Dynasty League Football Forum

Nothing in the top 14 for me. Colts and Bengals and a playoff team trade up are the best options to me. Jets would be intriguing, but if memory serves Rodgers is not a fan of rookies.

tstafford wrote: ↑Sun Apr 14, 2024 3:01 am

SoftwoodGrampian wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2024 8:37 pm Stroud

I almost posted this.

From time to time I wonder if we've pumped too much gas in to Stroud. Would be an "unpopular opinion" for sure.

Considering some people have him as qb1, the answer is undoubtedly yes.

14 Team SF, TE premium Personally this is my favorite format. Really puts an emphasis on team building and QB in particular. Start 1 QB, 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 1 SF, 3 Flex Looks good. I think most of the time you'll want to be starting 4-5 wrs just due to the nature of the RB and TE positions. QB Cousi...

Ok so another update here. It has been a busy afternoon. I just accepted an offer for the 1.01 that I just received from the deal on this thread. I sent 1.01 and received CMC and 1.04. I feel like i just cheated the system... I basically just traded Kenneth Walker and the 1.05 for CMC and the 1.04....

kellysheroes wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2024 2:23 pm Damm dude, your RBs are trash now

Trash rbs win championships. There are always cheap bets that put up good numbers

Not that anyone cares, but I disappeared for about a year and a half on the forums, but I am happy to announce (insert Cam Newton voice): “IM BAAAAACCCKKK” Much like my controversial Kyle Pitts thread on why you shouldn’t have drafted him with your premium rookie pick a few years back, I have anoth...

bridger32 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2024 1:21 pm Update on this - We just completed the trade. I got 1.01. He got Walker and 1.05.

Well then I guess go Williams and then see if you can get some vet rbs like mostert, Conner, kamara, etc etc later in the off season

Haven't looked at the other responses, but I'd rather keep the 1.05 and walker in a SF if I was a contender. If in a rebuild I'd be okay taking the 1.01 and going Williams but I'd rather get a little more on top. Honestly I'm not sure there really is a huge difference from 1.01 to 1.05/1.06. the top...

Not that anyone cares, but I disappeared for about a year and a half on the forums, but I am happy to announce (insert Cam Newton voice): “IM BAAAAACCCKKK” Much like my controversial Kyle Pitts thread on why you shouldn’t have drafted him with your premium rookie pick a few years back, I have anoth...

First offer, maybe to the right team.

Mid season last year I sent Geno for a 25 1st to a contender who needed a QB in a 14 team SF.

Second offer looks good to me. I'd send two thirds for one of them in a 12 team SF

Right now I'll take Wilson, post NFL draft I could see myself taking Nabers

Only surprising thing here is McCarthy at 5. I wouldn't take him before 7 at this point. Could change post NFL draft of a team (looking at you vikings) moves up to take him. I think Bowers at 8 is the right spot for now. Again he needs a good landing spot to really justify going before McCarthy for ...

Late to the party but I love this type of topic. A bunch will likely change post draft but I think the following are buys depending on cost: Category 1: confident that draft won't change this: Kamara Mostert (could be category 3 see below) Charbs Category 2: team will likely add a RB in the draft th...

I would have accepted original option. What do you think the difference is in player between 1.14 and 2.03?

Jsn and dell for me.