Dynasty League Football Forum

I agree with OP. Picks disappeared for a long while and would sporadically come back. I raised it on another thread a month or so ago. Seems like they're back now.

Trade calculators are a good data point and often can influence a trade, but I don't know anybody who relies 100% on them.

Set at QB1 with Josh Allen, but Zach Wilson may be starting in week 2 as my QB2 SF, if Darnold craters as many expect.

12 team, SF, PPR I gave: 1.02, 2.02, Pittman WR I got: 1.07, 2.07, Antonio Gibson RB, Reagor WR He took Pitts (1.02) and I took Zach (1.07). Chase at 1.2 in a SF is interesting. If you start 2 or more RBs, getting Gibson and Wilson to fall back is awesome. Thanks - yep start 2 RB's, 3 WR's, 1 TE in...

Come on Zeke's done. 1 more year & cliff is here. You can get a good bit more than Etienne for him now though.

Baker just went for rookie 1.11 (they picked DeVonta Smith WR) straight up in my SF rookie draft this week. Was shocked, but the more I thought about it, the less off it seemed.

Pretty clear decision. If you're a contender, you gotta go Adams. If you're looking to the future, you gotta go JJ due to the age factor. Risks both ways - Obviously if Rodgers doesn't return, that sinks Adams value a good bit, but Adams has shown he can produce at WR1 levels with inferior QB play. ...

Gibson easily

can you pick rookie picks? I'd rather have the 1.01 than Stafford.

Antonio Gibson passes Ezekiel Elliot in consensus dynasty value for good by mid-season. Zach Wilson will be a ROY finalist at year's end. I feel like Gibson already has passed Zeke. He has for me anyway Yes, Gibson is already significantly higher than Zeke in ADP anywhere I've seen. This guy really...

12 team, SF, PPR

I gave: 1.02, 2.02, Pittman WR
I got: 1.07, 2.07, Antonio Gibson RB, Reagor WR

He took Pitts (1.02) and I took Zach (1.07).

Antonio Gibson passes Ezekiel Elliot in consensus dynasty value for good by mid-season.

Zach Wilson will be a ROY finalist at year's end.

thanks for posting this - was a good frame of reference for my rookie SF draft now.

I countered #19 and #23 for #2, #22 and it is almost even trade analyzer. he is pondering. :think: surely stale by now, but couldn't resist. wait, the 2.07 (#19) + 2.11 (#23) for the 1.02? no way dude. 1.02 >>>>>>> that bag o'nickels. Even if #19 really means 1.09, still no way.

dream scenario - Julio to green bay, Rodgers returns and both Adams & Julio go for 1,500 receiving yards & 10+ TD's.

Digging this tool a lot! thanks.

hey on separate note - did draft picks intentionally disappear from assets in the trade analyzer? they were there last week. thx.