Re: More 2020 Hype: "If You Need A RB or WR, this is the draft for you."
Posted: Sun Dec 01, 2019 10:03 am
https://forum.dynastyleaguefootball.com/
https://forum.dynastyleaguefootball.com/viewtopic.php?t=182388
He was invited and like you said it'll depend on his health. I like him as a big bodied WR like a Mike Evans/Dez Bryant but that means he most likely can be had a discount since his measurables won't be through the roof.DynoScout wrote: ↑Sun Dec 01, 2019 9:12 am Bryan Edwards has been on the shelf since early November and I sense some "out of sight/out of mind" happening with him right now. I like him, and he might not be a top 24 rookie pick right now in a fair percentage of leagues.
Any one else tuned in on Edwards? I assume we won't see him until the Senior Bowl at this point. (I assume he's been invited and health permitting will attend.)
This is still a stronger QB class than most years, it's better than last year and 2016 and likely better than 2017 when you consider how relatively low Watson/Mahomes were regarded coming out compared to the top QBs most years. It's even on par potentially with 2018 and has 5 guys that could be 1st rounders this year (Burrow, Tua, Herbert, Fromm, Eason) plus Hurts could potentially sneak in if some team thinks they can make him into Lamar 2.0 but he's probably going day 2.djeternal2 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 01, 2019 6:27 am
I didn't specifically name Burrow but I thought my comment in bold was understood that the top 2 were Tua & Burrow. Also didn't realize Fields isn't eligible for 20 which weakens the QB class even more.
As for the TEs none of the guys in 20 are even close as prospects to the guys you mentioned (Hooper, Henry, etc). Maybe one will develop 3 years from now but I doubt any TEs get taken in the first 2 rounds of rookie drafts this year.
As a Colorado alum, I've watched every game Laviska has played for CU. I'm probably biased, but Laviska is a beast. He's a totally different player from Sammy Watkins. He's bigger than Sammy and is a shade slower, (6'2, 225 lbs for Shenault, 6'1, 211 for Watkins). I've seen experts compare him to JuJu Smith-Schuster and Anquan Bolden. He's almost got a RB-type build, and he plays like it. He even lines up in the wild-cat for us. It almost always takes more than one guy to tackle him. He's got unbelievably strong hands, makes contested catches, and is extremely elusive in open space. He doesn't quite have the elite skillset of size, speed, and route running of a Jerry Jeudy, but depending of who drafts him, I could definitely see him being a monster in the NFL. If you don't believe me, haven't seen him much, or just enjoy watching him play, check out his game against Nebraska last season:
To my eye, Shenault looks a lot faster, and moves much better laterally than Harry did/doesLord_Varys wrote: ↑Tue Dec 03, 2019 2:19 pm Might be out on a limb, but I don't like Laviska as a pro prospect. He reminds me of N'Keal Harry -- good at contested catches, uber explosive and great after the catch, but doesn't show nearly enough as a route runner creating separation for me to feel comfortable with his pro prospects. I prefer WRs who win on separation in the NFL.
I don't think anyone will be more controversial than Reagor...alewilliam789 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 03, 2019 6:42 pm I think Shenault and Eteinne are going to be the most controversial prospects because their projections could have them being top tier players in the right situation to possible back-ups/gadget roles.
If Shenault is smart he should tell teams he’s just an athlete willing to participate in all the offensive skill position drills (TE, WR, RB). I truly believe that Shenault will be more successful in the NFL being used as part TE, part Wildcat RB, and part WR than solely being any one of those positions.
He’s has had such a bad year ... I surprised that he declared for the draft.nathanq42 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 03, 2019 7:47 pmI don't think anyone will be more controversial than Reagor...alewilliam789 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 03, 2019 6:42 pm I think Shenault and Eteinne are going to be the most controversial prospects because their projections could have them being top tier players in the right situation to possible back-ups/gadget roles.
If Shenault is smart he should tell teams he’s just an athlete willing to participate in all the offensive skill position drills (TE, WR, RB). I truly believe that Shenault will be more successful in the NFL being used as part TE, part Wildcat RB, and part WR than solely being any one of those positions.
I agree shenault should say he is willing to fill any roll they think he will fit into