Mandatory Trade Leagues
-
- Captain
- Posts: 991
- Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2013 2:25 pm
Re: Mandatory Trade Leagues
then again, the reason we play this make believe game is for fun. if mandatory trades are fun to people who knowningly enter into such leagues, more power to them.
-
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 4537
- Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 5:11 pm
Re: Mandatory Trade Leagues
Yeah, I’m not a fan but there are all types of different league rules that I’m not interested in doing. Obviously this type of rule would have to be set in place from the get go, because trying to implement this post startup would be a cluster.pvillebiker wrote: ↑Wed Jul 31, 2019 4:28 pm then again, the reason we play this make believe game is for fun. if mandatory trades are fun to people who knowningly enter into such leagues, more power to them.
-
- Player of the Year
- Posts: 2223
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2014 9:54 am
Re: Mandatory Trade Leagues
Auction with no salary cap??? How does that work? Fixed amount for auction and waivers that resets each year but no cap on total team budget?rubber_duck wrote: ↑Wed Jul 31, 2019 1:09 pmNot a big fan of this idea, but I can see how this could work. My primary league is an auction format with no salary cap. Each year the rookies are auctioned off to the highest bidder. Any unspent money is saved for later use (e.g. trades, free agents, or next year's rookies).
In a league like that, these "forced" trades could be done for straight cash. This makes determination of the best offer trivial.
Dynasty League (25 man rosters + 2 IR, non-PPR scoring. QB/3RB/3WR/2TE/K/DB/LB/DL no flex)
QB (1): Herbert, Lawrence, Darnold
RB (3): N. Chubb, D. Henry, J. Taylor, JK Dobbins, Pollard, Singletary, L. Murray
WR (3): D. Hopkins, D. Adams, M. Evans, D.J. Moore, DJ Chark, B. Aiyuk, J. Smith-Schuster, R Bateman, E. Moore
TE (2): I. Smith Jr, H. Henry, Schultz, Tremble
K (1): M. Crosby
DB (1): J. Adams
LB (1): F. Warner
DL (1): D. Lawrence
PS: I often don't revisit a thread after posting. Send me a message if you ever want further thoughts on a comment I made.
QB (1): Herbert, Lawrence, Darnold
RB (3): N. Chubb, D. Henry, J. Taylor, JK Dobbins, Pollard, Singletary, L. Murray
WR (3): D. Hopkins, D. Adams, M. Evans, D.J. Moore, DJ Chark, B. Aiyuk, J. Smith-Schuster, R Bateman, E. Moore
TE (2): I. Smith Jr, H. Henry, Schultz, Tremble
K (1): M. Crosby
DB (1): J. Adams
LB (1): F. Warner
DL (1): D. Lawrence
PS: I often don't revisit a thread after posting. Send me a message if you ever want further thoughts on a comment I made.
- dynastyninja
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 4174
- Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 6:17 pm
Re: Mandatory Trade Leagues
Bunch of prudes in here. I think it would be a fun, alternative league. You don't have to implement it in every league you do.
Re: Mandatory Trade Leagues
From my understanding you typically get money from your placement, so last place would get X amount of dollars, all the way down to first place. Those funds can be traded/etc.jetsfan5757 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 06, 2019 7:42 amAuction with no salary cap??? How does that work? Fixed amount for auction and waivers that resets each year but no cap on total team budget?rubber_duck wrote: ↑Wed Jul 31, 2019 1:09 pmNot a big fan of this idea, but I can see how this could work. My primary league is an auction format with no salary cap. Each year the rookies are auctioned off to the highest bidder. Any unspent money is saved for later use (e.g. trades, free agents, or next year's rookies).
In a league like that, these "forced" trades could be done for straight cash. This makes determination of the best offer trivial.
- rubber_duck
- Pro Bowler
- Posts: 1126
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 11:02 am
Re: Mandatory Trade Leagues
Yup. That's the general concept. At the end of each season the worst team receives the most Fantasy money to spend in the upcoming year. The best team receives the least amount of money.Jason3123 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 06, 2019 9:17 amFrom my understanding you typically get money from your placement, so last place would get X amount of dollars, all the way down to first place. Those funds can be traded/etc.jetsfan5757 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 06, 2019 7:42 amAuction with no salary cap??? How does that work? Fixed amount for auction and waivers that resets each year but no cap on total team budget?rubber_duck wrote: ↑Wed Jul 31, 2019 1:09 pm
Not a big fan of this idea, but I can see how this could work. My primary league is an auction format with no salary cap. Each year the rookies are auctioned off to the highest bidder. Any unspent money is saved for later use (e.g. trades, free agents, or next year's rookies).
In a league like that, these "forced" trades could be done for straight cash. This makes determination of the best offer trivial.
The really fun part ... there is no compelling reason to spend your money during the rookie auction. You can save it for later: trades, waivers, etc. This league has been going for a very long time, and we have had people save money for 2 or 3 years and then really tear up a rookie auction!
If you do not care much for a crop of rookies (such as this year), then you don't have to spend much. Just save your money. It is easy to tell what our league thinks of a rookie class. The money really starts to fly when the talent is perceived to be there.
Re: Mandatory Trade Leagues
Completely agree with this. In my dynasty league I've been trying to get people more involved with making moves by writing up short articles and posting them on our league page where we either praise or bash trades that have happened and try to get people talking about it and thus more interested in trading overall. I also offer a six pack of blue moon for the team with the best trade of the season at the season's endmeineymoe wrote: ↑Wed Jul 31, 2019 3:09 pm There are ways to promote trading - for instance, give awards for best trade, based on a league-wide poll, or most active owner, or any of other various reward scenarios you can come up with... forcing owners to trade or even be more active than they are comfortable with won't end well.
-oo-
Team 1
10 team, 2 QB, 3 RB, 3 WR, 1 TE, 1WR/TE, 1 RB/WR/TE, DEF, .5 ppr
QB: D. Prescott, K. Cousins, A. Richardson, R. Tannehill, T. Lance
RB: A. Kamara, S. Barkley, Bi. Robinson, J. Conner, J. Dobbins, A. Dillon, D. Harris, R. Stephenson, K. Herbert, I. Spiller, Br. Robinson, K. Ingram, T. Spears, D. Foreman
WR: M. Evans, D. Adams, AJ Brown, C. Lamb, J. Waddle, K. Toney, J. Reed
TE: D. Waller, P. Friermuth, D. Kincaid
10 team, 2 QB, 3 RB, 3 WR, 1 TE, 1WR/TE, 1 RB/WR/TE, DEF, .5 ppr
QB: D. Prescott, K. Cousins, A. Richardson, R. Tannehill, T. Lance
RB: A. Kamara, S. Barkley, Bi. Robinson, J. Conner, J. Dobbins, A. Dillon, D. Harris, R. Stephenson, K. Herbert, I. Spiller, Br. Robinson, K. Ingram, T. Spears, D. Foreman
WR: M. Evans, D. Adams, AJ Brown, C. Lamb, J. Waddle, K. Toney, J. Reed
TE: D. Waller, P. Friermuth, D. Kincaid
Re: Mandatory Trade Leagues
Why would you penalize the best trade?QB Browns wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2019 6:01 amCompletely agree with this. In my dynasty league I've been trying to get people more involved with making moves by writing up short articles and posting them on our league page where we either praise or bash trades that have happened and try to get people talking about it and thus more interested in trading overall. I also offer a six pack of blue moon for the team with the best trade of the season at the season's endmeineymoe wrote: ↑Wed Jul 31, 2019 3:09 pm There are ways to promote trading - for instance, give awards for best trade, based on a league-wide poll, or most active owner, or any of other various reward scenarios you can come up with... forcing owners to trade or even be more active than they are comfortable with won't end well.
-oo-
Both are 12-team 1QB PPR dynasties
🦬PRIME🦬
QB: Hurts, Howell
RB: Mixon, Jones, Sanders, Dobbins, Akers, Roschon, Dowdle, Kelley
WR: Nuk, Godwin, Cooper, Lockett, Flowers, Chark, Collins, Hollins, Tillman, Tolbert
TE: Hockenson, Chig, Trautman
Taxi: Willis, Z. White, M. Mims, T. Palmer
Hull Awaits
$450 cap, 60 contract years
QB: Lawrence $5/3, Richardson $5/5, Minshew $1/0, Jones $1/0, Heinicke $1/0, Tyrod $1/0
RB: Achane $4/4, Warren $2/4, Roschon $7/5, Dillon $4/1, Hubbard $2/1, Kelley $1/0
WR: Nuk $78/1, MT $25/1, M. Williams $1/0, JSN $21/5, Reed $4/5, Rice $4/5, M. Wilson $2/5
TE: Thomas $1/0, Hill $1/0, Parham $1/0
🦬PRIME🦬
QB: Hurts, Howell
RB: Mixon, Jones, Sanders, Dobbins, Akers, Roschon, Dowdle, Kelley
WR: Nuk, Godwin, Cooper, Lockett, Flowers, Chark, Collins, Hollins, Tillman, Tolbert
TE: Hockenson, Chig, Trautman
Taxi: Willis, Z. White, M. Mims, T. Palmer
Hull Awaits
$450 cap, 60 contract years
QB: Lawrence $5/3, Richardson $5/5, Minshew $1/0, Jones $1/0, Heinicke $1/0, Tyrod $1/0
RB: Achane $4/4, Warren $2/4, Roschon $7/5, Dillon $4/1, Hubbard $2/1, Kelley $1/0
WR: Nuk $78/1, MT $25/1, M. Williams $1/0, JSN $21/5, Reed $4/5, Rice $4/5, M. Wilson $2/5
TE: Thomas $1/0, Hill $1/0, Parham $1/0
Re: Mandatory Trade Leagues
Thems fightin wordsM-Dub wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2019 9:00 amWhy would you penalize the best trade?QB Browns wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2019 6:01 amCompletely agree with this. In my dynasty league I've been trying to get people more involved with making moves by writing up short articles and posting them on our league page where we either praise or bash trades that have happened and try to get people talking about it and thus more interested in trading overall. I also offer a six pack of blue moon for the team with the best trade of the season at the season's endmeineymoe wrote: ↑Wed Jul 31, 2019 3:09 pm There are ways to promote trading - for instance, give awards for best trade, based on a league-wide poll, or most active owner, or any of other various reward scenarios you can come up with... forcing owners to trade or even be more active than they are comfortable with won't end well.
-oo-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Dragon_Breath5 and 124 guests