Trade down from 1.01, what do you expect to get in picks

[Cult of Dionysus]

Just saw 1.02 go for 1.10 + 1.14. Obviously a big difference between 1.01 and 1.02, but I think that was more than fair value for 1.02. I'd rather have 1.10 and 1.14 myself.

I hold 1.01 in this league. I'd probably do 1.02 and 1.10. If it were any piece other than 1.02, I'd need more.

[Wizard]

My thoughts were a top 4 pick and a 2020 1st or a few high 2019 2nds and a 2020 1st.

[Friction]

Traded 1.01 for 1.04 +2020 1st. 1qb league, low starting requirements.

Good trade for both sides.

He was a non-playoff team and is definitely a bottom third team (on paper) coming into the year, even with Jacobs. The fact it may end up as a top 6 or better 2020 1st helped. That, and I have Jacobs on 2 teams already, so wanted to diversify a little.

[John Paul]

I use this as a jumping off point: https://www.fantasypros.com/2019/03/fan ... 19-update/

[PPE82]

I gave 1.05 + 1.11 in a pretty standard 12 team ppr

[joeya2001]

I expect all the picks!

[sloth8u]

Just saw 1.02 go for 1.10 + 1.14. Obviously a big difference between 1.01 and 1.02, but I think that was more than fair value for 1.02. I'd rather have 1.10 and 1.14 myself.

I hold 1.01 in this league. I'd probably do 1.02 and 1.10. If it were any piece other than 1.02, I'd need more.

Interestingly enough...the 1.2 is actually ranked as the better dynasty asset on this very site. In terms of adp, jacobs does carry the better adp but only by a few spots.

From what i saw in the early drafts, owners are content in the top 4 with jacobs, monty, sanders, or harry. Dk has went 5 in all or nearly all my drafts but there isinterest in moving up for a rb.

In reguards to some of what im seeing in this thread.....some of this is ridiculous imo and isnt really an "expected return", but rather, a leaguemate getting taken to the cleaners in a bad trade.

Not sure there is anyone carrying an adp within a handful of spots before or after jacobs that many of us are paying multiple decent picks for...yet some are suggesting the unproven rookie should net that.

The 1.1 this year is carrying an adp around 35. Not 5, 10, 15. 20, or even 25. I get the idea of rookie fever and all that good stuff, but i wouldnt expect your leaguemates to pay top 15-20 prices for a guy that isnt being drafted there or even ranked as the top rookie on the site we subscribe to.

[Oddball456]

Just saw 1.02 go for 1.10 + 1.14. Obviously a big difference between 1.01 and 1.02, but I think that was more than fair value for 1.02. I'd rather have 1.10 and 1.14 myself.

I hold 1.01 in this league. I'd probably do 1.02 and 1.10. If it were any piece other than 1.02, I'd need more.

Interestingly enough...the 1.2 is actually ranked as the better dynasty asset on this very site. In terms of adp, jacobs does carry the better adp but only by a few spots.

From what i saw in the early drafts, owners are content in the top 4 with jacobs, monty, sanders, or harry. Dk has went 5 in all or nearly all my drafts but there isinterest in moving up for a rb.

In reguards to some of what im seeing in this thread.....some of this is ridiculous imo and isnt really an "expected return", but rather, a leaguemate getting taken to the cleaners in a bad trade.

Not sure there is anyone carrying an adp within a handful of spots before or after jacobs that many of us are paying multiple decent picks for...yet some are suggesting the unproven rookie should net that.

The 1.1 this year is carrying an adp around 35. Not 5, 10, 15. 20, or even 25. I get the idea of rookie fever and all that good stuff, but i wouldnt expect your leaguemates to pay top 15-20 prices for a guy that isnt being drafted there or even ranked as the top rookie on the site we subscribe to.

Yeah, every year the difference between the 1.01 and other early first round picks changes depending on that years crop of players and where the drop-offs are at.

Last year with Barkley the 1.01 was worth a TON more than the 1.02. This year the 1.01 to 1.04 are all basically the same value because so many players could be taken in that range. I have the 1.04 and will take any of Sanders, Jacobs, Harry, or Bosa (IDP) that falls to me and I don't really care which as my team doesn't have a major hole anywhere. So I am not interested in moving up at all.

[Patsfan86]

I traded 1.01 for 1.03, 2.04, a 2020 2nd and a 2019 3rd. I thought it was a good deal.