2020 NFL Free Agency

[Pac_Eddy]

Funchess to GB, apparently.

Good.

I didnt want that bum anywhere near Buffalo

Ha.

Funchess in Green Bay makes me feel better about losing three corners from the Vikings defense.

[ArrylT]

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300000 ... 020-season

One analysts take on the biggest moves so far

[Pullo Vision]

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300000 ... 020-season

One analysts take on the biggest moves so far

Thanks for sharing. Loved the Conklin and Sanders moves. Actually liked the Sanders one more than Diggs. Great value for the team, great ring move for Sanders.

[Pullo Vision]

Funchess to Green Bay is interesting. Keeping in mind he was seen as a TE/WR tweener as a prospect, it's interesting be went to a team with little proven at TE.

[Orenthal Shames]

DeAndre Washington seems like a sneaky good fit in KC

[Cameron Giles]

DeAndre Washington seems like a sneaky good fit in KC

He's...pretty bad.

[FantasyFreak]

DeAndre Washington seems like a sneaky good fit in KC

He's...pretty bad.

He's really not. He's not great or anything, but I've watched him here more than most, as I watch all Raiders games, and I am thinking that's a solid add for them, especially in that offense. He played well when Jacobs got hurt last year, too.

[Orenthal Shames]

DeAndre Washington seems like a sneaky good fit in KC

He's...pretty bad.

He's really not. He's not great or anything, but I've watched him here more than most, as I watch all Raiders games, and I am thinking that's a solid add for them, especially in that offense. He played well when Jacobs got hurt last year, too.

He's not going to light the world on fire, but is a decent enough athlete with good hands. Between him, Mike Weber, Elijah Holyfield, Darrell Williams and Darwin Thompson the Chiefs ought to be able to find a few viable cheap backup options at RB.

[FantasyFreak]

He's...pretty bad.

He's really not. He's not great or anything, but I've watched him here more than most, as I watch all Raiders games, and I am thinking that's a solid add for them, especially in that offense. He played well when Jacobs got hurt last year, too.

He's not going to light the world on fire, but is a decent enough athlete with good hands. Between him, Mike Weber, Elijah Holyfield, Darrell Williams and Darwin Thompson the Chiefs ought to be able to find a few viable cheap backup options at RB.

Washington would immediately climb to 2nd behind Williams on that depth chart, as it stands.

[Cowboysfan33]

He's really not. He's not great or anything, but I've watched him here more than most, as I watch all Raiders games, and I am thinking that's a solid add for them, especially in that offense. He played well when Jacobs got hurt last year, too.

He's not going to light the world on fire, but is a decent enough athlete with good hands. Between him, Mike Weber, Elijah Holyfield, Darrell Williams and Darwin Thompson the Chiefs ought to be able to find a few viable cheap backup options at RB.

Washington would immediately climb to 2nd behind Williams on that depth chart, as it stands.

I’ve always thought he was pretty solid. FWIW, I actually started him in one of my championship games last season and he scored like 18 points and I won, so I’ll always like him a little more than most, ha!

[Hottoddies]

He's really not. He's not great or anything, but I've watched him here more than most, as I watch all Raiders games, and I am thinking that's a solid add for them, especially in that offense. He played well when Jacobs got hurt last year, too.

He's not going to light the world on fire, but is a decent enough athlete with good hands. Between him, Mike Weber, Elijah Holyfield, Darrell Williams and Darwin Thompson the Chiefs ought to be able to find a few viable cheap backup options at RB.

Washington would immediately climb to 2nd behind Williams on that depth chart, as it stands.

I agree that Washington is a decent player and could thrive in Kansas City's offense. I think the key will be if he can get a handle on their complex system.

[Orenthal Shames]

Reagor 10 lbs lighter (198) for his video pro-day. Ran 4.22 & 4.28

https://t.co/eTJ6sAqWLL

[FantasyFreak]

Reagor 10 lbs lighter (198) for his video pro-day. Ran 4.22 & 4.28

https://t.co/eTJ6sAqWLL

Don't believe it. Especially without actual impartial people there. No way he can cut .2 seconds boy losing 8 pounds. Just like I don't believe Moss ran a 4.52. Lies.

[Orenthal Shames]

Reagor 10 lbs lighter (198) for his video pro-day. Ran 4.22 & 4.28

https://t.co/eTJ6sAqWLL

Don't believe it. Especially without actual impartial people there. No way he can cut .2 seconds boy losing 8 pounds. Just like I don't believe Moss ran a 4.52. Lies.

Doesn't playerprofiler add .1 to pro-day times? 4.32 & 4.38 seem reasonable.

[FantasyFreak]

Reagor 10 lbs lighter (198) for his video pro-day. Ran 4.22 & 4.28

https://t.co/eTJ6sAqWLL

Don't believe it. Especially without actual impartial people there. No way he can cut .2 seconds boy losing 8 pounds. Just like I don't believe Moss ran a 4.52. Lies.

Doesn't playerprofiler add .1 to pro-day times? 4.32 & 4.38 seem reasonable.

.05. That would be 4.27 and 4.33. That's a lot of time to shave. I really don't believe it. Probably were generous on the stop or start, with the hand too.

Also claiming 3.97 and 4.04 on his short shuttle, down from 4.46. That's a ridiculous difference. I am not believing these remote times with no impartial people. Could be running with a big wind behind him, too. It's just extremely unlikely. I'm sure he's faster at that weight, but not that much. I'd imagine he's pushing 4.4 flat.