysxm
Degenerate
Degenerate
Posts: 7698
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 8:10 am

Re: Jonathan Taylor is your 1.01 now.

Postby murphysxm » Mon Jan 11, 2021 3:02 pm

cantguardjake wrote: Mon Jan 11, 2021 2:54 pm
Ice wrote: Mon Jan 11, 2021 8:49 am After yet another horrible receiving game when rushing 18 plus times; 4 targets 2 catches 6 yards, thinking he is a top 3 Dynasty pick is an extremely risky position in ppr leagues.

He looks like a legit high carry back with low receiving potential.

Top 3....REALLY ?
He had 36 receptions for 300 yards at 8.31 ypc (one of the highest, if not highest marks in the league for a RB) through 14 games.

He might not catch 60 balls a year but I’d say he’s a fairly decent bet to be a 30-50 reception guy, he’s hardly Derrick Henry in the receiving game.
As long as Himes is in town, his ceiling is capped in the passng game, but I don't think it because he can't. Himes is just excellent at it
I am just a guy sharing some thoughts

jenkins.math
All Pro
All Pro
Posts: 1590
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2018 10:56 am

Re: Jonathan Taylor is your 1.01 now.

Postby jenkins.math » Mon Jan 11, 2021 4:15 pm

murphysxm wrote: Mon Jan 11, 2021 3:02 pm
cantguardjake wrote: Mon Jan 11, 2021 2:54 pm
Ice wrote: Mon Jan 11, 2021 8:49 am After yet another horrible receiving game when rushing 18 plus times; 4 targets 2 catches 6 yards, thinking he is a top 3 Dynasty pick is an extremely risky position in ppr leagues.

He looks like a legit high carry back with low receiving potential.

Top 3....REALLY ?
He had 36 receptions for 300 yards at 8.31 ypc (one of the highest, if not highest marks in the league for a RB) through 14 games.

He might not catch 60 balls a year but I’d say he’s a fairly decent bet to be a 30-50 reception guy, he’s hardly Derrick Henry in the receiving game.
As long as Himes is in town, his ceiling is capped in the passng game, but I don't think it because he can't. Himes is just excellent at it
Rivers is also a major boost to RBs catching passes.

User avatar
Hottoddies
Player of the Year
Player of the Year
Posts: 2313
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 5:29 pm

Re: Jonathan Taylor is your 1.01 now.

Postby Hottoddies » Sat Jan 23, 2021 3:01 am

Just for the heck of it I decided to see how Taylor and CEH fared against common opponents.

______Games___ATT___YDS___YPC___REC____YDS___TD___Fantasy Pts.
Taylor__6_______89_____488____5.5_____14_______77_____7______112.5
CEH____6______101_____493____4.9_____16______136_____3_______96.9
"Smart people learn from everything and everyone, average people from their experiences, stupid people already have all the answers." - Socrates

nathanq42
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame
Posts: 4021
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2014 7:40 am

Re: Jonathan Taylor is your 1.01 now.

Postby nathanq42 » Sat Jan 23, 2021 9:34 am

Hottoddies wrote: Sat Jan 23, 2021 3:01 am Just for the heck of it I decided to see how Taylor and CEH fared against common opponents.

______Games___ATT___YDS___YPC___REC____YDS___TD___Fantasy Pts.
Taylor__6_______89_____488____5.5_____14_______77_____7______112.5
CEH____6______101_____493____4.9_____16______136_____3_______96.9
Damn near identical other than TDs.
12 Team 1 ppr .1 points per carry
Garbage
QB Jalen Hurts
RB A-train, D'Onta Foreman,Jahmyr Gibbs, JK Dobbins, Rashaad Penny, AJ Dillon, Jerrick McKinnon, Joshua Kelley, TDP, Chase Edmonds, JRob, Zamir White
WR CeeDee Lamb, Justin Jefferson, DJ Moore, Hollywood Brown, Brandin Cooks, Odell Beckham Junior, Marvin Jones, Braxton Berrios, Richie James
TE Dalton Kincaid, Foster Moreau
+2 Flex
1.02, 1.06

smbkrypt24
Pro Bowler
Pro Bowler
Posts: 1220
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 8:36 pm

Re: Jonathan Taylor is your 1.01 now.

Postby smbkrypt24 » Sat Jan 23, 2021 10:10 am

Hottoddies wrote: Sat Jan 23, 2021 3:01 am Just for the heck of it I decided to see how Taylor and CEH fared against common opponents.

______Games___ATT___YDS___YPC___REC____YDS___TD___Fantasy Pts.
Taylor__6_______89_____488____5.5_____14_______77_____7______112.5
CEH____6______101_____493____4.9_____16______136_____3_______96.9
I am curious when those common games were. JT didn't start getting a big load until the end of the year.
12 Team PPR Dynasty. Start 1 QB, 1 RB, 1 WR, 1 TE, 3 Flex (RB/WR/TE), 1 K, 1 D, 21 roster spots.

2013 Startup
Team 1- 3rd in 2023
QB: Herbert, B. Purdy, Fields
RB: Bijan, Barkley, Akers, Dobbins
WR: T. Hill, D. Johnson, JSN, Doubs, Meyers, Thomas, Toney
TE: Andrews, Likely, Dulcic

2024: 1.01, 1.07
2025: 1, 2, 2

2019 Startup
Team 2- 4th in 2023
QB: Murray, Cousins, Wilson
RB: Bijan, Kamara, Dobbins, Rodriguez
WR: Chase, G. Wilson, D. Adams, Di. Johnson, M. Wilson, W. Robinson, R. Rice
TE: McBride, Pitts, Kmet, Likely

2024: 1.01, 1.06, 1.08, 2.09
2025: 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3

2021 Startup
Team 3- 11th in 2023
QB: Goff, Watson, Cousins, Levis, Rodgers, Young
RB: Gibbs, Pacheco, Dobbins
WR: Chase, J. Jefferson, JSN, Palmer, Mooney, Tillman
TE: Schultz, Pitts, Likely, Okonkwo

2024: 1.01, 1.02, 1.03, 1.04, 2.03, 2.06, 2.07, 2.10, 3.03, 3.06, 3.08
2025: 1, 2, 3

User avatar
MEuRaH
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6777
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 8:57 pm

Re: Jonathan Taylor is your 1.01 now.

Postby MEuRaH » Mon Jan 25, 2021 4:00 pm

In a full PPR league I'd be happy with either guy, though I'd expect JT to turn out better in the end, I wouldn't be shocked if CEH became the better back either. I'd be content with either guy. In all honesty if Dobbins was the #1 back next year vs JT/CEH, I wouldn't be surprised either.

In anything less than full PPR I'd rather own JT right now.
ULTIMATE RB GURUs
2021 RB Injury Guru: abloom "Akers will suffer an ACL injury in the preseason and does not play during the season."
2021 RB Guru: qazxswedcvfrtgbnhyuj & McCafsteez -- Winners of the Antonio Gibson Wager!

REAL RB GURUs:
CubfanAA - Anteaters - Ice - JJRules - TheNuts - jtk1234 - Bronco Billy - YouMightDieTryin - hockeyBjj - honcho55 - murphysxm - Patsfan86 - jman3134

OhCruelestRanter
MVP
MVP
Posts: 2732
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 5:33 pm

Re: Jonathan Taylor is your 1.01 now.

Postby OhCruelestRanter » Mon Jan 25, 2021 4:11 pm

dlf_mikeh wrote: Mon Jan 25, 2021 4:00 pm In a full PPR league I'd be happy with either guy, though I'd expect JT to turn out better in the end, I wouldn't be shocked if CEH became the better back either. I'd be content with either guy. In all honesty if Dobbins was the #1 back next year vs JT/CEH, I wouldn't be surprised either.

In anything less than full PPR I'd rather own JT right now.
Pretty good for the most overrated back in the class.

To be fair, CEH managed to score a TD despite averaging 1.2 YPC in his opportunities playing behind All-World talent Darrell Williams.
COOGAN IS A CHEATER AND A THIEF

StripesOfKC
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame
Posts: 4792
Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2019 6:38 pm

Re: Jonathan Taylor is your 1.01 now.

Postby StripesOfKC » Mon Jan 25, 2021 4:38 pm

OhCruelestRanter wrote: Mon Jan 25, 2021 4:11 pm
dlf_mikeh wrote: Mon Jan 25, 2021 4:00 pm In a full PPR league I'd be happy with either guy, though I'd expect JT to turn out better in the end, I wouldn't be shocked if CEH became the better back either. I'd be content with either guy. In all honesty if Dobbins was the #1 back next year vs JT/CEH, I wouldn't be surprised either.

In anything less than full PPR I'd rather own JT right now.
Pretty good for the most overrated back in the class.

To be fair, CEH managed to score a TD despite averaging 1.2 YPC in his opportunities playing behind All-World talent Darrell Williams.
He was hurt with the following OL after Fisher went down (also our starting OL for the Super Bowl):

LT: mike remmers—hasn’t played LT since 2016 and mostly a RG

LG: nick allrgreti—7th rounder in 2nd year

C: austin reiter—7th rounder

RG: Stefen Wiznewski: cut by steelers this year and signed a few weeks ago

RT: Andrew Wylie—UDFA guard

I see though that you have no interest in making fair comparisons. That would be far less snarky and not as clear cut (though I still prefer JT as I did last year)


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 120 guests