Dynasty League Football Forum

I'd need that 2018 first and 2 2nds to consider this, especially since he approached you and clearly wants to be loading up on TB's offense (Winston & OJ)

Think this really hurts your chances this year. I love DJ and actually have him OBJ and Evans as the conversation for overall #1 asset, but in your situation I'd stay the course. Think it hurts your WRs more than it helps your RBs and you are clearly in contention

pierson242 wrote: ↑Wed May 17, 2017 5:58 am 1.02 Davis or Fournette
1.04 Mixon
1.06 Cooks/Williams
1.07 Howard

Agree with this fully, I'd go with these 7 in order, and not stray no matter how the picks go: Davis, LF, Mixon, Cmac, Cook, Williams, Howard

Based on your team, these draft picks and that trade, I think you need to find a harder league

I'd be happy to get JuJu any spot in the 2nd, same with Engram. Great moves from you all the way around.

Very interested in joining! My league is not active enough and I have to start every trade talk. Would be nice to get some trade offers for once :wall: Read the bylaws and the front porch. Tried registering but the couldn't get the CAPTCHA to work. Message me and I can give you my email if needed. O...

Did you edit that or am I going crazy? I would still probably do it, I like to consolidate assets when at all possible.

1.8 to 1.4 in this draft for only a late second is a great price and I would definitely do that. Personally I see LF/Cook as a tier then the remaining 4 as the other. Based on the draft, that could change and the 1.7 may look a lot better depending on who ends up in a good situation. Or someone may ...

I'm a big believer in Dez's talent, just look at when he was healthy last year. DT doesn't have nearly the same upside but like other said is less risky. I'm not sure how much the salary cap room helps you so I'll leave that up to you but it seems like tate doesn't have a good contract

Very even! I agree Crowell is the best asset here, think Cleveland have committed to him and duke and won't draft anyone. Also I think Rawls is the worst asset. However, your team is already stacked at RB and so I'd keep ertz only because it's a TE premium and you're contending big time.

I like this one: Give: Melvin Gordon, Hunter Henry, 1.7, 2.1 Get: Gurley, Reed, Rob Kelly, 1.5 Gordon to Gurley is close to a push. Reed is a big upgrade to Henry and is the win there. It doesn't hurt you are also moving up 2 spots. I agree with Skip, this is probably the only one that I would do A...

:twisted: I am not sure why everyone is just leaping to the assumption that Gillislee is going to get the Blount role in that offense... See my post above about goal line capabilities. BB never pays RB's so the fact that he gave Gillislee and Burkhead both substantial money plus the fact that there...

I am not sure why everyone is just leaping to the assumption that Gillislee is going to get the Blount role in that offense... See my post above about goal line capabilities. BB never pays RB's so the fact that he gave Gillislee and Burkhead both substantial money plus the fact that there are 4 RBs...

Disclosure: I own Ingram. Just thought I'd add one key point here: Ingram didn't have a big workload at all early in his NFL career, he really didn't get a lot of touches until the last 2.5 years. As such, I think saying he is 27 years old and is about to get worse should not be an argument - especi...

Am I missing something here - this seems way too easy? Gillislee steps into the role LG filled last year in which he led the league in TDs due to all the goalline opportunities, which is where Gillislee shined last year - 8 TDs and almost 600 on less than 110 carries (over 5 ypc also). He also went...

This is closer than many on here would like to admit. The significant health concerns for Reed make it a wash. If you're just talking about pure ability, then it's Reed by a fair margin. But ability doesn't mean much if you can't stay on the field. It's a fine 1 for 1 trade. High boom/bust potentia...