Dynasty League Football Forum

I am high on Quick and would keep him.

I would proabably take Martin, Blackmon, and Wilson for sure. Are you required to start a TE? If so I might consider Fleener as I think they could use an upgrade.

yeah Martin going 2 screwed you there. Is 1.5 interested in moving up? Maybe you can make a break even type of deal after you moved up. If you cant move back then take Luck I like this. Sell the pick as either Luck or Blackmon since they are the most desirable players on the board to most. I've see...

ekassor wrote:Decent mid to late 2nd for a contender

Agreed. A contender would be the only team willing to give up anything for him at this point and a 2nd seems about right.

If choosing one you go Blackmon. I value situation very little with WRs as they have long careers and things can change quickly.

Deuces wrote:Im avoiding him in all my leagues, not just because of his situation, more of a hunch and i just cant buy into him.

This. There is something about him that screams avoid to me.

But for some reason I am a Hillman believer. Not sure what to make of my theories....

Here's how the rookie draft in one of my leagues went down. I traded the 1.01 and Little for Wallace/Forte and 1.08. I was "stunned" that when it got to me i actually had to choose between Luck and RG3. 1.01 1. Richardson, Trent CLE RB (R) Mon Apr 30 7:05:54 a.m. CT 2012 1.02 2. Martin, D...

Who cares how long development takes if you are in a dynasty?

And those two QBs going eight or later is crazy regardless of format. There is no way you should be drafting the third best RB or WR over them.

We had to remove two owners after this past season because of spotty participation. I think it is a case by case decision but for us we require more then just setting a lineup.

In my league, youd have no shot if you offered "a couple of firsts and a nice prospect" for Rodgers. Our league values established stud QBs the way you do, so if you want one, you have to overpay on your overpay. Thus, taking the rookies becomes a lot more reasonable. ^This I would not ev...

kris_kapsner wrote: With QBs just not holding as much value as young stud QBs

I think that really depends on your league setup and scoring. My league is very QB friendly and I expect both Luck and Griffin to go in the Top 5.

It's a pretty big deal, but from most accounts, luck feels and reacts to pressure much better than rg3 anyway Not according to Cossell, and he seems to know his stuff. So does Tom Moore and and his comments seem to favor Luck. You can find people on both sides but I personally would favor the opini...

Winner - RGIII Better landing spot than the Colts and I think he will have a better shot at success. I haven't seen success out of the Redskins organization since Rypien was the QB and Synder is proven to be a bad owner thus far. I will hold off on calling this landing spot better for long term suc...

I would think you really have to like the NYG as a landing spot. They like running the ball and Manning > Freeman

Here are Manning's first two seasons as an NFL starting QBs...another thing to keep in mind is that the reason a team has a top pick is because it sucks (unless its WAS here which traded up)....I think we are fooling ourselves if we are thinking Luck will start hot. Newton's success shows RG3 can. ...