Dynasty League Football Forum

Early voting not going how I anticipated. Thought most would say Montgomery 2023, and Swift 2024. Long ways to go That was my vote, but mostly because I expect Swift to be somewhere else in 2024 and for that place to actually want to use him. I believe Swift is more talented than Montgomery, and gi...

moishetreats wrote: ↑Thu Mar 16, 2023 6:20 pm And there is, IMO, a huge gap in favor of Monty over Doubs. So even if you think that Barkley will outproduce Kupp, Monty more than makes up for it for me.

^this

Early voting not going how I anticipated. Thought most would say Montgomery 2023, and Swift 2024. Long ways to go That was my vote, but mostly because I expect Swift to be somewhere else in 2024 and for that place to actually want to use him. I believe Swift is more talented than Montgomery, and gi...

Let Baker Bake?

The White side holds the greater vacuum value, but I'd prefer the Pickens side personally in most situations. ^This sentence right here Including my situation? Elite at the top, no depth Yes, even with your situation. I don't think this does much from a depth consideration, but likely improves your...

Prison_Mike wrote: ↑Tue Mar 14, 2023 2:01 pm Pickens blew you away in 2022? I’m intrigued, say more

For me at least, it wasn't his production but just how GOOD he looked out there. My love of Pickens is purely eye test, and the highlight reel plays he made look routine.

Eight7Seven wrote: ↑Tue Mar 14, 2023 1:58 pm The White side holds the greater vacuum value, but I'd prefer the Pickens side personally in most situations.

^This sentence right here

Valhalla wrote: ↑Tue Mar 14, 2023 1:51 pm

YouMightDieTryin wrote: ↑Tue Mar 14, 2023 1:26 pm When the f#%$ did we get ice cream?!

I'm curious what reference I missed

Same, man. Same.

IDK how BAL's new OC will use their RBs, but I'd imagine Dobbins will have at least a handful of spike weeks and be great in best ball.

Should definitely include PIT or Pittsburgh as well

Or just mash em all up

Pickensttburgh!

I prefer the pick here by a pretty wide margin, but I'm not a big Burks guy. I could see Burks if you're a truther or he's just "your guy", but I think BPA at 1.06 is more likely to be productive sooner.

JoeJoe88 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 14, 2023 6:12 am That offer shouldn’t get you near the 1.01, so nice work!

x2

Just piling on; this would be egregious.

Pickens even in a bestball. Think there is a big cliff somewhere in the 1.06-1.08 range. Though it does depend on your QB situation a bit I guess. If Pickens is your 4th QB, I guess give me the roll with a wr/RB/TE at 1.08 If George Pickens is one of your QBs at all, you're probably in trouble ;)

As a Swift/Hollywood owner and somebody who traded Kamara for Swift middle of last season, I think the 1.06 is the best piece in the deal.