Since the subject is drafts/free agency, it makes sense to refer to Jordy's absence as a plural. Two years of opportunities to address the hole.djeternal2 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2019 12:05 pmInteresting you pick 40 & 600 as your marks since MVS had 38 & 581 last year. I'd say that's close enough. Funny the way you phrase it as if Jordy's been gone for years from the Pack; but, it's only been one year.
Now we're kind of straying away from the topic of the threat towards GB talk, but I won't complain.remedy29 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2019 10:59 pmConventional wisdom says that an elite QB will make his WRs better. GB is void of talent, not just at WR. Why would they be an obvious choice to draft a WR over other positions? Just because it helps our precious fantasy teams? NFL teams don't win by putting up fantasy points at the skill positions.
I dunno if void of talent is fair. The offense isn't really lacking anywhere except WR, even if the top-end talent isn't exceptional. And the Packers have sold out to improve the defense over the last few offseasons, albeit they haven't shown results. And I'm certainly of the belief that good receivers are important to a QB, no matter how elite they are. Not talking fantasy terms, but real NFL.