Dynasty League Football Forum

Picks. There's no upside to the player side, this is max value.

Tough call.

Swift + 1.04 >= JT
1.06 + 1.11 >= Evans
Boyd and 1 '22 2nd are pretty = to 1.09 I'd say

Brown + Drake + '22 2nd is probably worth another late first to help bridge the gap.

I think I'd probably take the pick side and hope to get lucky.

The idea that being useless as a blocker is somehow a good thing because it means the TE will be deployed more as a pass catcher only works if the team has no other options at TE, or if you're clearly one of your team's 3 best pass catchers. Being on the field matters. I don't think any of this app...

If we use the Dallas games and mckissick against Gibson then isn't the current adp rb2 being overvalued as well? Taylor has 1/3 of his yards in a game against LV and JAX two trash run Ds and Hynes finished in a similar proportion as mckissick from a per game perspective. No one is holding these two...

The any TE, blocking is a big deal IMO. Jimmy Graham was a legitimate liability as a blocker and it didn't matter. Pitts is a willing blocker, he just isn't asked to do it much or been coached much on it because he is just so good as a receiver. His presence on the field is enough to help in the ru...

Pitts has higher upside as a potential WR1 labeled as a TE, but I think Chase is more likely to hit.

Chase will hold more value for a while unless Pitts blows up quick, so I’d probably go him if you just want value.

Do we think any major competition gets brought in for him via the draft? Or is he all set? There’s only two backs in this class that would constitute major competition, in my opinion, and they’ll both be gone before the Redskins third round pick. This means they’d either have to use a first or seco...

Gibson feels super overrated to me right now. I’m not sure what I’m missing here? I mean he looked OK, but I wouldn’t call him special or anything. He had one very good game vs the cowboys and was generally adequate the rest of the way. Feels like maybe some back clapping by those who drafted him. ...

briank wrote: ↑Wed Mar 31, 2021 8:44 pm For the people here that think it’s weird, or are questioning him not running a 40, he hasn’t fully recovered from an ankle injury.

That sounds like something someone who wouldn't want to run the 40 would say lol.

First one is easy decline.

Second one I might do if Chase is there at 1.04. If he’s not than I’d pass on that too.

Samuel Davis Mims Pittman for me. I would have Pittman #1 if he had nearly any other QB than Wentz, but unfortunately Wentz is probably the last QB you want throwing to your WR. In all 5 years he has never even had a 900 yard WR. I feel pretty confident Fitzpatrick can feed Samuel and not as confide...

mgscott wrote: ↑Fri Mar 26, 2021 11:15 am Any chance SF thinks the 1.3 will have more value on draft night and thinks they can get more for it later? I know it's not likely and would be a risk, but you never know.

No. The 49ers are running a football team, not day trading the draft pick stock market.

https://twitter.com/Eagles/status/13755 ... 42311?s=19

Tua not safe yet.

It will be nice to see the "Shanahan run first offense" meme die now that he will have a QB that he actually believes can throw.

I'd take the pick, Watson is done.