Hock & Fant Relative Rookie ADP

General talk about Dynasty Leagues.

How far apart did Hock and Fant go in your rookie draft?

One after another (i.e. 7th and 8th)
8
15%
1 Pick apart (i.e. 7th and 9th)
8
15%
2 Picks apart
6
11%
3 Picks apart
12
22%
4+ Picks apart
21
38%
 
Total votes: 55

User avatar
MattDeezy
Role Player
Role Player
Posts: 309
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2018 3:37 pm

Re: Hock & Fant Relative Rookie ADP

Postby MattDeezy » Mon Jun 03, 2019 3:02 pm

Jigga94 wrote:
Mon Jun 03, 2019 1:38 pm
MattDeezy wrote:
Mon Jun 03, 2019 11:06 am
In a 2TE SF league, Hock was taken at 1.03 and I took Fant at 1.04. The Hock owner then offered me his Hock for my Fant straight up which I accepted.
Lol reminds me of when I took Baker right after Darnold. I offered Baker and a throw in for Darnold and they declined... Come mid season they offered me Darnold for Baker straight up.. No thanks
Hoping my Hock is your Baker 👍
A
12Tm PPR SF TE Prem.
1Q|2R|3W|1T|1SF|2FLX
Q: Mayfield, Cam, Bortles, TeddyB, Brissett
R: Henry, Ingram, Samuels, Martin, BHill
W: MThomas, MVS, EqSB, Samuel, Parker, Stills, DaMoore, Crab, Ateman, Gabriel
T: OJHoward, Gesicki, Shaheen
2019: 2.2
2020: 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 4

B
12Tm PPR TE Prem.
1Q|2R|3W|1T|2FLX
Q: Luck, Cousins, Rudolph
R: DJ, Michel, McCoy, JWilliams, Wilkins
W: OBJ, GTate, Dede, Hamilton, EqSB, Reynolds, DaMoore, Crab, Cain
T: Burton, Rudolph, Fumagalli
2019: 1.11, 2.3, 4.6
2020: 1, 1, 1, 4

C
12Tm PPR SF
1Q|2R|3W|1T|1SF|2FLX|1K|1D
Q: Ryan, Trubisky
R: Kerryon, DFreeman, Hunt, Ekeler, Dixon, Clement
W: OBJ, Adams, Alshon, Samuel, Reynolds, Taywan, Zay
T: Howard, Njoku, Ian Thomas
2019: 3.2, 3.6, 4.2, 4.6

D
10Tm PPR
2Q|2R|3W|2T|3FLX
Q: Luck, Watson, Foles
R: Guice, Henry, Howard, Miller, RoJo, Samuels
W: Landry, Fuller, Shepard, GTate, Humphries, Funchess, DaMoore
T: Ertz, Howard, Gesicki
2019: 1.5, 1.6, 1.8

XclickX
Practice Squad
Practice Squad
Posts: 228
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2018 4:11 pm

Re: Hock & Fant Relative Rookie ADP

Postby XclickX » Mon Jun 03, 2019 3:21 pm

12 team start 2 TE, TE also receives double the points per reception.

Hock 1.02
Fant 1.05
*I owned both the 1.04 and 1.05 so you can technically say Fant was 1.04.

Online
bjd5211
Pro Bowler
Pro Bowler
Posts: 1352
Joined: Wed May 03, 2017 11:50 am

Re: Hock & Fant Relative Rookie ADP

Postby bjd5211 » Mon Jun 03, 2019 4:25 pm

XclickX wrote:
Mon Jun 03, 2019 3:21 pm
12 team start 2 TE, TE also receives double the points per reception.

Hock 1.02
Fant 1.05
*I owned both the 1.04 and 1.05 so you can technically say Fant was 1.04.
In this format I would strongly consider them as the top 2 picks. 2TE plus a major premium makes TE extremely valuable, depending on the other league rules.

User avatar
wickerkat1212
Role Player
Role Player
Posts: 346
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2019 9:23 am
Contact:

Re: Hock & Fant Relative Rookie ADP

Postby wickerkat1212 » Mon Jun 03, 2019 4:29 pm

Fant 1.04
Hock 1.07

That's the earliest I've seen Fant go. 12-man, 1 ppr league. We start qb-rb-rb-rb-wr-wr-wr-wr-te-flex-k-d.

GREAT THREAD.
D3:
QB—Roethlisberger, Mariota, Allen, Tannehill, Rudolph
RB—EE, Cohen, Henry, EMcGuire, JSamuels, Pollard, Adams
WR—MThomas, Diggs, Harry, Hardman, Zay. Amendola, Meredith, Chark
TE—Burton, Doyle, Knox, Jonnu, Shaheen
PK—Zuerlain
DEF—Ravens

D4:
QB—Watson, Winston, Fitzpatrick, Rudolph
RB—Conner, Cohen, Howard, DWilliams, JSamuels, Snell, CEdmonds, JJackson
WR—Hill, Allen, Golladay, Jeffery, Amendola, Miller, CWilliams, Cain, Cobbs
TE—Olsen, IThomas, Gesicki, McDonald
PK—Gostkowski
DEF—Rams, Jags

User avatar
ArrylT
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6966
Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2015 9:32 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Hock & Fant Relative Rookie ADP

Postby ArrylT » Mon Jun 03, 2019 5:36 pm

MattDeezy wrote:
Mon Jun 03, 2019 11:06 am
In a 2TE SF league, Hock was taken at 1.03 and I took Fant at 1.04. The Hock owner then offered me his Hock for my Fant straight up which I accepted.
Did he have a reason? Did he accidentally choose Hockenson when he meant to draft Fant? Not that I have any issue with that - just never seen a guy get drafted then traded immediately for the next guy who got drafted. :eh:
Please speak to clarion contrarion before considering the use of vetos..

XclickX
Practice Squad
Practice Squad
Posts: 228
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2018 4:11 pm

Re: Hock & Fant Relative Rookie ADP

Postby XclickX » Mon Jun 03, 2019 6:17 pm

bjd5211 wrote:
Mon Jun 03, 2019 4:25 pm
XclickX wrote:
Mon Jun 03, 2019 3:21 pm
12 team start 2 TE, TE also receives double the points per reception.

Hock 1.02
Fant 1.05
*I owned both the 1.04 and 1.05 so you can technically say Fant was 1.04.
In this format I would strongly consider them as the top 2 picks. 2TE plus a major premium makes TE extremely valuable, depending on the other league rules.
Agreed they should have went 1-2. I was stoked 1 of the 2 was on the board at pick 4. The rest of the league rules are normal. Only the premium for the TE.

Kcarr
Starter
Starter
Posts: 721
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2015 6:43 am

Re: Hock & Fant Relative Rookie ADP

Postby Kcarr » Mon Jun 03, 2019 6:44 pm

I have seen hock at 7, fant at 9
Fant at 8, hock at 9
And fant at 8, hock at 12

First 2 are 14 teams, last is 16 team contract league where kelce outscored all wrs both total and per game and ertz was 2nd. In total little was 4th and ebron 13th among wrs and tes combined
4th and long: ppr, 10 team, qb, rb, rb, wr, wr, wr, flex, flex, te, k, dl, dl, lb, lb, db, db, dflex, dflex

QB: Kirk Cousins Tyrod Taylor, Jared Goff
RB: Melvin Gordon, Ezekiel Elliot, Theo Riddick, D'Onta Foreman, James Conner, Jamal Williams
WR: Alshon Jeffrey, Amari Cooper, Sammy Watkins, Keenan Allen, Jordan Matthews, Cole Beasley, Robby Anderson, Corey Davis, Breshad Perriman, Eli Rogers
TE: Eric Ebron, , David Njoku, Jack Doyle
K: Will Lutz
DL: Frank Clark, Danielle Hunter
LB: Luke Kuechley, Bobby Wagner, Jordan Hicks, Mark Barron, Darron Lee
DB: Sean Davis, Morgan Burnett,

IR: Clayton Geathers, Quincy Enunwa, Raekwon McMillan

Online
bjd5211
Pro Bowler
Pro Bowler
Posts: 1352
Joined: Wed May 03, 2017 11:50 am

Re: Hock & Fant Relative Rookie ADP

Postby bjd5211 » Mon Jun 03, 2019 7:10 pm

XclickX wrote:
Mon Jun 03, 2019 6:17 pm
bjd5211 wrote:
Mon Jun 03, 2019 4:25 pm
XclickX wrote:
Mon Jun 03, 2019 3:21 pm
12 team start 2 TE, TE also receives double the points per reception.

Hock 1.02
Fant 1.05
*I owned both the 1.04 and 1.05 so you can technically say Fant was 1.04.
In this format I would strongly consider them as the top 2 picks. 2TE plus a major premium makes TE extremely valuable, depending on the other league rules.
Agreed they should have went 1-2. I was stoked 1 of the 2 was on the board at pick 4. The rest of the league rules are normal. Only the premium for the TE.
1QB? In SF I could see taking Kyler 1.01 still, and 2QB I would definitely take Kyler 1 and probably Haskins 2, then the Iowa TEs 3 and 4. 1QB league though I would take the TEs top 2 for sure.

User avatar
MattDeezy
Role Player
Role Player
Posts: 309
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2018 3:37 pm

Re: Hock & Fant Relative Rookie ADP

Postby MattDeezy » Mon Jun 03, 2019 7:45 pm

ArrylT wrote:
Mon Jun 03, 2019 5:36 pm
MattDeezy wrote:
Mon Jun 03, 2019 11:06 am
In a 2TE SF league, Hock was taken at 1.03 and I took Fant at 1.04. The Hock owner then offered me his Hock for my Fant straight up which I accepted.
Did he have a reason? Did he accidentally choose Hockenson when he meant to draft Fant? Not that I have any issue with that - just never seen a guy get drafted then traded immediately for the next guy who got drafted. :eh:
His reason was because he has Flacco/Lock and wanted to tag the QB/TE combo. I already have a share of Fant so I figured diversifying makes sense as I have them basically evenly ranked. Also scooped up Irv Smith which I’m pretty happy about.
A
12Tm PPR SF TE Prem.
1Q|2R|3W|1T|1SF|2FLX
Q: Mayfield, Cam, Bortles, TeddyB, Brissett
R: Henry, Ingram, Samuels, Martin, BHill
W: MThomas, MVS, EqSB, Samuel, Parker, Stills, DaMoore, Crab, Ateman, Gabriel
T: OJHoward, Gesicki, Shaheen
2019: 2.2
2020: 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 4

B
12Tm PPR TE Prem.
1Q|2R|3W|1T|2FLX
Q: Luck, Cousins, Rudolph
R: DJ, Michel, McCoy, JWilliams, Wilkins
W: OBJ, GTate, Dede, Hamilton, EqSB, Reynolds, DaMoore, Crab, Cain
T: Burton, Rudolph, Fumagalli
2019: 1.11, 2.3, 4.6
2020: 1, 1, 1, 4

C
12Tm PPR SF
1Q|2R|3W|1T|1SF|2FLX|1K|1D
Q: Ryan, Trubisky
R: Kerryon, DFreeman, Hunt, Ekeler, Dixon, Clement
W: OBJ, Adams, Alshon, Samuel, Reynolds, Taywan, Zay
T: Howard, Njoku, Ian Thomas
2019: 3.2, 3.6, 4.2, 4.6

D
10Tm PPR
2Q|2R|3W|2T|3FLX
Q: Luck, Watson, Foles
R: Guice, Henry, Howard, Miller, RoJo, Samuels
W: Landry, Fuller, Shepard, GTate, Humphries, Funchess, DaMoore
T: Ertz, Howard, Gesicki
2019: 1.5, 1.6, 1.8

XclickX
Practice Squad
Practice Squad
Posts: 228
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2018 4:11 pm

Re: Hock & Fant Relative Rookie ADP

Postby XclickX » Mon Jun 03, 2019 9:42 pm

bjd5211 wrote:
Mon Jun 03, 2019 7:10 pm
XclickX wrote:
Mon Jun 03, 2019 6:17 pm
bjd5211 wrote:
Mon Jun 03, 2019 4:25 pm


In this format I would strongly consider them as the top 2 picks. 2TE plus a major premium makes TE extremely valuable, depending on the other league rules.
Agreed they should have went 1-2. I was stoked 1 of the 2 was on the board at pick 4. The rest of the league rules are normal. Only the premium for the TE.
1QB? In SF I could see taking Kyler 1.01 still, and 2QB I would definitely take Kyler 1 and probably Haskins 2, then the Iowa TEs 3 and 4. 1QB league though I would take the TEs top 2 for sure.
1 qb, 2 te , 2 wr , 2 rb and 3 flex.

User avatar
ArrylT
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6966
Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2015 9:32 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Hock & Fant Relative Rookie ADP

Postby ArrylT » Sun Jun 09, 2019 2:30 pm

I am in a league where you're required to start 2 TE (sf/2te) and they went back to back at 1.02 & 1.03.
Please speak to clarion contrarion before considering the use of vetos..

User avatar
MrUbuto
Ring of Fame
Ring of Fame
Posts: 3071
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 10:59 pm
Location: Vancouver, B.C.

Re: Hock & Fant Relative Rookie ADP

Postby MrUbuto » Sun Jun 09, 2019 6:08 pm

How would everyone feel about someone taking BOTH?

I have pick 1.05 and 1.13. It's very plausible i get fant at 13.

Have HH and Olsen as my tight ends now. Have HH hock and fant going forward could be dynamite
QB - DWatson(HOU)RWilson(SEA)Winston(TB)
RB - TGurley(LAR)DJohnson(ARI)NChubb(CLE)DHenry(TEN)
WR - ODB(NYG)AJ Green(CIN)ACooper (DAL)NAgholor(PHI)
TE - GOlsen(CAR)HHenry(SD)
K - Zurlien(LAR)Mcmanus(DEN)
Def - JAGS 49ers
[rookie] CDavis(TEN)ZJones(BUF)ACalloway(CLE)AMiller(CHI)
Rosters must always be 3qbs 4wrs 4rbs 2tes 2kickers 2dst and protected players dont take up a roster spot, but are only for rookie/2nd year players that were drafted

User avatar
Hottoddies
All Pro
All Pro
Posts: 1625
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 5:29 pm

Re: Hock & Fant Relative Rookie ADP

Postby Hottoddies » Sun Jun 09, 2019 6:47 pm

MrUbuto wrote:
Sun Jun 09, 2019 6:08 pm
How would everyone feel about someone taking BOTH?

I have pick 1.05 and 1.13. It's very plausible i get fant at 13.

Have HH and Olsen as my tight ends now. Have HH hock and fant going forward could be dynamite
Taking Hockenson at 1.05 might be a bit early.

User avatar
snaps06
Starter
Starter
Posts: 559
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2017 9:08 pm

Re: Hock & Fant Relative Rookie ADP

Postby snaps06 » Sun Jun 09, 2019 6:50 pm

They went back-to-back in my 14 team superflex rookie draft. Hock went 1.11, and I traded up and took Fant at 1.12.
Team 1: 12-Team 0.5 PPR '16 and '17 3rd Place
REBUILDING 2019
QB RB RB WR WR TE Flex Flex Flex
Stafford,Rosen
Duke,CJA,Bernard,M. Brown,Rod Smith
Cooper,Juju,Godwin,Kirk,Washington,DaMoore,Doctson
Ebron,Henry,McDonald
2019 Picks: 1.6, 1.8, 2.3, 2.9, 2.13, 3, 4, 5
2020 picks: 1,1,1,2,2,2,2,3,3,3,4

Team 2: 12-Team 0.5 PPR '17 2nd Place
QB RB RB WR WR TE Flex Flex
Rodgers,Rivers,Stafford
Conner,Zeke,Bell,Hyde,Duke,Breida
Hopkins,Thomas,Cooks,Watkins,M. Williams
Kittle,Henry,Ebron
2019 Picks: 2.8
2020 Picks: 2,3

Team 3: 14-Team SF,Full PPR,0.25/rush '18 3rd Place
QB RB RB WR WR TE Flex Flex Flex SFlex
Luck,Cousins,Kyler,Hoyer
Zeke,LMurray,Ingram,Crowell,Yeldon,Smith
Evans,DJMoore,Watkins,Boyd,Doctson
Fant,McDonald,Shaheen

Team 4: 16-Team, 6 pt all TD, 1 PPR
QB RB RB WR WR TE FLEX FLEX
Luck,Stafford,Mariota
KJ,Jacobs,RFreeman,LMurray,DThompson,Mattison
DJMoore,Watkins,Lockett,Isabella,Washington,Ross, Doctson,Miller
Howard,Herndon
2020 Picks:1,1,1,3,3,4,4

User avatar
MrUbuto
Ring of Fame
Ring of Fame
Posts: 3071
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 10:59 pm
Location: Vancouver, B.C.

Re: Hock & Fant Relative Rookie ADP

Postby MrUbuto » Sun Jun 09, 2019 7:52 pm

Hottoddies wrote:
Sun Jun 09, 2019 6:47 pm
MrUbuto wrote:
Sun Jun 09, 2019 6:08 pm
How would everyone feel about someone taking BOTH?

I have pick 1.05 and 1.13. It's very plausible i get fant at 13.

Have HH and Olsen as my tight ends now. Have HH hock and fant going forward could be dynamite
Taking Hockenson at 1.05 might be a bit early.
Who would you take instead? For me the top 4 is pretty defined. Mont Jacob's Sanders and harry. Than we're in tier 2 and I see hock as potentially generational talent. I'd rather have him over deebo Campbell dk etc
QB - DWatson(HOU)RWilson(SEA)Winston(TB)
RB - TGurley(LAR)DJohnson(ARI)NChubb(CLE)DHenry(TEN)
WR - ODB(NYG)AJ Green(CIN)ACooper (DAL)NAgholor(PHI)
TE - GOlsen(CAR)HHenry(SD)
K - Zurlien(LAR)Mcmanus(DEN)
Def - JAGS 49ers
[rookie] CDavis(TEN)ZJones(BUF)ACalloway(CLE)AMiller(CHI)
Rosters must always be 3qbs 4wrs 4rbs 2tes 2kickers 2dst and protected players dont take up a roster spot, but are only for rookie/2nd year players that were drafted


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bjd5211, Phaded and 8 guests