Rookie 1.01 and Startups

General talk about Dynasty Leagues.
jomaed
Pro Bowler
Pro Bowler
Posts: 1498
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2016 5:19 pm

Re: Rookie 1.01 and Startups

Postby jomaed » Thu Jan 09, 2020 11:25 am

Mjvb5 wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2020 10:58 am
jomaed wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2020 10:24 am
XclickX wrote: Wed Jan 08, 2020 9:20 am So in SF Burrow is worth a top 20-25 non qb?
DLF just put out an article with a SF startup mock that included rookie picks. Looks like 1.01 went 24th overall.
That feels high to me in SF, putting Burrow in the same conversation as Dak, Baker, Arod, Godwin, jacobs, Mixon, and Moore
Below Dak, Godwin, Jacobs, Mixon, but ahead of Baker, Arod, Moore.

OhCruelestRanter
MVP
MVP
Posts: 2732
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 5:33 pm

Re: Rookie 1.01 and Startups

Postby OhCruelestRanter » Thu Jan 09, 2020 11:38 am

jomaed wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2020 11:25 am
Mjvb5 wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2020 10:58 am
jomaed wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2020 10:24 am

DLF just put out an article with a SF startup mock that included rookie picks. Looks like 1.01 went 24th overall.
That feels high to me in SF, putting Burrow in the same conversation as Dak, Baker, Arod, Godwin, jacobs, Mixon, and Moore
Below Dak, Godwin, Jacobs, Mixon, but ahead of Baker, Arod, Moore.
Are we sure that Joe Burrow is the superflex 1.01?
COOGAN IS A CHEATER AND A THIEF

Mjvb5
Legend
Legend
Posts: 5449
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 7:29 am

Re: Rookie 1.01 and Startups

Postby Mjvb5 » Thu Jan 09, 2020 11:45 am

OhCruelestRanter wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2020 11:38 am
jomaed wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2020 11:25 am
Mjvb5 wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2020 10:58 am
That feels high to me in SF, putting Burrow in the same conversation as Dak, Baker, Arod, Godwin, jacobs, Mixon, and Moore
Below Dak, Godwin, Jacobs, Mixon, but ahead of Baker, Arod, Moore.
Are we sure that Joe Burrow is the superflex 1.01?
Most people I've seen view him as that currently. It might not stay that way and isn't to everyone (A lot of people have jeudy there still), and if an RB goes to KC or SF high they probably jump to 1.1. But right now I'd say he's the majority 1.1 but not a consensus

OhCruelestRanter
MVP
MVP
Posts: 2732
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 5:33 pm

Re: Rookie 1.01 and Startups

Postby OhCruelestRanter » Thu Jan 09, 2020 12:03 pm

Mjvb5 wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2020 11:45 am
OhCruelestRanter wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2020 11:38 am
jomaed wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2020 11:25 am

Below Dak, Godwin, Jacobs, Mixon, but ahead of Baker, Arod, Moore.
Are we sure that Joe Burrow is the superflex 1.01?
Most people I've seen view him as that currently. It might not stay that way and isn't to everyone (A lot of people have jeudy there still), and if an RB goes to KC or SF high they probably jump to 1.1. But right now I'd say he's the majority 1.1 but not a consensus
First, I should mention that "Superflex" is a broad term that encompasses multiple different formats where QBs are valued really differently. In my 14 team, 6 pt passing TD league, he'll be the 1.01. In my 12 team SF league with 4 pt TDs, 0.25 ppc, and 10 non-QB starters, my guess is he won't.

Having said that, it really might depend on rookie draft vs. startup draft. If KC takes Dobbins in the first, he's going to be going earlier than 24th overall in SF.
COOGAN IS A CHEATER AND A THIEF

DynoScout
Pro Bowler
Pro Bowler
Posts: 1089
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2015 7:30 am

Re: Rookie 1.01 and Startups

Postby DynoScout » Thu Jan 09, 2020 4:10 pm

OhCruelestRanter wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2020 11:38 am
jomaed wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2020 11:25 am
Mjvb5 wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2020 10:58 am
That feels high to me in SF, putting Burrow in the same conversation as Dak, Baker, Arod, Godwin, jacobs, Mixon, and Moore
Below Dak, Godwin, Jacobs, Mixon, but ahead of Baker, Arod, Moore.
Are we sure that Joe Burrow is the superflex 1.01?
Great question.
I am not sure, but he's probably the placeholder in most minds.


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CGW, FiremanEd, Google [Bot] and 45 guests