CRidley for 1.07/Jaylon Smith

[Skullcrusher]

Would you take this offer?




My Team:

QB: Cousins, Bridgewater, Garrapolo, Lock
RB: Lindsay, Mattison, Peterson, Sanders
WR Start 2-5: AJBrown, MJones, Pettis, Ridley, Samuel
LB start 3-4: Jerome Baker, Matt Judon, Khalil Mack, Fred Warner[/size]

Picks: 1.04, 1.13, 2.04, 3.04, 3.07, 4.04, 5.04

[killer_of_giants]

scoring and settings would help, but given your team i'd probably want a 2nd instead of smith, unless you think you can trade him for more.

[Team Tacos]

I'd take the 1.07 side, even without Jaylon Smith

[Vick2Crumpler87]

Ridley, easily. Not even a question

[TB3falcons]

I’d go Ridley as well, fairly easily. More positional value, very good NFL receiver on a team with a lot of vacated targets. Maybe wait til 1.07 is on the clock in case someone falls, but I can’t see how it’s not Ridley at this point. 1.07 could be Jefferson (who you would hope would turn into Ridley) or Reagor (not a fan personally)

Edit: Jeudy or Lamb could be there at 1.07, I think they’re more talented than Ridley. For some reason didn’t do my internal mock right. Makes it much closer

[henry1jg]

Would you take this offer?




My Team:

QB: Cousins, Bridgewater, Garrapolo, Lock
RB: Lindsay, Mattison, Peterson, Sanders
WR Start 2-5: AJBrown, MJones, Pettis, Ridley, Samuel
LB start 3-4: Jerome Baker, Matt Judon, Khalil Mack, Fred Warner[/size]

Picks: 1.04, 1.13, 2.04, 3.04, 3.07, 4.04, 5.04

I prefer Ridley

[IR1]

Close for me. Consider it on the clock. If scoring is high on idp, Smith could be valuable

[berserkers]

Absolutely Ridley.

[FiremanEd]

Lamb or Jeudy are equal to or better than Ridley for me, so Jaylon tips the scale for the win for me.

[Vick2Crumpler87]

Lamb or Jeudy are equal to or better than Ridley for me, so Jaylon tips the scale for the win for me.

Without playing a snap? I don't think so. Ridley is a stud. Sure, the other 2 could well be studs, but Ridley already is.

[Bronco Billy]

Lamb or Jeudy are equal to or better than Ridley for me, so Jaylon tips the scale for the win for me.

Without playing a snap? I don't think so. Ridley is a stud. Sure, the other 2 could well be studs, but Ridley already is.

Ridley is s stud? I must have slept through that event. Looks pretty much like a protypical FF WR2 to me.

Smith was LB14 in our league. I think I’d roll the dice on he and the 1.07 against a decent but hardly studly WR.

[FiremanEd]

Lamb or Jeudy are equal to or better than Ridley for me, so Jaylon tips the scale for the win for me.

Without playing a snap? I don't think so. Ridley is a stud. Sure, the other 2 could well be studs, but Ridley already is.

When did Ridley become a stud? His production to date doesn’t justify stud status. He’s a solid player and should continue to be, however I prefer both Lamb and Jeudy as prospects and get them 4+ year younger. Ridley’s two respectable seasons don’t change my view that he is what I thought coming out. I’ll roll the dice on these two prospects Being able to provide 60+ catches and sub-900 yard seasons in the next two years and still be younger than when Ridley came out. I Like their ceiling more and also get the benefit of Jaylon Smith, who I like.

If IDP has low starter requirements and scoring, and you want to go conservative, then Ridley makes sense. I just like the pieces on the other side. If we were in the league together we could be trade partners!