How Would You To Resolve A Dispute With 2+ Interpretations?

General talk about Dynasty Leagues.

Were My Actions Correct?

Yes. What You Did Was Fair.
1
25%
No. You Should Have Reset All Applicable Bids, And Implemented To The 2nd Interpretation.
2
50%
No. You Should Have Reset All Applicable Bids, But Still Implemented To Your Interpretation.
1
25%
No. Don't Reset Any Bids, But Implement To The 2nd Interpretation.
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 4

User avatar
_yeti
Pro Bowler
Pro Bowler
Posts: 1476
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:21 am

Re: How Would You To Resolve A Dispute With 2+ Interpretations?

Postby _yeti » Sun Sep 09, 2018 2:06 pm

Turcoroxx? Is that you? Was the rule as vague as this post?
Remember where you are - this is Thunderdome.
*4 leagues (Sig est. '15, others '17, '18, '18, 2 total 'ships)

12 Team 1/2 PPR - TE Prem., IDP *2018 Champion* 1QB, 2RB, 3WR, 1TE, 2Flex, 2DL, 2LB, 2DB, 1 IDPflex
QB: R. Wilson, B. Roethlisberger, T. Tagovailoa, M. Trubisky, N. Foles
RB: E. Elliot, J. Taylor, T. Gurley, C. Carson, Z. Moss, M. Mack, T. Pollard
WR: M. Evans, K. Allen, A. Cooper, C. Lamb, T. Higgins, J. Landry, Antonio Brown, C. Davis, J. Ross, J. Gordon
TE: N. Fant, E. Ebron, D. Njoku, T. Burton
DL: D. Hunter, N. Bosa, D. Buckner, C. Jones
LB: B. Wagner, CJ Mosley, J. Collins, S. Thompson
DB: L. Collins, T. Mathieu J. Chinn

bjd5211
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame
Posts: 4954
Joined: Wed May 03, 2017 11:50 am

Re: How Would You To Resolve A Dispute With 2+ Interpretations?

Postby bjd5211 » Sun Sep 09, 2018 3:41 pm

No clue, you need to tell us the rule.

Cameron Giles
GOAT
GOAT
Posts: 10501
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2014 6:06 pm

Re: How Would You To Resolve A Dispute With 2+ Interpretations?

Postby Cameron Giles » Sun Sep 09, 2018 3:44 pm

If you're the commissioner, then it's up to you no matter how dumb the rule is.

Ray Finkle
Pro Bowler
Pro Bowler
Posts: 1004
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2014 8:05 am

Re: How Would You To Resolve A Dispute With 2+ Interpretations?

Postby Ray Finkle » Sun Sep 09, 2018 5:01 pm

I’ll bet my next week’s paycheck that this is turcorox’s burner account.

User avatar
Orenthal Shames
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame
Posts: 4910
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:13 pm

Re: How Would You To Resolve A Dispute With 2+ Interpretations?

Postby Orenthal Shames » Sun Sep 09, 2018 6:40 pm

Purge everyone. Dissolve the league
16 team league
1 QB, 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 2 Flex (RB/WR/TE)
26 man rosters - full point ppr
2015, 17, 18, 19, 20 Champs

QB: Tannehill, Brees
RB: Kamara, Sanders
WR: Hill, DK, KA, Julio, Cooks
TE: Kelce, Kittle

User avatar
Valhalla
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame
Posts: 4515
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2013 4:26 pm

Re: How Would You To Resolve A Dispute With 2+ Interpretations?

Postby Valhalla » Sun Sep 09, 2018 6:56 pm

Clear case. Implement emergency action rule #7.

User avatar
Mefisto
Pro Bowler
Pro Bowler
Posts: 1332
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 8:18 am

Re: How Would You To Resolve A Dispute With 2+ Interpretations?

Postby Mefisto » Sun Sep 09, 2018 7:02 pm

...what's the rule?
12 Team Non-PPR league. 2QB, 2RB, 3WR, 1RB/WR, 1TE, 1K, 1DL, 1LB, 1DB, 2DL/LB/DB
QB: Brady, Stafford, Mariota, Tannehill
RB: L. Miller, A. Collins, K. Drake, R. Freeman, K. Dixon, D. Foreman, D. Murray, J. Allen, Gore
WR: Hopkins, ARob, S. Diggs, D. Parker, M. Lee, J. Matthews, T. Lockett, D. Pettis, Callaway
TE: T. Kelce, E. Ebron, C. Brate
K: Bailey, Coons, Boswell
DL: D. Hunter, R. Quinn, D. Lawrence
LB: Von Miller, A. Ogletree, B. Wagner T. Edmunds
DB: H. Smith, J. Cyprien, L. Collins
2017 Superbowl Champion

10 Team PPR League. Start QB, 2RB, 2WR, TE, 1Superflex, 1Flex, 2DL, 2LB, 2DB, 3DFlex
QB: Luck, Goff, Trubisky, Prescott, Tannehill
RB: Gurley, Mixon, Barkley, D. Foreman
WR: Kupp, Cooper, C. Davis, Parker, T. Lockett, Kupp, W. Fuller, Sutton, John Brown, Callaway
TE: Kelce, Burton
DL: D. Lawrence, Ogunjobi, Ansah, M. Davenport
LB: L. Kuechly, T. Smith, Kiko Alonso, T. Edmunds, J. Smith, R. Foster
DB: Clinton-Dix, D. James, T. Edmunds, M. Jenkins

User avatar
saw061600
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6117
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2014 8:58 pm

Re: How Would You To Resolve A Dispute With 2+ Interpretations?

Postby saw061600 » Sun Sep 09, 2018 7:26 pm

This is absolutely the dumbest post ever on the forum.
You didn't tell us the rule.
You didn't tell us the interpretation.
You didn't tell us how your decision followed the rule; probably because you didn't tell us the rule.
10 TM No PPR or waiver 85RST
Herbert JimmyG Dalton Winston
Barkley Chubb JT RoJo Sony Bell
Evans ARob Aiyuk Dionte Jeudy Boyd OBJ GDavis MWill
Kelce Andrews Jonnu Hooper
Watt Williams Richardson Taylor Graham
Kendricks DCampbell DJones Baker Kiser Brooks
Adams Simmons Vaccaro Joseph

12 TM .5ppr 45 RST
Dak Herbert
JT JRob Mixon Carson Henderson Penny DEvans Duke
DK Godwin ARob Boyd Cooks Thielen Shepard BEdwards DGabriel
Kelce Tonyan
Hunter Barnett Clark Crosby G-Matur
Kendricks Warner Perryman Milano Campbell Baker Jack
Budda Neal Clark Karl

1-2QB 2-4RB 3-4WR 1-3TE
QB Herbert Murray Stafford
RB Taylor Jacobs Gaskin Hines Penny Mack Hill Peterson
WR Ridley Jefferson Golladay JuJu Diggs Reagor Chark Boyd
TE Kittle Kelce AOk
DL Gholston Fowler Barnett Lawson Hall Kinlaw
LB Queen Thompson Jewell Nwosu Kwon Kyzir
DB Peppers Fitz Clark Sorensen KJoseph

User avatar
BlackOmega
Pro Bowler
Pro Bowler
Posts: 1461
Joined: Tue May 01, 2012 5:11 pm

Re: How Would You To Resolve A Dispute With 2+ Interpretations?

Postby BlackOmega » Sun Sep 09, 2018 7:29 pm

I chose the 4th interpretation as it made the most sense to me

User avatar
_yeti
Pro Bowler
Pro Bowler
Posts: 1476
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:21 am

Re: How Would You To Resolve A Dispute With 2+ Interpretations?

Postby _yeti » Sun Sep 09, 2018 7:48 pm

Ray Finkle wrote:
Sun Sep 09, 2018 5:01 pm
I’ll bet my next week’s paycheck that this is turcorox’s burner account.
Long vague story: check
Multi option poll: check
Commissioner involved and rule interpretation required: check.
Is a profile that has not commented on threads relating to football players: check.
Profile with only five posts and the other thread he is in he also created and is a commissioner/tanking thread: check.
Other thread he created has multi option poll: check.

Verdict: turcorox is now trolling us from at least two accounts.
Remember where you are - this is Thunderdome.
*4 leagues (Sig est. '15, others '17, '18, '18, 2 total 'ships)

12 Team 1/2 PPR - TE Prem., IDP *2018 Champion* 1QB, 2RB, 3WR, 1TE, 2Flex, 2DL, 2LB, 2DB, 1 IDPflex
QB: R. Wilson, B. Roethlisberger, T. Tagovailoa, M. Trubisky, N. Foles
RB: E. Elliot, J. Taylor, T. Gurley, C. Carson, Z. Moss, M. Mack, T. Pollard
WR: M. Evans, K. Allen, A. Cooper, C. Lamb, T. Higgins, J. Landry, Antonio Brown, C. Davis, J. Ross, J. Gordon
TE: N. Fant, E. Ebron, D. Njoku, T. Burton
DL: D. Hunter, N. Bosa, D. Buckner, C. Jones
LB: B. Wagner, CJ Mosley, J. Collins, S. Thompson
DB: L. Collins, T. Mathieu J. Chinn

User avatar
slaughterrt
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame
Posts: 4127
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 5:11 pm

Re: How Would You To Resolve A Dispute With 2+ Interpretations?

Postby slaughterrt » Mon Sep 10, 2018 6:49 am

I read that post probably 4 times thinking I kept overlooking the critical missing information. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool be two, three, or four times, then shame on me.

CK_
Role Player
Role Player
Posts: 354
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2016 9:20 pm

Re: How Would You To Resolve A Dispute With 2+ Interpretations?

Postby CK_ » Mon Sep 10, 2018 8:05 am

A interception was thrown which then started the discussion, therefore the person that started the discussion was already ready for a dispute. That person then proceeds to see another interception so said discussion has now become a dispute but if first interception was not thrown then no dispute would be had. So then you must remove the first interception but then if you remove first interception then you must remove second interception but second interception must not be removed so then you must therefore add back in the first interception to then remove the second interception to then solve the dispute of both interceptions so then you must add back both interceptions and VOILA!
14 Team .5 PPR Return yards
QB: Luck, Mayfield
RB: Elliot, Mixon, Guice, Ekeler
WR: Diggs, C. Davis, Gordon, Lockett, M. Williams, Godwin, John Brown, Tre'Quan Smith
TE: Gronk, Burton, Goedert
K: Gostkowski
D/ST: Jax, Chiefs

User avatar
Triton85
Starter
Starter
Posts: 632
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2017 1:13 pm

Re: How Would You To Resolve A Dispute With 2+ Interpretations?

Postby Triton85 » Mon Sep 10, 2018 8:07 am

mind... blown...
I-90 Dynasty - Monstars *2020 Champions*
(10 team, .5PPR, 25 Man Roster, 1QB, 2 RB, 3WR, 1TE, 2Flex, 1Def)
QB: Watson, Herbert
RB: Kamara, Cook, Mixon, Swift, Dillon, DJ, Bell
WR: M Thomas, Godwin, Arob, Aiyuk, Landry, Cooks, Davis
TE: Tonyan, Ertz, Gronkowski
Taxi: Vaughn, Trautman, KJ Hill

Junkies Listener League
(12 team, PPR, TE Prem, 28 Man Roster, 1QB, 2 RB, 3WR, 1TE, 1SF, 2Flex)
QB: Herbert, Wentz, Carr, Trubisky
HR: Elliott, AJ Dillon, Fournette, DJ, McKinnon
WR: Jefferson, Nuk, Diggs, K. Allen, J. Brown, Jeffrey, Pettis, Tate, T. Smith, Hansen, D Jax
Te: Cook, Schultz, Griffin, Arnold, Parkinson, Schultz
IR: Uzomah
Taxi: Gandy-Golden, C. Johnson, J. Reed, J. Proche

User avatar
slaughterrt
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame
Posts: 4127
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 5:11 pm

Re: How Would You To Resolve A Dispute With 2+ Interpretations?

Postby slaughterrt » Mon Sep 10, 2018 8:08 am

CK_ wrote:
Mon Sep 10, 2018 8:05 am
A interception was thrown which then started the discussion, therefore the person that started the discussion was already ready for a dispute. That person then proceeds to see another interception so said discussion has now become a dispute but if first interception was not thrown then no dispute would be had. So then you must remove the first interception but then if you remove first interception then you must remove second interception but second interception must not be removed so then you must therefore add back in the first interception to then remove the second interception to then solve the dispute of both interceptions so then you must add back both interceptions and VOILA!
:clap:

FantasyFreak
GOAT
GOAT
Posts: 17049
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2014 1:03 am

Re: How Would You To Resolve A Dispute With 2+ Interpretations?

Postby FantasyFreak » Mon Sep 10, 2018 8:09 am

_yeti wrote:
Sun Sep 09, 2018 7:48 pm
Ray Finkle wrote:
Sun Sep 09, 2018 5:01 pm
I’ll bet my next week’s paycheck that this is turcorox’s burner account.
Long vague story: check
Multi option poll: check
Commissioner involved and rule interpretation required: check.
Is a profile that has not commented on threads relating to football players: check.
Profile with only five posts and the other thread he is in he also created and is a commissioner/tanking thread: check.
Other thread he created has multi option poll: check.

Verdict: turcorox is now trolling us from at least two accounts.
LOL.


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: dmac37, OhCruelestRanter and 17 guests