Hock & Fant Relative Rookie ADP

[Johnny Canuck]

Hock @ 1.10 - Fant @ 2.04

[_yeti]

Ironically I just realized Kittle came from the same school as Hockenson & Fant, so his success may have subconsciously influenced the rise of the other 2.

Don't forget Dallas Clark. The Hawkeyes have produced a lot of good TEs. I think the ability to feature the position and send TEs up to the pros leads to better recruiting and then the better recruiting coupled with the system leads to more prospects finding NFL success, so the two kind of reinforce each other.

Kittle also played with them and said this on ESPN during the draft, so he had a direct influence on them too... sure he helped em out as freshman here and there

"One week into fall camp my senior year, I literally said out loud 'I am so happy I'm graduating because both those guys would have taken my spot,'" Kittle said.

[themburns]

-1.3 (Fant), 1.6 (Hock, my pick) 2 PPR TE
-1.10 (Fant), 1.12 (Hock, my pick)
-1.7 (Fant), 1.9 (Hock)
-1.9 (Hock), 2.2 (Fant)

[ArrylT]

Ironically I just realized Kittle came from the same school as Hockenson & Fant, so his success may have subconsciously influenced the rise of the other 2.

Don't forget Dallas Clark. The Hawkeyes have produced a lot of good TEs. I think the ability to feature the position and send TEs up to the pros leads to better recruiting and then the better recruiting coupled with the system leads to more prospects finding NFL success, so the two kind of reinforce each other.

Very true!

[MEuRaH]

In a TE Premium, Hock went 1.03 and Fant went 1.06.

In my 96 team league (www.Dynasty96.com), Hock and Fant went overall as follows (vets are in the draft too):

Hock:
63
64
65
66
67
70
(All Above = 1.11 to 1.12)

Fant:
87
104
105
109
112
117
(All Above = 2.03 to 2.08)

[DJB]

I view Hockenson as the safer pick but Fant appears to have more fantasy upside

[skinfanjon]

In a TE Premium, Hock went 1.03 and Fant went 1.06.

In my 96 team league (www.Dynasty96.com), Hock and Fant went overall as follows (vets are in the draft too):

Hock:
63
64
65
66
67
70
(All Above = 1.11 to 1.12)

Fant:
87
104
105
109
112
117
(All Above = 2.03 to 2.08)

Hmmmm...I'm in an FFPC league ($500 #3) where I took Hock 1.03 and Fant went 1.06. You in that league by chance?

[Ruggenater]

I've had 3 drafts so far.

12 team superflex: Hockenson 9, Fant 11
10 team IDP: Hockenson 6, Fant 10
10 team IDP: Hockenson 8, Fant 19

That's pick differences of 2, 4, and 11. I selected 4+ as the "average" for the poll.

[IBall2]

I was hoping one would gall to pick #11 for me in our rookie draft 1QB/1TE league and they went 1.05 and 1.07! I was very surprised so I ended up taking Irv Smith at 2.09 and was very happy with that instead of paying up in the early 1st round.

[UnsafeAtAnySpd]

Few of my drafts...

12 team: 1.07 Hock, 2.02 Fant
14 team superflex: 1.09 Hock, 1.11 Fant
32 team superflex (2 copy): 1.16/1.18 Hock, 1.17/1.25 Fant
32 team IDP (2 copy): 1.09/1.21 Fant, 1.14/1.18 Hock

[Jigga94]

Fant went 7. Hock still on the board at 11

[MattDeezy]

In a 2TE SF league, Hock was taken at 1.03 and I took Fant at 1.04. The Hock owner then offered me his Hock for my Fant straight up which I accepted.

[motherlode]

12 team 1 QB 0.5 PPR no TE premium.

1.09 Fant

2.02 Hockenson

[Jigga94]

In a 2TE SF league, Hock was taken at 1.03 and I took Fant at 1.04. The Hock owner then offered me his Hock for my Fant straight up which I accepted.

Lol reminds me of when I took Baker right after Darnold. I offered Baker and a throw in for Darnold and they declined... Come mid season they offered me Darnold for Baker straight up.. No thanks

[Jigga94]

Fant went 7. Hock still on the board at 11

Hock was still there at 15 so I traded 20 and 28 to move up and get him.