Dynasty League Football Forum

Jigga94 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2019 1:38 pm

MattDeezy wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2019 11:06 am In a 2TE SF league, Hock was taken at 1.03 and I took Fant at 1.04. The Hock owner then offered me his Hock for my Fant straight up which I accepted.

Lol reminds me of when I took Baker right after Darnold. I offered Baker and a throw in for Darnold and they declined... Come mid season they offered me Darnold for Baker straight up.. No thanks

Hoping my Hock is your Baker

12 team start 2 TE, TE also receives double the points per reception.

Hock 1.02
Fant 1.05
*I owned both the 1.04 and 1.05 so you can technically say Fant was 1.04.

XclickX wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2019 3:21 pm 12 team start 2 TE, TE also receives double the points per reception.

Hock 1.02
Fant 1.05
*I owned both the 1.04 and 1.05 so you can technically say Fant was 1.04.

In this format I would strongly consider them as the top 2 picks. 2TE plus a major premium makes TE extremely valuable, depending on the other league rules.

Fant 1.04
Hock 1.07

That's the earliest I've seen Fant go. 12-man, 1 ppr league. We start qb-rb-rb-rb-wr-wr-wr-wr-te-flex-k-d.

GREAT THREAD.

MattDeezy wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2019 11:06 am In a 2TE SF league, Hock was taken at 1.03 and I took Fant at 1.04. The Hock owner then offered me his Hock for my Fant straight up which I accepted.

Did he have a reason? Did he accidentally choose Hockenson when he meant to draft Fant? Not that I have any issue with that - just never seen a guy get drafted then traded immediately for the next guy who got drafted.

bjd5211 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2019 4:25 pm

XclickX wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2019 3:21 pm 12 team start 2 TE, TE also receives double the points per reception.

Hock 1.02
Fant 1.05
*I owned both the 1.04 and 1.05 so you can technically say Fant was 1.04.

In this format I would strongly consider them as the top 2 picks. 2TE plus a major premium makes TE extremely valuable, depending on the other league rules.

Agreed they should have went 1-2. I was stoked 1 of the 2 was on the board at pick 4. The rest of the league rules are normal. Only the premium for the TE.

I have seen hock at 7, fant at 9
Fant at 8, hock at 9
And fant at 8, hock at 12

First 2 are 14 teams, last is 16 team contract league where kelce outscored all wrs both total and per game and ertz was 2nd. In total little was 4th and ebron 13th among wrs and tes combined

XclickX wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2019 6:17 pm

bjd5211 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2019 4:25 pm

XclickX wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2019 3:21 pm 12 team start 2 TE, TE also receives double the points per reception.

Hock 1.02
Fant 1.05
*I owned both the 1.04 and 1.05 so you can technically say Fant was 1.04.

In this format I would strongly consider them as the top 2 picks. 2TE plus a major premium makes TE extremely valuable, depending on the other league rules.

Agreed they should have went 1-2. I was stoked 1 of the 2 was on the board at pick 4. The rest of the league rules are normal. Only the premium for the TE.

1QB? In SF I could see taking Kyler 1.01 still, and 2QB I would definitely take Kyler 1 and probably Haskins 2, then the Iowa TEs 3 and 4. 1QB league though I would take the TEs top 2 for sure.

ArrylT wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2019 5:36 pm

MattDeezy wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2019 11:06 am In a 2TE SF league, Hock was taken at 1.03 and I took Fant at 1.04. The Hock owner then offered me his Hock for my Fant straight up which I accepted.

Did he have a reason? Did he accidentally choose Hockenson when he meant to draft Fant? Not that I have any issue with that - just never seen a guy get drafted then traded immediately for the next guy who got drafted.

His reason was because he has Flacco/Lock and wanted to tag the QB/TE combo. I already have a share of Fant so I figured diversifying makes sense as I have them basically evenly ranked. Also scooped up Irv Smith which I’m pretty happy about.

bjd5211 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2019 7:10 pm

XclickX wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2019 6:17 pm

bjd5211 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 03, 2019 4:25 pm

In this format I would strongly consider them as the top 2 picks. 2TE plus a major premium makes TE extremely valuable, depending on the other league rules.

Agreed they should have went 1-2. I was stoked 1 of the 2 was on the board at pick 4. The rest of the league rules are normal. Only the premium for the TE.

1QB? In SF I could see taking Kyler 1.01 still, and 2QB I would definitely take Kyler 1 and probably Haskins 2, then the Iowa TEs 3 and 4. 1QB league though I would take the TEs top 2 for sure.

1 qb, 2 te , 2 wr , 2 rb and 3 flex.

I am in a league where you're required to start 2 TE (sf/2te) and they went back to back at 1.02 & 1.03.

How would everyone feel about someone taking BOTH?

I have pick 1.05 and 1.13. It's very plausible i get fant at 13.

Have HH and Olsen as my tight ends now. Have HH hock and fant going forward could be dynamite

MrUbuto wrote: ↑Sun Jun 09, 2019 6:08 pm How would everyone feel about someone taking BOTH?

I have pick 1.05 and 1.13. It's very plausible i get fant at 13.

Have HH and Olsen as my tight ends now. Have HH hock and fant going forward could be dynamite

Taking Hockenson at 1.05 might be a bit early.

They went back-to-back in my 14 team superflex rookie draft. Hock went 1.11, and I traded up and took Fant at 1.12.

Hottoddies wrote: ↑Sun Jun 09, 2019 6:47 pm

MrUbuto wrote: ↑Sun Jun 09, 2019 6:08 pm How would everyone feel about someone taking BOTH?

I have pick 1.05 and 1.13. It's very plausible i get fant at 13.

Have HH and Olsen as my tight ends now. Have HH hock and fant going forward could be dynamite

Taking Hockenson at 1.05 might be a bit early.

Who would you take instead? For me the top 4 is pretty defined. Mont Jacob's Sanders and harry. Than we're in tier 2 and I see hock as potentially generational talent. I'd rather have him over deebo Campbell dk etc