Dynasty League Football Forum

I feel Lockett is a solid flex right now. I’m not convinced his inconsistency goes away next season, he’s def not the WR1 in Seattle anymore. And while 28 is not the oldest, he doesn’t scream “rebuild” to me. The trade itself is good value, but i hope he gets more TDs this year. Just prepare for som...

Would u go Pitts at 1.4? I might consider it depending on RBs still there and landing spots. The question is, what do I do at 6 if I go pitts at 4? RB2, WR1/2 or QB3. Take RB2: If Harris is still there slam dunk, otherwise it appears there is a tier drop after RB2-RB3 Take QB3: get QB you want befo...

Would u go Pitts at 1.4?

U’r essentially giving someone Fields, who must really want him, and reasonably so in a SF. I’d do it for no less than two more first this year

This thinking seems reasonable:

Perry_Grin13 wrote: ↑

Sat Jan 23, 2021 9:19 pm

I was thinking of offering 1.02 for 1.04 + 1.06 + swapping second 2.12 for 2.06. Is this too much/not enough?

In my 12t SF; I like Bateman if he falls to me at 2.2, maybe Trask if he’s in a good situation and still there My second pick is 2.10, maybe Frieirmuth, or any number of WR who should be there, Amon-Ra, Toney or Terry, either Moore, Nico, Dynami... The bummer is I don’t think there will be a RB avai...

Team in your sig? I’d prob be thinking Etienne or Harris if either still there at 5... Yeah no doubt both will be there. I just edited my team, it was outdated! Copy. Seems like a pretty stacked team. I’d go into it with a real open mind. Ya know, something something landing spots, something someth...

Team in your sig? I’d prob be thinking Etienne or Harris if either still there at 5...

I think 7 is safe for Pitts. And the trade off is one of Etienne Harris Chase or Smith or a legit QB prospect Smith would be the only let down consolation for me and he’s avoidable at 1.7 i think I've heard several people talking about taking him as the first non QB in SF/TE premium leagues. #7 is ...

In SF I could easily have Smith at 1.7

I think 7 is safe for Pitts. And the trade off is one of Etienne Harris Chase or Smith or a legit QB prospect Smith would be the only let down consolation for me and he’s avoidable at 1.7 i think

Can u scrub Olave from this?

^ We are for sure not doing that

FYI I'm not in a TE premium league or anything but I'm seriously tossing up trying to get Pitts in the mid first round. 2 reasons, everyone in my league has realised how much of an advantage a top TE can be when there is only 2-4 of them, I've got Kelce so he would be his successor on my team in a ...

i traded two 3rds (21 and 22) for him mid-season, so I was hoping same. Fortunately I pulled off a major win for Dak this week, so I'm less needy and worried. Still, I lose that Rivers trade now, 8 weeks for two 3rds

I'm in SF so i already have them 2.2 and 2.3 (QB5 and 6) respectively. It's a solid path to starter, even if a takes a Herbert or Tua type scenario. And the Indy tools and O-line should help keep them upright and able