Hunter or Edmunds for 2.01?

[mzkp54]

Team 2 in sig.

Have a 2nd round pick that is very likely to be 2.01. Top 3 for sure.

Want to add another IDP starter after losing Martinez to injury. Balanced scoring (Danielle Hunter has scored 21 PPG, Tremaine Edmunds has scored 13 PPG). Have offers for each for the pick. Would you give 2.01 for either?

[Space Cowboy]

Edmunds no. LBs are relatively easy to find. Hunter is worth the pick if you need sack help. He has a tendency to have 3 sack games which can be weekly winners.

[lukkynumber13]

I personally think Hunter is likely the best DE in the league, and he’s still young.

That being said, if you’re only starting 1 DE - you shouldn’t spend a 2nd on any IDP.

[mzkp54]

I personally think Hunter is likely the best DE in the league, and he’s still young.

That being said, if you’re only starting 1 DE - you shouldn’t spend a 2nd on any IDP.

Was only starting 1 because I didn’t have a worthwhile second option. Can start 1-5

[lukkynumber13]

I personally think Hunter is likely the best DE in the league, and he’s still young.

That being said, if you’re only starting 1 DE - you shouldn’t spend a 2nd on any IDP.

Was only starting 1 because I didn’t have a worthwhile second option. Can start 1-5

Ah, ok I see that now - if a DL with a 2 sack game can score alongside top RBs and WRs (as they should) then Hunter is easily worth a 1st

[Kcarr]

If I felt good offensively I wouldn't mind giving a top 2nd for hunter. My real question here is how do lbs match up scoring wise to des? If you are only starting 1 dl and can get similar points from a LB no point in spending on a dl. Wouldn't give more than a high 3rd for Edmunds in 10 teams leagues