Week 14 Discussion
-
- Practice Squad
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:23 am
Re: Week 14 Discussion
Did the announcer really just say at this stage of the game down 14, 8 at the time of the play that the book says go for it? These announcers blow! With a fg your down by a touchdown with 3 minutes Left in the third. C’mon man!
Re: Week 14 Discussion
Ya, that made no sense. That doesn't reduce the number of times you have to score, and just means you have to go for it again if you don't get it. The ESPN crew is absolute garbage.purplepride28 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 8:31 pm Did the announcer really just say at this stage of the game down 14, 8 at the time of the play that the book says go for it? These announcers blow! With a fg your down by a touchdown with 3 minutes Left in the third. C’mon man!
-
- GOAT
- Posts: 27241
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2014 1:03 am
Re: Week 14 Discussion
It's Booger. Same guy who said the Vikings have been on the wrong side of strange plays in recent years, like the Minneapolis Miracle.bjd5211 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 8:36 pmYa, that made no sense. That doesn't reduce the number of times you have to score, and just means you have to go for it again if you don't get it. The ESPN crew is absolute garbage.purplepride28 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 8:31 pm Did the announcer really just say at this stage of the game down 14, 8 at the time of the play that the book says go for it? These announcers blow! With a fg your down by a touchdown with 3 minutes Left in the third. C’mon man!
"You're a creep. You got caught.." -Dan Patrick
Re: Week 14 Discussion
It was Tessatore that said it.FantasyFreak wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 8:39 pmIt's Booger. Same guy who said the Vikings have been on the wrong side of strange plays in recent years, like the Minneapolis Miracle.bjd5211 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 8:36 pmYa, that made no sense. That doesn't reduce the number of times you have to score, and just means you have to go for it again if you don't get it. The ESPN crew is absolute garbage.purplepride28 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 8:31 pm Did the announcer really just say at this stage of the game down 14, 8 at the time of the play that the book says go for it? These announcers blow! With a fg your down by a touchdown with 3 minutes Left in the third. C’mon man!
-
- Practice Squad
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:23 am
Re: Week 14 Discussion
Would had been a shame had they went for 2 and not gotten it. Because this drive wouldn’t be able to tie it up lol
Boston Scott taking this game over
Boston Scott taking this game over
-
- Practice Squad
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:23 am
Re: Week 14 Discussion
Eagles pass interfered themselves by tipping it. That was intended for white side and tipped so no pass interference
-
- MVP
- Posts: 2705
- Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2014 8:07 pm
Re: Week 14 Discussion
Booger: “when it is cold outside, as a player you think ‘i don’t need to drink to stay hydrated’, but in reality you need to drink more because your body sweats the same”.
Wait, what? Where did the MORE come in? I feel like this is 5 year old logic in the body of an NFL play by play announcer.
Wait, what? Where did the MORE come in? I feel like this is 5 year old logic in the body of an NFL play by play announcer.
Gopher Two
PPR SF, WR & TE Premium (WR 1.2 PPR , TE 1.5 PPR), 10 total starters, 1 QB, 1SF, 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 3 Flex
QB: Mahomes, Prescott, Mayfield
RB: Hall, Pacheco, Jacobs, Connor, Chubb, Mattison
WR: Tyreek, AJ Brown, Flowers, CSutton, JJeudy, Slayton, Iosivas
TE: McBride, DSchultz, Musgrave, Kraft, MGesicki
2024: 1.02, 2.02
2022 and 2023 League Champ
SafeLeague #1 (12 team, SF, 2.0 PPR TE Prem). 10 total starters 1 QB, 1SF (QB/TE/RB/WR), 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 3 Flex
QB: Purdy, Levis, DTR
RB: Pacheco + scrubs
WR: Downs, MMims, EMoore, Jeudy, MWilson + scrubs
TE: Hock, Kincaid, Pitts, Mayer + scrubs
2024: 1.01, 1.05, 1.11, 2.01, 2.02, 2.06,
2025: 2 1sts, 2 2nds
SafeLeague #2
QB: Purdy, Richardson, Hooker, Willis
RB: literal ZERO RB (for now)
WR: Mingo, MMims, Toney, Skyy, Iosivas
TE: LaPorta, Kincaid, McBride, Mayer, Musgrave, Schoonmaker (and a bunch more 2nd stringers)
2024: 1.01, 1.05, 1.06, 1.08, 1.09, 1.10, 2.01, 2.05, 2.06
2025: 1 1st, 1 2nd
PPR SF, WR & TE Premium (WR 1.2 PPR , TE 1.5 PPR), 10 total starters, 1 QB, 1SF, 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 3 Flex
QB: Mahomes, Prescott, Mayfield
RB: Hall, Pacheco, Jacobs, Connor, Chubb, Mattison
WR: Tyreek, AJ Brown, Flowers, CSutton, JJeudy, Slayton, Iosivas
TE: McBride, DSchultz, Musgrave, Kraft, MGesicki
2024: 1.02, 2.02
2022 and 2023 League Champ
SafeLeague #1 (12 team, SF, 2.0 PPR TE Prem). 10 total starters 1 QB, 1SF (QB/TE/RB/WR), 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 3 Flex
QB: Purdy, Levis, DTR
RB: Pacheco + scrubs
WR: Downs, MMims, EMoore, Jeudy, MWilson + scrubs
TE: Hock, Kincaid, Pitts, Mayer + scrubs
2024: 1.01, 1.05, 1.11, 2.01, 2.02, 2.06,
2025: 2 1sts, 2 2nds
SafeLeague #2
QB: Purdy, Richardson, Hooker, Willis
RB: literal ZERO RB (for now)
WR: Mingo, MMims, Toney, Skyy, Iosivas
TE: LaPorta, Kincaid, McBride, Mayer, Musgrave, Schoonmaker (and a bunch more 2nd stringers)
2024: 1.01, 1.05, 1.06, 1.08, 1.09, 1.10, 2.01, 2.05, 2.06
2025: 1 1st, 1 2nd
Re: Week 14 Discussion
Well they would have to go for 2 again, but risk missing that one too. The whole point of going for 2 is to reduce the number of possessions it takes to tie the game, but being down 14 is a 2 possession game whether you go for 2 or not, so they would gain no advantage and risk putting themselves in a bigger hole.purplepride28 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 8:44 pm Would had been a shame had they went for 2 and not gotten it. Because this drive wouldn’t be able to tie it up lol
Boston Scott taking this game over
-
- GOAT
- Posts: 27241
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2014 1:03 am
Re: Week 14 Discussion
Was going to say the same thing, but had to step out for a minute. You beat me to it.Shcritters wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 8:50 pm Booger: “when it is cold outside, as a player you think ‘i don’t need to drink to stay hydrated’, but in reality you need to drink more because your body sweats the same”.
Wait, what? Where did the MORE come in? I feel like this is 5 year old logic in the body of an NFL play by play announcer.
"You're a creep. You got caught.." -Dan Patrick
Re: Week 14 Discussion
He's so terrible. How can they not find someone better? I love football, but I kind of dread MNF because the entire crew is so terrible.Shcritters wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 8:50 pm Booger: “when it is cold outside, as a player you think ‘i don’t need to drink to stay hydrated’, but in reality you need to drink more because your body sweats the same”.
Wait, what? Where did the MORE come in? I feel like this is 5 year old logic in the body of an NFL play by play announcer.
-
- Practice Squad
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:23 am
Re: Week 14 Discussion
Right! And if “your into analytics” like he said about it your odds are actually lower.bjd5211 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 8:53 pmWell they would have to go for 2 again, but risk missing that one too. The whole point of going for 2 is to reduce the number of possessions it takes to tie the game, but being down 14 is a 2 possession game whether you go for 2 or not, so they would gain no advantage and risk putting themselves in a bigger hole.purplepride28 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 8:44 pm Would had been a shame had they went for 2 and not gotten it. Because this drive wouldn’t be able to tie it up lol
Boston Scott taking this game over
-
- Practice Squad
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:23 am
Re: Week 14 Discussion
It’s like listening to to stupid pre recorded madden video game sayings that don’t match up with the play even!
-
- GOAT
- Posts: 27241
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2014 1:03 am
Re: Week 14 Discussion
Why wouldn't Eli audible out of a flea flicker against a sticks Defense? Why even call that on 3rd and 14 to begin with?
BTW, the Eagles WR corps had another egregious drop that would have been a TD. Big surprise.
BTW, the Eagles WR corps had another egregious drop that would have been a TD. Big surprise.
"You're a creep. You got caught.." -Dan Patrick
-
- Legend
- Posts: 6519
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 12:13 pm
Re: Week 14 Discussion
That’s some Yogi Berra type bleep there...Shcritters wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 8:50 pm Booger: “when it is cold outside, as a player you think ‘i don’t need to drink to stay hydrated’, but in reality you need to drink more because your body sweats the same”.
Wait, what? Where did the MORE come in? I feel like this is 5 year old logic in the body of an NFL play by play announcer.
All I Der Is Win - 16 Team IDP League (Pass TD 6pts)
QB - Stafford, Stroud, Tune
RB - Swift, Hall, Penny, Bigsby, Ford
WR - Pittman, Olave, Di. Johnson, G. Wilson, J. Williams, Metchie, Robinson, M. Wilson
TE - Okonkwo, Schoonmaker
LB - Brooks, R. Smith, Phillips
DL - Crosby, Allen, Simmons
DB - D. James, Baker, Delpit
K - Just a stupid kicker
QB - Stafford, Stroud, Tune
RB - Swift, Hall, Penny, Bigsby, Ford
WR - Pittman, Olave, Di. Johnson, G. Wilson, J. Williams, Metchie, Robinson, M. Wilson
TE - Okonkwo, Schoonmaker
LB - Brooks, R. Smith, Phillips
DL - Crosby, Allen, Simmons
DB - D. James, Baker, Delpit
K - Just a stupid kicker
Re: Week 14 Discussion
The book says to go for two when you are down by 8. The EV of going for two is > than kicking the PAT. I thought this forum would know that? The announcers were totally right. You have a better chance of winning the game going for two down 8 than kicking the PAT to take it to 7.purplepride28 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 8:57 pmRight! And if “your into analytics” like he said about it your odds are actually lower.bjd5211 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 8:53 pmWell they would have to go for 2 again, but risk missing that one too. The whole point of going for 2 is to reduce the number of possessions it takes to tie the game, but being down 14 is a 2 possession game whether you go for 2 or not, so they would gain no advantage and risk putting themselves in a bigger hole.purplepride28 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 09, 2019 8:44 pm Would had been a shame had they went for 2 and not gotten it. Because this drive wouldn’t be able to tie it up lol
Boston Scott taking this game over
Last edited by PR0v3 on Mon Dec 09, 2019 9:16 pm, edited 2 times in total.
12 Team .5 PPR - 1 QB, 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 1 WR/RB 20 man rosters, 5 man taxi est. 2018
QB: Dak, Pickett
RB: CMC, Taylor, Gibson, Dillon, Akers, Penny
WR: JJeff, Hollywood, Olave, Toney, Aiyuk, Jeudy, C. Davis, Boyd, C. Samuel,
TE: Njoku, Gesicki
2023 picks: 1.x, 2.x, 3.x, 4.x
QB: Dak, Pickett
RB: CMC, Taylor, Gibson, Dillon, Akers, Penny
WR: JJeff, Hollywood, Olave, Toney, Aiyuk, Jeudy, C. Davis, Boyd, C. Samuel,
TE: Njoku, Gesicki
2023 picks: 1.x, 2.x, 3.x, 4.x
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot] and 104 guests